Climax species: Difference between revisions
I added two citations. One verified that disturbances allow pioneer species to re-establish, and the other verified that climax species are good competitors, but poor colonizers, while pioneer species are the good colonizers, but more competitors. |
|||
(25 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Plant species that can germinate and grow with limited resources}} |
|||
{{ |
{{Refimprove|date=April 2016}} |
||
Climax species, also called '''late [[Sere (ecology)|seral]]''', '''late-successional''', '''[[K-selected]]''' or '''equilibrium''' species, are [[plant]] [[species]] that can germinate and grow with limited resources, like low-sun exposure or low water availability.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Shimano|first=Koji|date=2000-02-01|title=A power function for forest structure and regeneration pattern of pioneer and climax species in patch mosaic forests|url=https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009867302660|journal=Plant Ecology|language=en|volume=146|issue=2|pages=205–218|doi=10.1023/A:1009867302660|issn=1573-5052}}</ref> They are the species within [[Ecological succession|forest succession]] that are more adapted to stable and predictable environments, and will remain essentially unchanged in terms of species composition for as long as a site remains undisturbed.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wehenkel|first=Christian|last2=Bergmann|first2=Fritz|last3=Gregorius|first3=Hans-Rolf|date=2006-07-01|title=Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2|journal=Plant Ecology|language=en|volume=185|issue=1|pages=151–161|doi=10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2|issn=1573-5052}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:AP Biology - Primary Succession Drawing.svg|thumb|356x356px|An image of ecological succession, starting with pioneer species and ending with an old-growth forest that is dominated by climax species, which is denoted by VIII.]] |
|||
Climax species, also called '''late [[Sere (ecology)|seral]]''', '''late-successional''', '''[[K-selected]]''' or '''equilibrium''' species, are [[plant]] [[species]] that can germinate and grow with limited resources; e.g., they need heat exposure or low water availability.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal| vauthors = Shimano K |date=2000-02-01|title=A power function for forest structure and regeneration pattern of pioneer and climax species in patch mosaic forests |journal=Plant Ecology |language=en |volume=146 |issue=2 |pages=205–218 |doi=10.1023/A:1009867302660 |s2cid=275790 |issn=1573-5052}}</ref> They are the species within [[Ecological succession|forest succession]] that are more adapted to stable and predictable environments, and will remain essentially unchanged in terms of [[species composition]] for as long as a site remains undisturbed.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Wehenkel C, Bergmann F, Gregorius HR |date=2006-07-01 |title=Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? |journal=Plant Ecology |language=en |volume=185 |issue=1 |pages=151–161 |doi=10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2 |s2cid=20085178}}</ref> |
|||
The [[seedling]]s of climax species can grow in the shade of the parent trees, ensuring their dominance indefinitely. The presence of climax species can also reduce the prevalence of other species within an ecosystem.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Do HT, Grant JC, Zimmer HC, Trinh BN, Nichols JD | title = Site conditions for regeneration of climax species, the key for restoring moist deciduous tropical forest in Southern Vietnam | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 15 | issue = 5 | pages = e0233524 | date = 2020-05-29 | pmid = 32469962 | pmc = 7259571 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0233524 | bibcode = 2020PLoSO..1533524D | doi-access = free }}</ref> However, a [[Disturbance (ecology)|disturbance]], such as fire, may kill the climax species, allowing [[Pioneer species|pioneer]] or earlier successional species to re-establish for a time.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors = Wehenkel C, Bergmann F, Gregorius HR |date=2006-07-01|title=Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? |journal=Plant Ecology |language=en |volume=185 |issue=1 |pages=151–161 |doi=10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2 |s2cid=20085178 |issn=1573-5052}}</ref> They are the opposite of [[pioneer species]], also known as [[Ruderal species|ruderal]], fugitive, opportunistic or [[R-selected]] species, in the sense that climax species are good competitors but poor colonizers, whereas pioneer species are good colonizers but poor competitors.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Brown S, Dockery J, Pernarowski M | title = Traveling wave solutions of a reaction diffusion model for competing pioneer and climax species | journal = Mathematical Biosciences | volume = 194 | issue = 1 | pages = 21–36 | date = March 2005 | pmid = 15836862 | doi = 10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.001 }}</ref> |
