Jump to content

Center for Reproductive Rights: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American non-profit organization}}
{{primary sources|date=June 2010}}
{{Infobox Organization
{{Infobox organization
|name = Center for Reproductive Rights
|name = Center for Reproductive Rights
|logo = crr.logo-large.svg
|image =
|alt = Logo of Center for Reproductive Rights
|leader_title = President and CEO
|leader_title = [[President (corporation)|President]] and [[Chief Executive Officer]]
|leader_name = [[Nancy Northup]]
|leader_name = [[Nancy Northup]]<ref name= leadership>"[https://reproductiverights.org/about-us/leadership-and-staff Center Leadership & Staff]". ''Center for Reproductive Rights''. Retrieved June 29, 2020.</ref>
⚫
|leader_title2 =
|leader_name2 =
|leader_name2 = Amy Metzler Ritter<ref name= leadership/>
⚫
|leader_title2 = [[Chairman|Chair]]
|membership =
|headquarters = [[New York City]]
|headquarters = [[New York City]]
|formation = {{start date and age|1992|05|14}}<ref name= corp>"[https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx Center for Reproductive Rights]". ''Division of Corporations''. Delaware Department of State. Retrieved June 29, 2020.</ref>
|formation = 1992
|type = Non-profit corporation
|type = [[Nonprofit organization]]
|status = [[501(c)(3)]]<ref name= irseos>"[https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/displayAll.do?dispatchMethod=displayAllInfo&Id=937536&ein=133669731&country=US&deductibility=all&dispatchMethod=searchAll&isDescending=false&city=&ein1=&postDateFrom=&exemptTypeCode=al&submitName=&sortColumn=orgName&totalResults=1&names=center+for+reproductive+rights&resultsPerPage=25&indexOfFirstRow=0&postDateTo=&state=All+States Center for Reproductive Rights]". ''Tax Exempt Organization Search''. [[Internal Revenue Service]]. Retrieved June 29, 2020.</ref>
|predecessor =
|tax_id = 13-3669731<ref name= irseos/>
|budget=
|purpose= The advancement of reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right
|purpose= The advancement of reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right.<ref name= 990-2018/>
|region_served = World wide
|region_served = Global
|employees = 179<ref name= 990-2018>"[https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/133669731_201806_990_2019030416143053.pdf Form 990: Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax]". ''The Center for Reproductive Rights''. [[Internal Revenue Service]]. June 30, 2018.</ref>
|num_staff =
|employees_year = 2017
|num_volunteers =
|volunteers = 19<ref name= 990-2018/>
|motto =
|volunteers_year = 2017
⚫
|website = http://reproductiverights.org/
|revenue = $34,071,507<ref name= 990-2018/>
|revenue_year = 2018
|expenses = $28,873,813<ref name= 990-2018/>
|expenses_year = 2018
|formerly = Center for Reproductive Law and Policy<ref name=publiclives/>
⚫
|website = {{url|http://reproductiverights.org}}
}}
}}
The '''Center for Reproductive Rights''' (CRR) is a global reproductive rights organization that uses constitutional and international law to secure women's right to an abortion in over 45 countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://reproductiverights.org/ |title=Center for Reproductive Rights |publisher=Reproductiverights.org |date=2010-06-04 |accessdate=2010-06-11}}</ref> Founded by [[Janet Benshoof]] in 1992, its original name was the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Wadler|first1=Joyce|title=PUBLIC LIVES; Defending the Defenders of Abortion Rights|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1998/11/04/nyregion/public-lives-defending-the-defenders-of-abortion-rights.html|accessdate=2 March 2016|publisher=The New York Times|date=November 4, 1998}}</ref>
The '''Center for Reproductive Rights''' ('''CRR''') is a global legal [[Advocacy group|advocacy organization]], headquartered in [[New York City]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newsweek.com/ohio-texas-heartbeat-abortion-ban-womens-health-2017-530351|title=Ohio and Texas are among the battleground states for abortion rights next year|date=2016-12-10|newspaper=Newsweek|access-date=2016-12-10}}</ref> that seeks to advance [[reproductive rights]], such as [[abortion]]. The organization's stated mission is to "use the law to advance reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right that all governments are legally obligated to protect, respect, and fulfill."<ref>{{cite web|title=About Us|url=http://www.reproductiverights.org/about-us|publisher=Center for Reproductive Rights|access-date=15 September 2016}}</ref> Founded by [[Janet Benshoof]] in 1992, its original name was the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.<ref name= publiclives>{{cite news|last1=Wadler|first1=Joyce|title=Public Lives: Defending the Defenders of Abortion Rights|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1998/11/04/nyregion/public-lives-defending-the-defenders-of-abortion-rights.html|access-date=2 March 2016|work=The New York Times|date=November 4, 1998}}</ref>


