Jump to content

Christopher Floyd: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Judgements: Judgments
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫
{{other people}}
{{EngvarB|date=September 2014}}
{{EngvarB|date=September 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2014}}
⚫
'''Sir Christopher David Floyd''', [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|PC]] (born 20 December 1951), is a retired [[English law|English]] [[barrister]] and judge. He served as a Lord Justice of Appeal from 2013 until 2021.
⚫
{{other people}}
⚫
'''Sir Christopher David Floyd''' (born 20 December 1951), styled '''The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Floyd''', is an [[English law|English]] [[barrister]] and judge. He has served as a Lord Justice of Appeal since 2013.


==Career==
==Career==
The son of David and Hana Floyd, Floyd was educated at [[Westminster School]] and [[Trinity College, Cambridge]], where he took his degree in [[Natural Sciences]] and Law. He was [[called to the bar]] at [[Inner Temple]] in 1975 and became a [[Bencher]] of his inn in 2001. In 1988, he was called to the bar of the [[Republic of Ireland]] and in 1992 was appointed a [[Queen's Counsel]]. He was appointed an Assistant Recorder in 1994 and a [[Recorder (judge)|Recorder]] in 2000, being authorised as a deputy High Court judge and assigned to the [[Patents Court]] in 1998. He served as Deputy Chairman of the Copyright Tribunal from 1995 to 2007.<ref name=who>'FLOYD, Hon. Sir Christopher (David), Kt 2007' in ''[[Who's Who (UK)|Who's Who 2011]]'' (London, A. & C. Black, 2010)</ref> On 5 November 2007, he was appointed a [[High Court judge]], receiving the customary [[Knight Bachelor|knighthood]], and assigned to the [[Chancery Division]].<ref>{{London Gazette |issue=58513 |startpage=16593 |date=15 November 2007}}</ref> On 9 April 2013, he was appointed a [[Lord Justice of Appeal]]<ref>{{London Gazette |issue=60472 |startpage=7097 |date=11 April 2013}}</ref> and consequently appointed to the [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|Privy Council]].
The son of David and Hana Floyd, Floyd was educated at [[Westminster School]] and [[Trinity College, Cambridge]], where he took his degree in [[Natural Sciences]] and Law. He was [[called to the bar]] at [[Inner Temple]] in 1975 and became a [[Bencher]] of his inn in 2001. In 1988, he was called to the bar of the [[Republic of Ireland]] and in 1992 was appointed a [[Queen's Counsel]]. He was appointed an Assistant Recorder in 1994 and a [[Recorder (judge)|Recorder]] in 2000, being authorised as a deputy High Court judge and assigned to the [[Patents Court]] in 1998. He served as Deputy Chairman of the Copyright Tribunal from 1995 to 2007.<ref name=who>'FLOYD, Hon. Sir Christopher (David), Kt 2007' in ''[[Who's Who (UK)|Who's Who 2011]]'' (London, A. & C. Black, 2010)</ref> On 5 November 2007, he was appointed a [[High Court judge (England and Wales)|High Court judge]], receiving the customary [[Knight Bachelor|knighthood]], and assigned to the [[Chancery Division]].<ref>{{London Gazette |issue=58513 |page=16593 |date=15 November 2007}}</ref> On 9 April 2013, he was appointed a [[Lord Justice of Appeal]]<ref>{{London Gazette |issue=60472 |page=7097 |date=11 April 2013}}</ref> and consequently appointed to the [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|Privy Council]].


==Other appointments==
==Other appointments==
Line 16: Line 16:


==Notable cases==
==Notable cases==
A case brought by the musician [[Bobby Valentino (British musician)|Bobby Valentino]] in 2002 attracted media attention after Valentino performed the violin in court to illustrate a point, convincing Floyd to rule in his favour and award him damages of £100,000.<ref>[http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article182591.ece Violinist wins fight for royalties after musical interlude in the High Court] at independent.co.uk</ref>
A case brought by the musician [[Bobby Valentino (British musician)|Bobby Valentino]] in 2002 attracted media attention after Valentino performed the violin in court to illustrate a point, convincing Floyd to rule in his favour and award him damages of £100,000.<ref>[http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article182591.ece Violinist wins fight for royalties after musical interlude in the High Court] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930190919/http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article182591.ece |date=30 September 2007 }} at independent.co.uk</ref>