|||
Climax species dominate the [[climax community]], when the pace of succession slows down, the result of [[ecological homeostasis]], which features maximum permitted [[biodiversity]], given the prevailing [[ecology|ecological]] conditions. Their reproductive strategies and other adaptive characteristics can be considered more sophisticated than those of opportunistic species. |
|||
Given the prevailing ecological conditions, climax species dominate the [[climax community]]. When the pace of succession slows down as the result of [[ecological homeostasis]], the maximum permitted [[biodiversity]] is reached.<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Ernest SK | chapter = Homeostasis|date= January 2008 | title = Encyclopedia of Ecology|pages=1879–1884| veditors = Jørgensen SE, Fath BD |place=Oxford|publisher=Academic Press|language=en|doi=10.1016/b978-008045405-4.00507-3|isbn=978-0-08-045405-4 }}</ref> Their reproductive strategies and other adaptive characteristics can be considered more sophisticated than those of opportunistic species.<ref name=":02">{{cite journal| vauthors = Shimano K |date=2000-02-01|title=A power function for forest structure and regeneration pattern of pioneer and climax species in patch mosaic forests |journal=Plant Ecology|language=en|volume=146|issue=2|pages=205–218|doi=10.1023/A:1009867302660|s2cid=275790|issn=1573-5052}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | Through [[negative feedback]], they adapt themselves to specific environmental conditions. Climax species are mostly found in forests. Climax species, closely controlled by [[carrying capacity]], follow [[K strategy|K strategies]], wherein species produce fewer numbers of potential offspring, but invest more heavily in securing the reproductive success of each one to the micro-environmental conditions of its specific [[ecological niche]]. Climax species might be [[Semelparity and Iteroparity|iteroparous]], [[Efficient energy use|energy consumption efficient]] and [[Biogeochemical cycle|nutrient cycling]].<ref> |
||
⚫ | Through [[negative feedback]], they adapt themselves to specific environmental conditions. Climax species are mostly found in forests. Climax species, closely controlled by [[carrying capacity]], follow [[K strategy|K strategies]], wherein species produce fewer numbers of potential offspring, but invest more heavily in securing the reproductive success of each one to the micro-environmental conditions of its specific [[ecological niche]]. Climax species might be [[Semelparity and Iteroparity|iteroparous]], [[Efficient energy use|energy consumption efficient]] and [[Biogeochemical cycle|nutrient cycling]].<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = McShaffrey D | publisher = Marietta College | url = http://www.marietta.edu/~mcshaffd/eco/sym/4SPEC98.html | title = Relationships Among Species | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090616010027/http://www.marietta.edu/~mcshaffd/eco/sym/4SPEC98.html | archive-date = 16 June 2009 }}</ref> |
||
==Disputed term== |
==Disputed term== |
||
The idea of a climax species has been criticized in recent ecological literature.<ref>[http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/people/doaklab/timberland/timberland/results.htm Results, Analysis of Timberland Owned by San Jose Water Company] 2007-04-27</ref> Any assessment of successional states depends on assumptions about the natural fire regime. But the idea of a dominant species is still widely used in [[Silviculture|silvicultural]] programs and [[California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection|California Department of Forestry]] literature. |
The idea of a climax species has been criticized in recent ecological literature.<ref>[http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/people/doaklab/timberland/timberland/results.htm Results, Analysis of Timberland Owned by San Jose Water Company] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130617032242/http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/people/doaklab/timberland/timberland/results.htm |date=2013-06-17 }} 2007-04-27</ref> Any assessment of successional states depends on assumptions about the natural fire regime. But the idea of a dominant species is still widely used in [[Silviculture|silvicultural]] programs and [[California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection|California Department of Forestry]] literature.{{cn|date=July 2023}} |
