Jump to content

Talk:Kimberlee Weatherall: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kingbotk (talk | contribs)
Bot (FAQ) (Plugin) Tag Category:Living people. Added {{WPBiography}}, living=yes, listas=Weatherall, Kimberlee.
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Women writers}}, {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}.
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=Stub|listas=Weatherall, Kimberlee|1=
{{WPBiography
{{WikiProject Biography |s&a-work-group=yes}}
|living=yes
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Mid}}
|class=
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Low}}
|priority=
{{WikiProject Australia}}
|listas=Weatherall, Kimberlee
}}
}}

==Improvement requested==
{{ping|CaroleHenson}}, {{ping|Megalibrarygirl}} - can you improve this article before it gets sent to AfD? [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
::{{yo|Ritchie333}}, On it! ;) [[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] ([[User talk:Megalibrarygirl|talk]]) 16:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

==Unsourced material==
I'm moving the unsourced material here. [[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] ([[User talk:Megalibrarygirl|talk]]) 16:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Her blog ''Weatherall's Law'' is one of the few covering IP issues in Australia in a manner accessible to non-lawyers.{{citation needed|date=February 2012}} It contains detailed analyses of legal issues in Australia, including cases, legislation and legislative review. Started in mid-2002, the blog was particularly active in discussing the [[Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement]] IP Chapter.

Weatherall was cited in the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs report on the required Exceptions for Technological Protection Measures. Her article on ''Sony vs. Stevens'' (which tested the anti-circumvention law in Australia) was quoted twice in the final decision.{{Peacock term|date=December 2009}}

Latest revision as of 00:52, 29 February 2024

Improvement requested

[edit]

@CaroleHenson:, @Megalibrarygirl: - can you improve this article before it gets sent to AfD? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333:, On it! ;) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material

[edit]

I'm moving the unsourced material here. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Her blog Weatherall's Law is one of the few covering IP issues in Australia in a manner accessible to non-lawyers.[citation needed] It contains detailed analyses of legal issues in Australia, including cases, legislation and legislative review. Started in mid-2002, the blog was particularly active in discussing the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement IP Chapter.

Weatherall was cited in the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs report on the required Exceptions for Technological Protection Measures. Her article on Sony vs. Stevens (which tested the anti-circumvention law in Australia) was quoted twice in the final decision.[peacock prose]