In 2010, [[Liverpool F. C.|Liverpool Football Club]]'s creditors, including the [[Royal Bank of Scotland]], went to court to allow the club's board to proceed with selling it. Floyd ruled in favour of the creditors, thus paving the way for the sale of the club to [[New England Sports Ventures]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=831953&sec=england&cc=4716 |title=Liverpool takeover to go ahead as owners lose case |publisher=ESPN |date=13 October 2010 |accessdate=23 March 2011}}</ref> On 15 October 2010, Liverpool F. C. was sold to NESV for £300&nbsp;million.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9094283.stm |title=Liverpool takeover completed by US company NESV |publisher=BBC Sport |date=15 October 2010 |accessdate=12 August 2011}}</ref>
In 2010, [[Liverpool F. C.|Liverpool Football Club]]'s creditors, including the [[Royal Bank of Scotland]], went to court to allow the club's board to proceed with selling it. Floyd ruled in favour of the creditors, thus paving the way for the sale of the club to [[New England Sports Ventures]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=831953&sec=england&cc=4716 |title=Liverpool takeover to go ahead as owners lose case |publisher=ESPN |date=13 October 2010 |accessdate=23 March 2011 |archive-date=16 October 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101016070447/http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=831953&sec=england&cc=4716 |url-status=dead }}</ref> On 15 October 2010, Liverpool F. C. was sold to NESV for £300&nbsp;million.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9094283.stm |title=Liverpool takeover completed by US company NESV |publisher=BBC Sport |date=15 October 2010 |accessdate=12 August 2011}}</ref>


In June 2011, Floyd heard a case brought by ITV et al. against the [[internet television]] platform [[TVCatchup]].<ref>{{cite news|last=Andrews|first=Robert|title=Broadcasters Get A Mixed Judgment Against TVCatchup|url=http://paidcontent.org/article/419-broadcasters-get-a-mixed-judgement-against-tvcatchup/|accessdate=10 August 2011|newspaper=paidContent:UK|date=9 August 2011}}</ref> He ruled that TVCatchup's defence of relying on section 73 of the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA88) was valid, allowing the service to retransmit "qualifying services", namely all [[BBC]] services, [[ITV1]], [[Channel 4]] and [[Channel 5 (UK)|Channel 5]], over the internet. However, he excluded retransmission of any other channels under these provisions as well as retransmission to 3G mobile devices. He referred to the [[European Court of Justice]] (ECJ) for guidance on some aspects of the case.<ref>{{cite court|litigants=ITV Broadcasting Ltd & Ors v TV Catchup Ltd|opinion=[2011] EWHC 1874 (Pat)|date=18 July 2011|url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2011/1874.html|quote=The section 73 defence applies to the qualifying services, but not in respect of re-transmission to mobile phones or of out of area services.}}</ref> Notwithstanding the ECJ ruling that the re-transmission in question was a communication to the public within the meaning of article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29,<ref>{{cite court|litigants=ITV Studios Ltd v TV Catchup Ltd|opinion=[2013] EUECJ C60711 |date=7 March 2013|url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=eu/cases/EUECJ/2013/C60711.html|quote=Consequently the re-transmission in question was a communication to the public within the meaning of article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29.}}</ref> in his final order, he maintained the right of TVCatchup to rely on CDPA88 for the retransmission as a cable service of the qualifying services.<ref>{{cite web|title=High Court Sealed Order|url=http://static.tvcatchup.com/DOCS/ITV,%20Ch%204,%20Ch%205%20v%20TV%20Catchup%20Sealed%20Order%20%207th%20October%202013%20LJ%20Floyd.pdf|accessdate=16 October 2013|date=7 October 2013}}</ref>
In June 2011, Floyd heard a case brought by ITV et al. against the [[internet television]] platform [[TVCatchup]].<ref>{{cite news|last=Andrews|first=Robert|title=Broadcasters Get A Mixed Judgment Against TVCatchup|url=http://paidcontent.org/article/419-broadcasters-get-a-mixed-judgement-against-tvcatchup/|accessdate=10 August 2011|newspaper=paidContent:UK|date=9 August 2011}}</ref> He ruled that TVCatchup's defence of relying on section 73 of the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA88) was valid, allowing the service to retransmit "qualifying services", namely all [[BBC]] services, [[ITV1]], [[Channel 4]] and [[Channel 5 (UK)|Channel 5]], over the internet. However, he excluded retransmission of any other channels under these provisions as well as retransmission to 3G mobile devices. He referred to the [[European Court of Justice]] (ECJ) for guidance on some aspects of the case.<ref>{{cite court|litigants=ITV Broadcasting Ltd & Ors v TV Catchup Ltd|opinion=[2011] EWHC 1874 (Pat)|date=18 July 2011|url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2011/1874.html|quote=The section 73 defence applies to the qualifying services, but not in respect of re-transmission to mobile phones or of out of area services.}}</ref> Notwithstanding the ECJ ruling that the re-transmission in question was a communication to the public within the meaning of article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29,<ref>{{cite court|litigants=ITV Studios Ltd v TV Catchup Ltd|opinion=[2013] EUECJ C60711 |date=7 March 2013|url=http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=eu/cases/EUECJ/2013/C60711.html|quote=Consequently the re-transmission in question was a communication to the public within the meaning of article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29.}}</ref> in his final order, he maintained the right of TVCatchup to rely on CDPA88 for the retransmission as a cable service of the qualifying services.<ref>{{cite web|title=High Court Sealed Order|url=http://static.tvcatchup.com/DOCS/ITV,%20Ch%204,%20Ch%205%20v%20TV%20Catchup%20Sealed%20Order%20%207th%20October%202013%20LJ%20Floyd.pdf|accessdate=16 October 2013|date=7 October 2013|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017055956/http://static.tvcatchup.com/DOCS/ITV%2C%20Ch%204%2C%20Ch%205%20v%20TV%20Catchup%20Sealed%20Order%20%207th%20October%202013%20LJ%20Floyd.pdf|archivedate=17 October 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref>

In July 2011, in a case involving [[Alexander Montagu, 13th Duke of Manchester]], Floyd found the two children of the Duke's [[bigamy|bigamous marriage]] to be [[Legitimacy (law)|legitimate]] for the purpose of sharing in a family [[trust fund]]. Floyd said in his decision that the laws of Australia, California and England all allowed the children of bigamous marriages to be treated as legitimate and concluded: "Alexander and Ashley acquired the status of legitimacy by reason of the law of the domicile of each of their parents. That is the case whether the 13th Duke was domiciled in England, in Australia or in California."<ref>Daily Mail Reporter, ''[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2016558/Duke-Manchesters-children-CAN-inherit-fortune-despite-bigamous-marriage.html Duke of Manchester's children CAN inherit his huge fortune despite their father's bigamous marriage]'' dated 19 July 2011, at dailymail.co.uk</ref>


===Judgments===
===Judgments===
*''[[Relfo Ltd v Varsani]]'' [2014] EWCA Civ 360 - [[English unjust enrichment]] law concerning to what extent enrichment of the defendant must be at the expense of the claimant; Floyd LJ concurring with [[Arden LJ]]
*''[[Relfo Ltd v Varsani]]'' [2014] EWCA Civ 360 - [[English unjust enrichment]] law concerning to what extent enrichment of the defendant must be at the expense of the claimant; Floyd LJ concurring with [[Arden LJ]]
*''[[St John Webster v Ashcroft]]'' [2013] EWHC 1316


==Private life==
==Private life==
Line 32: Line 31:
==References==
==References==
{{reflist|30em}}
{{reflist|30em}}

{{authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Floyd, Christopher}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Floyd, Christopher}}
Line 39: Line 40:
[[Category:British barristers]]
[[Category:British barristers]]
[[Category:Chancery Division judges]]
[[Category:Chancery Division judges]]
[[Category:English judges]]
[[Category:20th-century English judges]]
[[Category:Knights Bachelor]]
[[Category:Knights Bachelor]]
[[Category:Members of the Inner Temple]]
[[Category:Members of the Inner Temple]]
[[Category:People educated at Westminster School, London]]
[[Category:People educated at Westminster School, London]]
[[Category:Queen's Counsel 1901–2000]]
[[Category:20th-century King's Counsel]]
[[Category:Lords Justices of Appeal]]
[[Category:Lord Justices of Appeal]]
[[Category:Members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:21st-century English judges]]

Latest revision as of 17:43, 7 December 2023

For other people named Christopher Floyd, see Christopher Floyd (disambiguation).