||
==Examples== |
==Examples== |
||
[[Picea glauca|White spruce]] (''Picea glauca'') is an example of a climax species in the northern forests of North America. |
[[Picea glauca|White spruce]] (''Picea glauca'') is an example of a climax species in the northern forests of North America due to its ability to adapt to resource scarce, stable conditions, it dominates Northern forest ecosystem in the absence of a disturbance.<ref>{{cite web|title=Picea glauca|url=https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/picgla/all.html|access-date=2020-12-03|website=www.fs.fed.us}}</ref> |
||
Other examples: |
Other examples of climax species in old-growth forests: |
||
*[[Tsuga canadensis|Canadian hemlock]] |
* [[Tsuga canadensis|Canadian hemlock]] |
||
*[[Abies amabilis|Pacific silver fir]] |
* [[Abies amabilis|Pacific silver fir]] |
||
*[[Abies concolor|White fir]] |
* [[Abies concolor|White fir]] |
||
*[[Sloanea woollsii|Yellow carabeen]] |
* [[Sloanea woollsii|Yellow carabeen]] |
||
*[[Blue grama]] |
* [[Blue grama]] |
||
*[[Douglas fir]] |
* [[Douglas fir]] |
||
*[[Sequoia sempervirens|Coast redwood]] |
* [[Sequoia sempervirens|Coast redwood]] |
||
*[[European beech]] |
* [[European beech]] |
||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
*[[Climax vegetation]] |
* [[Climax vegetation]] |
||
== |
== References == |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
== Further reading == |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
*Selleck, G. W. "The climax concept". The Botanical Review. Volume 26, Number 4 / October, 1960. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02940574 Springer]. |
|||
* {{cite journal |vauthors=Selleck GW |title=The climax concept. |journal=The Botanical Review |date=October 1960 |volume=26 |issue=4 |pages=534–45 |doi=10.1007/BF02940574 |s2cid=25696601 |via=Biodiversity Heritage Library}} |
|||
*Drury, William H.; Nisbet, Ian C.T. 1973. "Succession". Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 54: 331-368. |
|||
* {{cite journal |vauthors=Drury WH, Nisbet IC |date=1973 |title=Succession |journal=Journal of the Arnold Arboretum |volume=54 |issue=3 |pages=331–368 |doi=10.5962/p.325716 |s2cid=240339706 |url=}} |
|||
* |
* {{cite journal |vauthors=Horn HS |title=The Ecology of Secondary Succession. |journal=Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics |date=November 1974 |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=25–37 |doi=10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325}}\ |
||
* |
* {{cite journal |vauthors=Swaine MD, Whitmore TC |title=On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. |journal=Plant Ecology |volume=75 |issue=1–2 |date=May 1988 |pages=81–86 |doi=10.1007/BF00044629 |publisher=Springer |s2cid=37620288}} |
||
*Buchanan, J. Robert. "Turing instability in pioneer/climax species interactions". October 2004. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.010 Science Direct]. |
|||
* {{cite journal |vauthors=Buchanan JR |title=Turing instability in pioneer/climax species interactions |journal=Mathematical Biosciences |volume=194 |issue=2 |pages=199–216 |date=April 2005 |pmid=15854676 |doi=10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.010}} |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Climax Species}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Climax Species}} |
||
[[Category:Ecological succession]] |
[[Category:Ecological succession]] |
||
[[Category:Botany]] |
[[Category:Botany]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Botanical terminology]] |
||
[[Category:Habitat]] |
[[Category:Habitat]] |
||
[[Category:Environmental terminology]] |
[[Category:Environmental terminology]] |
Latest revision as of 02:06, 8 May 2024
This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2016) |
Climax species, also called late seral, late-successional, K-selected or equilibrium species, are plant species that can germinate and grow with limited resources; e.g., they need heat exposure or low water availability.[1] They are the species within forest succession that are more adapted to stable and predictable environments, and will remain essentially unchanged in terms of species composition for as long as a site remains undisturbed.[2]
The seedlings of climax species can grow in the shade of the parent trees, ensuring their dominance indefinitely. The presence of climax species can also reduce the prevalence of other species within an ecosystem.[3] However, a disturbance, such as fire, may kill the climax species, allowing pioneer or earlier successional species to re-establish for a time.[4] They are the opposite of pioneer species, also known as ruderal, fugitive, opportunistic or R-selected species, in the sense that climax species are good competitors but poor colonizers, whereas pioneer species are good colonizers but poor competitors.[5]