⚫
[[CharityWatch]] rates the Center for Reproductive Rights "B+".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/center-for-reproductive-rights/2|title=Charity Watch Top Rated Charities|access-date=19 September 2021}}</ref>
⚫
Headquartered in [[New York City]], the Center has recently expanded its international program, including the launch of an international litigation campaign that has included the first [[abortion]] case decided by the [[United Nations]] Human Rights Committee and the first case to frame preventable maternal deaths as a [[human rights]] violation.
__TOC__
==History==
⚫
In July 2011, the CRR filed suit against the state of North Dakota over a state law that would ban all medical abortions.<ref>{{cite press release | url=http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-takes-legal-action-to-block-north-dakota-attack-on-women%E2%80%99s | title=Center for Reproductive Rights takes legal action to block North Dakota attack on women's health, abortion rights | publisher=CRR | date=18 July 2011 | access-date=18 September 2013 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130423151117/http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-takes-legal-action-to-block-north-dakota-attack-on-women%E2%80%99s | archive-date=23 April 2013 }}</ref> In July 2013, the CRR, along with the [[Red River Women's Clinic]], filed a lawsuit against the enactment of [[Six-week abortion ban|so-called "fetal heartbeat"]], genetic, and sex selection restrictions on abortions.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/lawsuit-challenges-north-dakotas-abortion-limits.html?_r=0 | title=Lawsuit Challenges North Dakota's Abortion Limits | work=The New York Times | date=25 June 2013 | access-date=18 September 2013 | author=Eckholm. Erik}}</ref> In September 2013, a federal judge dismissed the genetic and sex selection parts of the lawsuit without prejudice.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/judge-dismisses-part-dakota-abortion-lawsuit-20227777 | title=Judge Dismisses Part of N. Dakota Abortion Lawsuit | work=ABC News | date=11 September 2013 | access-date=18 September 2013 | author=MacPherson, James}}</ref>


⚫
In 2011 the CRR joined with the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU) and [[Planned Parenthood]] to challenge a law passed which requires women to get an ultrasound four hours before an abortion. In addition, it requires the doctor to put the ultrasound image within the view of the woman and describe it. The plaintiffs have called it an "ideological message," and a violation of the First Amendment. And since the patient is not actually required to listen to what the doctor describes and can even choose to wear blinders and headphones, the plaintiffs went on to call it a "farce."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.news-record.com/news/article_03c9f696-0bf1-11e3-aaa2-001a4bcf6878.html | title=Update: Ruling on ultrasounds still 'several weeks' off | publisher=News & Record | date=29 August 2013 | access-date=29 August 2013 | author=Lopez, Robert}}</ref>
Under the direction of its president, [[Nancy Northup]], the Center has expanded human rights to its work in the [[United States]]. It is now documenting U.S. rights violations through fact-finding reports and holding the U.S. accountable before U.N. bodies that monitor compliance with international treaty obligations.


⚫
After suing the Obama administration over the restricted access to [[emergency contraception|birth control]], in June 2013 the U.S. Department of Justice ordered that the Obama administration make all forms of emergency contraception available over the counter and without an age restriction.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/obama-administration-plan-b-one-step-over-counter | title=Buying Plan B Will No Longer Require an ID or a Prescription | publisher=Mother Jones | date=10 June 2013 | access-date=2 August 2013 | author=Sheppard, Kate}}</ref>
The Center continually monitors the treatment of reproductive rights in various media<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-northup/misremembering-dr-tiller_b_339284.html |title=Nancy Northup: Misremembering Dr. Tiller: How Law & Order Got It Wrong |publisher=Huffingtonpost.com |date=2009-10-29 |first=Nancy |last=Northup |accessdate=2010-06-11}}</ref> in the US and abroad.


