Jump to content

Talk:Creationism: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 January 2024

  • curprev 00:4900:49, 7 January 2024 Cewbot talk contribs m 12,261 bytes −112 Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 10 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 10 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Sociology}}, {{WikiProject Skepticism}}, {{WikiProject Theology}}, {{WikiProject Christianity}}, {{WikiProject Islam}}, {{WikiProject Zoroastrianism}}, {{WikiProject Creationism}}, {{WikiProject Alternative Views}}. undo

1 November 2023

26 June 2023

5 January 2023

30 December 2022

6 November 2022

5 November 2022

22 October 2022

26 September 2022

25 September 2022

22 September 2022

1 August 2022

22 June 2022

  • curprev 08:4708:47, 22 June 2022 Doug Weller talk contribs 10,549 bytes +586 /* I challenge the "neutrality" (Article Policy) of the word MYTH when referring to the Genesis account of creation. There are several definitions, and the one chosen by your source, a skeptic of creationism, is derogatory of the Genesis account. A common understanding of the word MYTH is that it's an invented story, idea, or concept; an imaginary or fictitious thing or person; an unproved or false collective belief that is used to justify a social institution.{Dictionary.com} Article is tain... undo
  • curprev 08:4408:44, 22 June 2022 Girth Summit talk contribs 9,963 bytes 0 Neutrality: typo undo
  • curprev 08:4308:43, 22 June 2022 Girth Summit talk contribs 9,963 bytes +1,179 reply undo
  • curprev 06:5506:55, 22 June 2022 SineBot talk contribs m 8,784 bytes +320 Signing comment by Roglenoff - "/* I challenge the "neutrality" (Article Policy) of the word MYTH when referring to the Genesis account of creation. There are several definitions, and the one chosen by your source, a skeptic of creationism, is derogatory of the Genesis account. A common understanding of the word MYTH is that it's an invented story, idea, or concept; an imaginary or fictitious thing or person; an unproved or false collective belief that is used to justify a... undo
  • curprev 06:5406:54, 22 June 2022 Roglenoff talk contribs 8,464 bytes +718 /* I challenge the "neutrality" (Article Policy) of the word MYTH when referring to the Genesis account of creation. There are several definitions, and the one chosen by your source, a skeptic of creationism, is derogatory of the Genesis account. A common understanding of the word MYTH is that it's an invented story, idea, or concept; an imaginary or fictitious thing or person; an unproved or false collective belief that is used to justify a social institution.{Dictionary.com} Article is tain... undo

13 April 2022

15 March 2022

10 March 2022

17 February 2022

25 January 2022

28 September 2021

27 September 2021

15 March 2021

19 January 2021

16 December 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)