Given the prevailing ecological conditions, climax species dominate the climax community. When the pace of succession slows down as the result of ecological homeostasis, the maximum permitted biodiversity is reached.[6] Their reproductive strategies and other adaptive characteristics can be considered more sophisticated than those of opportunistic species.[7]
Through negative feedback, they adapt themselves to specific environmental conditions. Climax species are mostly found in forests. Climax species, closely controlled by carrying capacity, follow K strategies, wherein species produce fewer numbers of potential offspring, but invest more heavily in securing the reproductive success of each one to the micro-environmental conditions of its specific ecological niche. Climax species might be iteroparous, energy consumption efficient and nutrient cycling.[8]
Disputed term
[edit]The idea of a climax species has been criticized in recent ecological literature.[9] Any assessment of successional states depends on assumptions about the natural fire regime. But the idea of a dominant species is still widely used in silvicultural programs and California Department of Forestry literature.[citation needed]
Examples
[edit]White spruce (Picea glauca) is an example of a climax species in the northern forests of North America due to its ability to adapt to resource scarce, stable conditions, it dominates Northern forest ecosystem in the absence of a disturbance.[10]
Other examples of climax species in old-growth forests:
- Canadian hemlock
- Pacific silver fir
- White fir
- Yellow carabeen
- Blue grama
- Douglas fir
- Coast redwood
- European beech
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Shimano K (2000-02-01). "A power function for forest structure and regeneration pattern of pioneer and climax species in patch mosaic forests". Plant Ecology. 146 (2): 205–218. doi:10.1023/A:1009867302660. ISSN 1573-5052. S2CID 275790.
- ^ Wehenkel C, Bergmann F, Gregorius HR (2006-07-01). "Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?". Plant Ecology. 185 (1): 151–161. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2. S2CID 20085178.
- ^ Do HT, Grant JC, Zimmer HC, Trinh BN, Nichols JD (2020-05-29). "Site conditions for regeneration of climax species, the key for restoring moist deciduous tropical forest in Southern Vietnam". PLOS ONE. 15 (5): e0233524. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1533524D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233524. PMC 7259571. PMID 32469962.
- ^ Wehenkel C, Bergmann F, Gregorius HR (2006-07-01). "Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?". Plant Ecology. 185 (1): 151–161. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2. ISSN 1573-5052. S2CID 20085178.
- ^ Brown S, Dockery J, Pernarowski M (March 2005). "Traveling wave solutions of a reaction diffusion model for competing pioneer and climax species". Mathematical Biosciences. 194 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.001. PMID 15836862.
- ^ Ernest SK (January 2008). "Homeostasis". In Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (eds.). Encyclopedia of Ecology. Oxford: Academic Press. pp. 1879–1884. doi:10.1016/b978-008045405-4.00507-3. ISBN 978-0-08-045405-4.
- ^ Shimano K (2000-02-01). "A power function for forest structure and regeneration pattern of pioneer and climax species in patch mosaic forests". Plant Ecology. 146 (2): 205–218. doi:10.1023/A:1009867302660. ISSN 1573-5052. S2CID 275790.
- ^ McShaffrey D. "Relationships Among Species". Marietta College. Archived from the original on 16 June 2009.
- ^ Results, Analysis of Timberland Owned by San Jose Water Company Archived 2013-06-17 at the Wayback Machine 2007-04-27
- ^ "Picea glauca". www.fs.fed.us. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
Further reading
[edit]- Selleck GW (October 1960). "The climax concept". The Botanical Review. 26 (4): 534–45. doi:10.1007/BF02940574. S2CID 25696601 – via Biodiversity Heritage Library.
- Drury WH, Nisbet IC (1973). "Succession". Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 54 (3): 331–368. doi:10.5962/p.325716. S2CID 240339706.
- Horn HS (November 1974). "The Ecology of Secondary Succession". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 5 (1): 25–37. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325.\
- Swaine MD, Whitmore TC (May 1988). "On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests". Plant Ecology. 75 (1–2). Springer: 81–86. doi:10.1007/BF00044629. S2CID 37620288.
- Buchanan JR (April 2005). "Turing instability in pioneer/climax species interactions". Mathematical Biosciences. 194 (2): 199–216. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.010. PMID 15854676.