⚫
In recent years, CRR has been one of three primary groups challenging increased state level restrictions to reproductive health and abortion care.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/nancy-northup-abortion-franks-supreme-court | title=Republicans Want to Ban Abortions After 20 Weeks. Here's How One Group Is Fighting Back. | publisher=Mother Jones | date=14 June 2013 | access-date=2 August 2013 | author=Sheppard, Kate}}</ref> In May, the CRR and the ACLU jointly filed suit against a 12-week abortion ban in Arkansas.<ref>{{cite press release | url=https://www.aclu.org/reproductive-freedom/aclu-and-center-reproductive-rights-ask-federal-court-block-arkansas-abortion | title=ACLU and Center for Reproductive Rights Ask Federal Court to Block Arkansas Abortion Ban | publisher=American Civil Liberties Union | date=17 May 2013 | access-date=14 August 2013}}</ref> In June the CRR filed a lawsuit against the state of Kansas to block HB 2253 stating that the abortion restrictions it imposed are unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/06/24/center-for-reproductive-rights-joins-fight-against-kansas-anti-abortion-super-bill/ | title=Center for Reproductive Rights Joins Fight Against Kansas Anti-Abortion Super Bill | date=24 June 2013 | access-date=14 August 2013 | author=Mason Pieklo, Jessica}}</ref> In August a coalition of groups, including the CRR, filed suit in Oklahoma to block enforcement of a law that restricts access to emergency contraception, stating that the law is unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.tulsaworld.com/article.aspx/Lawsuit_would_block_states_new_morning_after_pill_law/20130808_504_0_OKLAHO316390?subj=298 | title=Lawsuit would block state's new morning-after pill law | publisher=Tulsa World | date=8 August 2013 | access-date=15 August 2013 | author=Hoberock, Barbara}}</ref> In August a federal judge blocked the law from going into effect.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/22025792-418/oklahoma-judge-blocks-law-restricting-access-to-morning-after-pill.html | title=Oklahoma judge blocks law restricting access to morning-after pill | publisher=Chicago Sun Times | date=19 August 2013 | access-date=22 August 2013 | agency=Associated Press}}</ref>
⚫
[[Charity Watch]] rates the Center for Reproductive Rights "A-".<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/center-for-reproductive-rights/2 | title=Charity Watch Top Rated Charities | accessdate=5 May 2015 }}</ref>


⚫
In November 2015, the [[United States Supreme Court]] agreed to review stringent restrictions enacted into law by abortion opponents in Texas. Upon coming into force the laws would leave Texas, a state with a population of 27 million, served by only ten clinics, 34 less than the number in service before the laws were enacted. The appeal, handled by the CRR, is U.S. Supreme Court docket number 16-274, ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Cole]].'' It is the first case that the high court has accepted scrutinizing abortion restriction since 2007.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-abortion-idUSKCN0T229F20151113 Supreme court to decide major abortion case for first time since 2007] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151201124742/http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/13/us-usa-court-abortion-idUSKCN0T229F20151113 |date=2015-12-01 }} Lawrence Hurley reporting in [[Reuters]] Fri Nov 13, 2015</ref>
==Campaigns==
⚫
In July, 2011 the CRR filed suit against the state of North Dakota over a state law that would ban all medical abortions.<ref>{{cite press release | url=http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-takes-legal-action-to-block-north-dakota-attack-on-women%E2%80%99s | title=Center for Reproductive Rights takes legal action to block North Dakota attack on women’s health, abortion rights | publisher=CRR | date=18 July 2011 | accessdate=18 September 2013}}</ref> In July 2013, the CRR, along with the [[Red River Women's Clinic]], filed a lawsuit of the enactment of "fetal heartbeat", genetic, and sex selection restrictions on abortions.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/lawsuit-challenges-north-dakotas-abortion-limits.html?_r=0 | title=Lawsuit Challenges North Dakota’s Abortion Limits | publisher=The New York Times | date=25 June 2013 | accessdate=18 September 2013 | author=Eckholm. Erik}}</ref> In September 2013, a federal judge dismissed the genetic and sex selection parts of the lawsuit without prejudice.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/judge-dismisses-part-dakota-abortion-lawsuit-20227777 | title=Judge Dismisses Part of N. Dakota Abortion Lawsuit | publisher=ABC News | date=11 September 2013 | accessdate=18 September 2013 | author=MacPherson, James}}</ref>


