Talk:Minuscule 2427: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Jackiespeel (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tag: |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
||
{{WikiProject Bible|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==[Untitled]== |
|||
I wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15. |
I wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15. |
||
Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --[[User:Harnack|Harnack]] ([[User talk:Harnack|talk]]) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --[[User:Harnack|Harnack]] ([[User talk:Harnack|talk]]) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:12, 2 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minuscule 2427 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]I wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15. Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --Harnack (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Can it be said that the text possibly did not start out as a forgery but became one - ie 'someone' commissioned 'a perfect replica done in the original style', which then became an autonomous object: this has been known to happen (as is the tradition of copying existing manuscripts in a religions context. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC) (developing an entry of 09:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC))