Jump to content

Talk:HMS Sheffield (D80): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2022-05-04. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Ships}}, {{WikiProject South America}}, {{WikiProject British Overseas Territories}}, {{WikiProject Shipwrecks}}. Remove 5 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{On this day|date1=2013-05-04|oldid1=553323876|date2=2022-05-04|oldid2=1086139097}}
{{On this day|date1=2013-05-04|oldid1=553323876|date2=2022-05-04|oldid2=1086139097}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Military history|class=start |B1=n|B2=n|B3=n|B4=yes|B5=yes|Maritime=yes|British=yes}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=start |B1=n|B2=n|B3=n|B4=yes|B5=yes|Maritime=yes|British=yes}}
{{WikiProject Ships |class=start |b1=n |b2=n |b3=n |b4=y |b5=y}}
{{WikiProject Ships }}
{{WikiProject South America|class=start |importance=|Falkland Islands=yes|Falkland Islands-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject South America|importance=|Falkland Islands=yes|Falkland Islands-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject British Overseas Territories|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject British Overseas Territories|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Shipwrecks|importance=mid|class=start}}
{{WikiProject Shipwrecks|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 19: Line 19:
{{British English}}
{{British English}}
{{archives|search=yes}}
{{archives|search=yes}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on [[HMS Sheffield (D80)]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=807347415 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070425070019/http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar/conflicto/dias/may04b.html to http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar/conflicto/dias/may04b.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212000955/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/D5E979F4-CD1D-4626-86B5-F432355861EA/0/phase2_part2_narrative_of_attach.pdf to http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/D5E979F4-CD1D-4626-86B5-F432355861EA/0/phase2_part2_narrative_of_attach.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 11:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


==New sections==
==New sections==

Latest revision as of 05:28, 15 February 2024

New sections

[edit]

An attempt to get a bit more structure into the article to make it an easier read. Still needs work though... - Snori (talk) 04:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cite for synthetic clothing in uniforms

[edit]

[1] I was planning to add but having problems with the tool to convert to a reference. Save for later or for any kind soul to do in the mean time. WCMemail 10:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But it doesn't mention Sheffield explicitly. Maybe better to put this with this reference into the main Falkland War article? --Ozzy (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False-friendly fire?

[edit]

I vaguely remember reading that one of the problems experienced by the Sheffield was that its missile-defense systems had been programmed to ignore friendly missiles, and the Exocet, being French, was seen as "friendly" (thanks to the expected response to a Soviet attack) and not dangerous. Am I wrong in that? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is nonsense, the ESM system on Sheffield, had it not been transmitting on SATCOM would have classified the Exocet as a threat. WCMemail 14:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]