⚫
In 2016 the CRR expanded its international program, including the launch of an international litigation campaign that has included the first [[abortion]] case decided by the [[United Nations]] Human Rights Committee and the first case to frame preventable maternal deaths as a [[human rights]] violation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/12/01/ireland_will_pay_damages_to_a_woman_forced_to_travel_abroad_for_an_abortion.html|title=Ireland Will Pay Damages to a Woman Forced to Travel Abroad for an Abortion|last=Cauterucci|first=Christina|date=2016-12-01|newspaper=Slate|language=en-US|issn=1091-2339|access-date=2016-12-10}}</ref>
⚫
In 2011 the CRR joined with the ACLU and [[Planned Parenthood]] to challenge a law passed which requires women to get an ultrasound four hours before an abortion. In addition, it requires the doctor to the put the ultrasound image within the view of the woman and describe it. The plaintiffs have called it an "ideological message," and a violation of the First Amendment. And since the patient is not actually required to listen to what the doctor describes and can even choose to wear blinders and headphones, the plaintiffs went on to call it a "farce."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.news-record.com/news/article_03c9f696-0bf1-11e3-aaa2-001a4bcf6878.html | title=Update: Ruling on ultrasounds still ‘several weeks’ off | publisher=News & Record | date=29 August 2013 | accessdate=29 August 2013 | author=Lopez, Robert}}</ref>

⚫
After suing the Obama administration over the restricted access to [[emergency contraception|birth control]], in June 2013 the U.S. Department of Justice ordered that the Obama administration make all forms of emergency contraception available over the counter and without an age restriction.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/obama-administration-plan-b-one-step-over-counter | title=Buying Plan B Will No Longer Require an ID or a Prescription | publisher=Mother Jones | date=10 June 2013 | accessdate=2 August 2013 | author=Sheppard, Kate}}</ref>

⚫
In recent years, CRR is one of three primary groups challenging increased state level restrictions to reproductive health and abortion care.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/nancy-northup-abortion-franks-supreme-court | title=Republicans Want to Ban Abortions After 20 Weeks. Here's How One Group Is Fighting Back. | publisher=Mother Jones | date=14 June 2013 | accessdate=2 August 2013 | author=Sheppard, Kate}}</ref> In May, along with the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] filed suit against a 12-week abortion ban in Arkansas.<ref>{{cite press release | url=http://www.aclu.org/reproductive-freedom/aclu-and-center-reproductive-rights-ask-federal-court-block-arkansas-abortion | title=ACLU and Center for Reproductive Rights Ask Federal Court to Block Arkansas Abortion Ban | publisher=American Civil Liberties Union | date=17 May 2013 | accessdate=14 August 2013}}</ref> In June the CRR filed a lawsuit against the state of Kansas to block HB 2253 stating that the abortion restrictions it imposed is unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/06/24/center-for-reproductive-rights-joins-fight-against-kansas-anti-abortion-super-bill/ | title=Center for Reproductive Rights Joins Fight Against Kansas Anti-Abortion Super Bill | date=24 June 2013 | accessdate=14 August 2013 | author=Mason Pieklo, Jessica}}</ref> In August a coalition of groups, including the CRR, filed suit in Oklahoma to block enforcement of a law that restricts access to emergency contraception, stating that the law is unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.tulsaworld.com/article.aspx/Lawsuit_would_block_states_new_morning_after_pill_law/20130808_504_0_OKLAHO316390?subj=298 | title=Lawsuit would block state's new morning-after pill law | publisher=Tulsa World | date=8 August 2013 | accessdate=15 August 2013 | author=Hoberock, Barbara}}</ref> In August a federal judge blocked the law from going into effect.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/22025792-418/oklahoma-judge-blocks-law-restricting-access-to-morning-after-pill.html | title=Oklahoma judge blocks law restricting access to morning-after pill | publisher=Chicago Sun Times | date=19 August 2013 | accessdate=22 August 2013 | author=Associated Press}}</ref>

