Jump to content

Talk:Minuscule 2427: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Bible}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Bible|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=low}}
}}


==[Untitled]==
I wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15.
I wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15.
Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --[[User:Harnack|Harnack]] ([[User talk:Harnack|talk]]) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --[[User:Harnack|Harnack]] ([[User talk:Harnack|talk]]) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:12, 2 February 2024

[Untitled]

[edit]

I wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15. Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --Harnack (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be said that the text possibly did not start out as a forgery but became one - ie 'someone' commissioned 'a perfect replica done in the original style', which then became an autonomous object: this has been known to happen (as is the tradition of copying existing manuscripts in a religions context. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC) (developing an entry of 09:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]