Sir Christopher David Floyd, PC (born 20 December 1951), is a retired English barrister and judge. He served as a Lord Justice of Appeal from 2013 until 2021.

Career

[edit]

The son of David and Hana Floyd, Floyd was educated at Westminster School and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he took his degree in Natural Sciences and Law. He was called to the bar at Inner Temple in 1975 and became a Bencher of his inn in 2001. In 1988, he was called to the bar of the Republic of Ireland and in 1992 was appointed a Queen's Counsel. He was appointed an Assistant Recorder in 1994 and a Recorder in 2000, being authorised as a deputy High Court judge and assigned to the Patents Court in 1998. He served as Deputy Chairman of the Copyright Tribunal from 1995 to 2007.[1] On 5 November 2007, he was appointed a High Court judge, receiving the customary knighthood, and assigned to the Chancery Division.[2] On 9 April 2013, he was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal[3] and consequently appointed to the Privy Council.

Other appointments

[edit]
  • 1996–2007: Member, Bar Council Chairman's Arbitration/Conciliation Panel[1]
  • 1998–2002: Member, Bar Council Professional Conduct and Complaints Committee[1]
  • 2000–2004: Member, Bar Council[1]
  • 2003–2004: Bar Council European Committee[1]
  • 1999–2004: Chairman, Intellectual Property Bar Association[1]
  • 2009– : Chairman, Permanent Exhibition of Legal Costume[1]

Notable cases

[edit]

A case brought by the musician Bobby Valentino in 2002 attracted media attention after Valentino performed the violin in court to illustrate a point, convincing Floyd to rule in his favour and award him damages of £100,000.[4]

In 2010, Liverpool Football Club's creditors, including the Royal Bank of Scotland, went to court to allow the club's board to proceed with selling it. Floyd ruled in favour of the creditors, thus paving the way for the sale of the club to New England Sports Ventures.[5] On 15 October 2010, Liverpool F. C. was sold to NESV for £300 million.[6]

In June 2011, Floyd heard a case brought by ITV et al. against the internet television platform TVCatchup.[7] He ruled that TVCatchup's defence of relying on section 73 of the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA88) was valid, allowing the service to retransmit "qualifying services", namely all BBC services, ITV1, Channel 4 and Channel 5, over the internet. However, he excluded retransmission of any other channels under these provisions as well as retransmission to 3G mobile devices. He referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for guidance on some aspects of the case.[8] Notwithstanding the ECJ ruling that the re-transmission in question was a communication to the public within the meaning of article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29,[9] in his final order, he maintained the right of TVCatchup to rely on CDPA88 for the retransmission as a cable service of the qualifying services.[10]

Judgments

[edit]

Private life

[edit]

In 1974 Floyd married Rosalind Jane Arscott, and they have one son and two daughters. He is a member of the Garrick Club.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h 'FLOYD, Hon. Sir Christopher (David), Kt 2007' in Who's Who 2011 (London, A. & C. Black, 2010)
  2. ^ "No. 58513". The London Gazette. 15 November 2007. p. 16593.
  3. ^ "No. 60472". The London Gazette. 11 April 2013. p. 7097.
  4. ^ Violinist wins fight for royalties after musical interlude in the High Court Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine at independent.co.uk
  5. ^ "Liverpool takeover to go ahead as owners lose case". ESPN. 13 October 2010. Archived from the original on 16 October 2010. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  6. ^ "Liverpool takeover completed by US company NESV". BBC Sport. 15 October 2010. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  7. ^ Andrews, Robert (9 August 2011). "Broadcasters Get A Mixed Judgment Against TVCatchup". paidContent:UK. Retrieved 10 August 2011.
  8. ^ ITV Broadcasting Ltd & Ors v TV Catchup Ltd, [2011 EWHC 1874 (Pat)] (18 July 2011) ("The section 73 defence applies to the qualifying services, but not in respect of re-transmission to mobile phones or of out of area services.").
  9. ^ ITV Studios Ltd v TV Catchup Ltd, [2013 EUECJ C60711] (7 March 2013) ("Consequently the re-transmission in question was a communication to the public within the meaning of article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29.").
  10. ^ "High Court Sealed Order" (PDF). 7 October 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Floyd&oldid=1188783996"