In 2012 the CRR started the "Draw the Line" campaign to bring awareness to reproductive rights.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/10/abortion-rights-group-launches-reproductive-bill-rights | title=Abortion Rights Group Launches "Bill of Reproductive Rights" | publisher=Mother Jones | date=9 October 2012 | accessdate=2 August 2013 | author=Sheppard, Kate}}</ref>

⚫
In November 2015 the [[United States Supreme Court]] agreed to review stringent restrictions enacted into law by abortion opponents in Texas. Upon coming into force the laws would leave Texas, a state with a population of 27 million, served by only ten clinics, 34 less than the number in service before the laws were enacted. The appeal, handled by the Center for Reproductive Rights, is U.S. Supreme Court docket number 16-274, ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Cole]].'' It is the first case that the high court has accepted scrutinizing abortion restriction since 2007.<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/13/us-usa-court-abortion-idUSKCN0T229F20151113 Supreme court to decide major abortion case for first time since 2007] Lawrence Hurley reporting in [[Reuters]] Fri Nov 13, 2015</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 47: Line 47:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Human rights organizations]]
[[Category:Human rights organizations based in the United States]]
[[Category:Reproductive rights organizations]]
[[Category:Reproductive rights organizations]]
[[Category:Non-profit organizations based in New York City]]
[[Category:Non-profit organizations based in New York City]]
[[Category:Pro-choice organizations in the United States]]
[[Category:Abortion-rights organizations in the United States]]
[[Category:1992 establishments in New York City]]

Latest revision as of 16:28, 14 November 2023

Center for Reproductive Rights
FormationMay 14, 1992; 32 years ago (1992-05-14)[1]
TypeNonprofit organization
13-3669731[2]
Legal status501(c)(3)[2]
PurposeThe advancement of reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right.[3]
HeadquartersNew York City
Region served
Global
Nancy Northup[4]
Amy Metzler Ritter[4]
Revenue (2018)
$34,071,507[3]
Expenses (2018)$28,873,813[3]
Employees (2017)
179[3]
Volunteers (2017)
19[3]
Websitereproductiverights.org
Formerly called
Center for Reproductive Law and Policy[5]

The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) is a global legal advocacy organization, headquartered in New York City,[6] that seeks to advance reproductive rights, such as abortion. The organization's stated mission is to "use the law to advance reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right that all governments are legally obligated to protect, respect, and fulfill."[7] Founded by Janet Benshoof in 1992, its original name was the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.[5]

CharityWatch rates the Center for Reproductive Rights "B+".[8]

History

[edit]

In July 2011, the CRR filed suit against the state of North Dakota over a state law that would ban all medical abortions.[9] In July 2013, the CRR, along with the Red River Women's Clinic, filed a lawsuit against the enactment of so-called "fetal heartbeat", genetic, and sex selection restrictions on abortions.[10] In September 2013, a federal judge dismissed the genetic and sex selection parts of the lawsuit without prejudice.[11]

In 2011 the CRR joined with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Planned Parenthood to challenge a law passed which requires women to get an ultrasound four hours before an abortion. In addition, it requires the doctor to put the ultrasound image within the view of the woman and describe it. The plaintiffs have called it an "ideological message," and a violation of the First Amendment. And since the patient is not actually required to listen to what the doctor describes and can even choose to wear blinders and headphones, the plaintiffs went on to call it a "farce."[12]

After suing the Obama administration over the restricted access to birth control, in June 2013 the U.S. Department of Justice ordered that the Obama administration make all forms of emergency contraception available over the counter and without an age restriction.[13]

