Individual terror: Difference between revisions
Lovok Sovok (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Reverted edits by Landberger Ring (talk) to last version by InternetArchiveBot |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{terrorism}} |
|||
{{under construction}} |
|||
In [[leftist]] terminology, '''individual terror''', a form of [[revolutionary terror]], |
In [[leftist]] terminology, '''individual terror''', a form of [[revolutionary terror]], is the murder of isolated individuals with the goal of promotion of a political movement, of provoking political changes, up to [[political revolution]].<ref name=ls>[[Lev Sedov]] "On the [[Moscow Trials]]," Ch. 10, [http://marx.org/history/etol/writers/sedov/works/red/ch10.htm "Marxism and Individual Terror"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120312045057/http://marx.org/history/etol/writers/sedov/works/red/ch10.htm |date=2012-03-12 }}</ref><ref name=zi>[[Ze'ev Iviansky]], "Individual Terror: Concept and Typology," {{doi|10.1177/002200947701200102}} Journal of Contemporary History January 1977 vol. 12 no. 1 43-63</ref> As such, it differs from other forms of [[targeted killing]], in particular, the close type of individual murder, the ancient practice of [[political assassination]].<ref name=zi/> |
||
==Individual terror vs. political assassination== |
==Individual terror vs. political assassination== |
||
Many authors do not draw distinction between types of political assassinations and furthermore, and there is no full consensus on the issue.<ref name=nbe>Political assassinations by Jews: a rhetorical device for justice By Nachman Ben-Yehuda, {{ISBN|0-7914-1166-4}}, 1993, [https://books.google.com/books?id=P7XF6axF-m0C&pg=PA37]</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Ze'ev Iviansky]] attempted to draw a distinction as follows. While revolutionary individual terror and traditional political assassination share the common goal, a major political change, they differ in various aspects: tactics, methods, role, view on the society, and significance of an individual act. Most of the differences stem from the immediate purpose of an individual act. |
|||
| ⚫ | In traditional political assassination the target of the killing is a central political figure, such as the king or [[dictator]], whose removal would give way to political changes, and as such the choice of the target is of primary importance. The ultimate goal is to hit the regime represented by the target. Whereas in individual terror, the choice of the target, while important, is secondary to the primary goal, which is to bring the attention of the public to a political movement and to promote the political movement. |
||
This key distinction explains differences in tactics. While traditional political assassination may well be clandestine, the efficiency of revolutionary individual terror in a greater extent depends on the publicity of the act.<ref name=zi/> |
|||
The target of a political assassination is usually a very specific individual, while the target of an act of terrorism is not.<ref name="google">{{cite book|title=Political Assassinations by Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice|author=Ben-Yehuda, N.|date=1993|publisher=State University of New York Press|isbn=9780791411667|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P7XF6axF-m0C|page=37|access-date=2014-10-18}}</ref> |
|||
[[David C. Rapoport]] (1971) drew the difference as follows: "...the assassin destroys men who are corrupting the system, while the terrorist destroys a system which has already corrupted everyone it touches..."<ref name="google2">{{cite book|title=Political Assassinations by Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice|author=Ben-Yehuda, N.|date=1993|publisher=State University of New York Press|isbn=9780791411667|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P7XF6axF-m0C|page=37|access-date=2015-04-08}}</ref> |
|||
==History== |
==History== |
||
The roots of individual terror as revolutionary tactics lie in the second half of the 19th century in [[Europe]].<ref name=zi/> Part of its theoretical base was "[[propaganda by deed]]" put forth by the ideologists of [[anarchism]]. Different revolutionary parties had different attitude to individual terror, for political, |
The roots of individual terror as revolutionary tactics lie in the second half of the 19th century in [[Europe]].<ref name=zi/> Part of its theoretical base was "[[propaganda by deed]]" put forth by the ideologists of [[anarchism]]. Different revolutionary parties had different attitude to individual terror, for political, tactical, moral, and other reasons.<ref name=ls/> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
| Line 12: | Line 22: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{ |
{{Reflist}} |
||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