In recent years, CRR has been one of three primary groups challenging increased state level restrictions to reproductive health and abortion care.[14] In May, the CRR and the ACLU jointly filed suit against a 12-week abortion ban in Arkansas.[15] In June the CRR filed a lawsuit against the state of Kansas to block HB 2253 stating that the abortion restrictions it imposed are unconstitutional.[16] In August a coalition of groups, including the CRR, filed suit in Oklahoma to block enforcement of a law that restricts access to emergency contraception, stating that the law is unconstitutional.[17] In August a federal judge blocked the law from going into effect.[18]

In November 2015, the United States Supreme Court agreed to review stringent restrictions enacted into law by abortion opponents in Texas. Upon coming into force the laws would leave Texas, a state with a population of 27 million, served by only ten clinics, 34 less than the number in service before the laws were enacted. The appeal, handled by the CRR, is U.S. Supreme Court docket number 16-274, Whole Woman's Health v. Cole. It is the first case that the high court has accepted scrutinizing abortion restriction since 2007.[19]

In 2016 the CRR expanded its international program, including the launch of an international litigation campaign that has included the first abortion case decided by the United Nations Human Rights Committee and the first case to frame preventable maternal deaths as a human rights violation.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Center for Reproductive Rights". Division of Corporations. Delaware Department of State. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  2. ^ a b "Center for Reproductive Rights". Tax Exempt Organization Search. Internal Revenue Service. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  3. ^ a b c d e "Form 990: Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax". The Center for Reproductive Rights. Internal Revenue Service. June 30, 2018.
  4. ^ a b "Center Leadership & Staff". Center for Reproductive Rights. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  5. ^ a b Wadler, Joyce (November 4, 1998). "Public Lives: Defending the Defenders of Abortion Rights". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
  6. ^ "Ohio and Texas are among the battleground states for abortion rights next year". Newsweek. 2016-12-10. Retrieved 2016-12-10.
  7. ^ "About Us". Center for Reproductive Rights. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
  8. ^ "Charity Watch Top Rated Charities". Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  9. ^ "Center for Reproductive Rights takes legal action to block North Dakota attack on women's health, abortion rights" (Press release). CRR. 18 July 2011. Archived from the original on 23 April 2013. Retrieved 18 September 2013.
  10. ^ Eckholm. Erik (25 June 2013). "Lawsuit Challenges North Dakota's Abortion Limits". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 September 2013.
  11. ^ MacPherson, James (11 September 2013). "Judge Dismisses Part of N. Dakota Abortion Lawsuit". ABC News. Retrieved 18 September 2013.
  12. ^ Lopez, Robert (29 August 2013). "Update: Ruling on ultrasounds still 'several weeks' off". News & Record. Retrieved 29 August 2013.
  13. ^ Sheppard, Kate (10 June 2013). "Buying Plan B Will No Longer Require an ID or a Prescription". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
  14. ^ Sheppard, Kate (14 June 2013). "Republicans Want to Ban Abortions After 20 Weeks. Here's How One Group Is Fighting Back". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
  15. ^ "ACLU and Center for Reproductive Rights Ask Federal Court to Block Arkansas Abortion Ban" (Press release). American Civil Liberties Union. 17 May 2013. Retrieved 14 August 2013.
  16. ^ Mason Pieklo, Jessica (24 June 2013). "Center for Reproductive Rights Joins Fight Against Kansas Anti-Abortion Super Bill". Retrieved 14 August 2013.
  17. ^ Hoberock, Barbara (8 August 2013). "Lawsuit would block state's new morning-after pill law". Tulsa World. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
  18. ^ "Oklahoma judge blocks law restricting access to morning-after pill". Chicago Sun Times. Associated Press. 19 August 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
  19. ^ Supreme court to decide major abortion case for first time since 2007 Archived 2015-12-01 at the Wayback Machine Lawrence Hurley reporting in Reuters Fri Nov 13, 2015
  20. ^ Cauterucci, Christina (2016-12-01). "Ireland Will Pay Damages to a Woman Forced to Travel Abroad for an Abortion". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 2016-12-10.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Center_for_Reproductive_Rights&oldid=1185105737"