*"The Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party before the First World War" |
*"The Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party before the First World War," by Manfred Hildermeier, {{ISBN|3-8258-4259-2}}, LIT Verlag Münster, 2000. |
||
** Its Section 12.3.2: [ |
** Its Section 12.3.2: [https://books.google.com/books?id=xCAp1vedU70C&pg=PA323 "Individual terror: Anachronistic politics"] discusses the change of the attitude to individual terror within the Russian [[Social Revolutionary Party]] |
||
*[[Walter Laqueur]], ''A History of Terrorism'' |
|||
** Discusses individual terror in 19th century [[anarchism]], [[Marxism]] and other left-wing movements |
|||
*Ze'ev Iviansky, ''Individual Terror, Theory and Practice'', 1977 |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Terrorism by |
[[Category:Terrorism by method]] |
||
[[Category:Terrorism tactics]] |
[[Category:Terrorism tactics]] |
||
[[Category:Revolutionary tactics]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 12 April 2023
| Part of a series on |
| Terrorism |
|---|
In leftist terminology, individual terror, a form of revolutionary terror, is the murder of isolated individuals with the goal of promotion of a political movement, of provoking political changes, up to political revolution.[1][2] As such, it differs from other forms of targeted killing, in particular, the close type of individual murder, the ancient practice of political assassination.[2]
Individual terror vs. political assassination
[edit]Many authors do not draw distinction between types of political assassinations and furthermore, and there is no full consensus on the issue.[3]
Ze'ev Iviansky attempted to draw a distinction as follows. While revolutionary individual terror and traditional political assassination share the common goal, a major political change, they differ in various aspects: tactics, methods, role, view on the society, and significance of an individual act. Most of the differences stem from the immediate purpose of an individual act.
In traditional political assassination the target of the killing is a central political figure, such as the king or dictator, whose removal would give way to political changes, and as such the choice of the target is of primary importance. The ultimate goal is to hit the regime represented by the target. Whereas in individual terror, the choice of the target, while important, is secondary to the primary goal, which is to bring the attention of the public to a political movement and to promote the political movement.
This key distinction explains differences in tactics. While traditional political assassination may well be clandestine, the efficiency of revolutionary individual terror in a greater extent depends on the publicity of the act.[2]
The target of a political assassination is usually a very specific individual, while the target of an act of terrorism is not.[4]
David C. Rapoport (1971) drew the difference as follows: "...the assassin destroys men who are corrupting the system, while the terrorist destroys a system which has already corrupted everyone it touches..."[5]
History
[edit]The roots of individual terror as revolutionary tactics lie in the second half of the 19th century in Europe.[2] Part of its theoretical base was "propaganda by deed" put forth by the ideologists of anarchism. Different revolutionary parties had different attitude to individual terror, for political, tactical, moral, and other reasons.[1]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Lev Sedov "On the Moscow Trials," Ch. 10, "Marxism and Individual Terror" Archived 2012-03-12 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b c d Ze'ev Iviansky, "Individual Terror: Concept and Typology," doi:10.1177/002200947701200102 Journal of Contemporary History January 1977 vol. 12 no. 1 43-63
- ^ Political assassinations by Jews: a rhetorical device for justice By Nachman Ben-Yehuda, ISBN 0-7914-1166-4, 1993, [1]
- ^ Ben-Yehuda, N. (1993). Political Assassinations by Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice. State University of New York Press. p. 37. ISBN 9780791411667. Retrieved 2014-10-18.
- ^ Ben-Yehuda, N. (1993). Political Assassinations by Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice. State University of New York Press. p. 37. ISBN 9780791411667. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
Further reading
[edit]- "The Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party before the First World War," by Manfred Hildermeier, ISBN 3-8258-4259-2, LIT Verlag Münster, 2000.
- Its Section 12.3.2: "Individual terror: Anachronistic politics" discusses the change of the attitude to individual terror within the Russian Social Revolutionary Party
- Walter Laqueur, A History of Terrorism
- Ze'ev Iviansky, Individual Terror, Theory and Practice, 1977
