Talk:Binary-code compatibility: Revision history

28 January 2024

• curprev 16:0016:00, 28 January 2024‎ Cewbot talk contribs‎ m 25,760 bytes +30‎ Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

4 May 2023

• curprev 17:5717:57, 4 May 2023‎ Widefox talk contribs‎ 25,730 bytes +23‎ Assessment: Computing (Rater) undo

29 March 2022

• curprev 03:4903:49, 29 March 2022‎ MalnadachBot talk contribs‎ m 25,707 bytes +2‎ Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

26 November 2021

• curprev 00:5700:57, 26 November 2021‎ MaxEnt talk contribs‎ 25,705 bytes +311‎ →‎Lead too discursive: new section undo

18 September 2019

• curprev 19:4319:43, 18 September 2019‎ Colin M talk contribs‎ 25,394 bytes +1,466‎ →‎Requested move 19 August 2019: closing as no consensus - I don't think relisting again is likely to swing the needle on this undo

3 September 2019

• curprev 10:5710:57, 3 September 2019‎ Andrewa talk contribs‎ 23,928 bytes +335‎ →‎Requested move 19 August 2019: oppose undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

27 August 2019

• curprev 09:4009:40, 27 August 2019‎ Newslinger talk contribs‎ 23,593 bytes +247‎ →‎Requested move 19 August 2019: Relist undo

19 August 2019

• curprev 16:5916:59, 19 August 2019‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 23,346 bytes +431‎ →‎Requested move 19 August 2019: "Executable code compatibility"? On the other hand, is code for a decimal machine using BCD really binary, when push comes to shove? undo
• curprev 14:2414:24, 19 August 2019‎ Chatul talk contribs‎ 22,915 bytes +333‎ Request to move article and broaden scope undo

27 May 2017

• curprev 03:3903:39, 27 May 2017‎ Mikhail Ryazanov talk contribs‎ m 22,582 bytes 0‎ Mikhail Ryazanov moved page Talk:Binary code compatibility to Talk:Binary-code compatibility: MOS:HYPHEN undo

12 April 2015

• curprev 20:5420:54, 12 April 2015‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ m 22,582 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:4520:45, 12 April 2015‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ m 22,583 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo

24 March 2014

• curprev 09:4609:46, 24 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ m 22,583 bytes +1‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 09:4509:45, 24 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 22,582 bytes +685‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out: Same chip, but slower.. undo

20 March 2014

• curprev 21:5421:54, 20 March 2014‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 21,897 bytes +771‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out: There's often been cases where you have to be careful to avoid future compatibility problems when coding (or generating code). undo
• curprev 21:2421:24, 20 March 2014‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 21,126 bytes +2,892‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out: Replies. undo
• curprev 21:2121:21, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 18,234 bytes +28‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 21:0221:02, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 18,206 bytes +196‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 20:5520:55, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 18,010 bytes +845‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 20:4620:46, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 17,165 bytes +3‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 20:4220:42, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 17,162 bytes +22‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 20:4120:41, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 17,140 bytes +126‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 20:3520:35, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 17,014 bytes +734‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out undo
• curprev 16:5816:58, 20 March 2014‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 16,280 bytes +2,354‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out: Binary compatibility doesn't include CPU speed; that way lies madness. undo
• curprev 09:5809:58, 20 March 2014‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 13,926 bytes +915‎ →‎"More-or-less compatible" taken out: new section undo

20 December 2013

• curprev 00:0200:02, 20 December 2013‎ ChrisGualtieri talk contribs‎ m 13,011 bytes +1‎ Stub uprated to Start using AWB undo

2 December 2013

• curprev 22:5522:55, 2 December 2013‎ BDD talk contribs‎ 13,010 bytes +772‎ →‎Move?: closing discussion, result was no consensus undo

20 November 2013

• curprev 11:4111:41, 20 November 2013‎ Amakuru talk contribs‎ 12,238 bytes +74‎ →‎Move?: relist undo
• curprev 11:4011:40, 20 November 2013‎ Amakuru talk contribs‎ 12,164 bytes +62‎ →‎Move?: relist undo

15 November 2013

• curprev 11:4411:44, 15 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 12,102 bytes +929‎ →‎Move?: - Ngrams undo
• curprev 11:2711:27, 15 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 11,173 bytes +276‎ →‎Related/possible ref: new section undo
• curprev 11:1211:12, 15 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 10,897 bytes +798‎ →‎Move? undo

14 November 2013

• curprev 23:3323:33, 14 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 10,099 bytes +285‎ →‎Move? undo
• curprev 20:0120:01, 14 November 2013‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 9,814 bytes +218‎ →‎Move?: Either title will mean *somebody* has to pipe a link. undo
• curprev 09:3609:36, 14 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 9,596 bytes +1,336‎ →‎Move? undo

12 November 2013

• curprev 20:4620:46, 12 November 2013‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 8,260 bytes +515‎ →‎Move?: +1 for Anthony Appleyard's comment. undo
• curprev 16:0116:01, 12 November 2013‎ Anthony Appleyard talk contribs‎ 7,745 bytes −2‎ →‎Move?: ed undo
• curprev 16:0116:01, 12 November 2013‎ Anthony Appleyard talk contribs‎ 7,747 bytes +536‎ →‎Move?: new section undo
• curprev 13:3713:37, 12 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ m 7,211 bytes 0‎ Comp.arch moved page Talk:Binary code compatibilityBinary compatible to Talk:Binary code compatibility over redirect: I made an error, trying to move to "Binary compatible" undo
• curprev 13:3613:36, 12 November 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ m 7,211 bytes 0‎ Comp.arch moved page Talk:Binary code compatibility to Talk:Binary code compatibilityBinary compatible: "Binary compatible" already redirects here (I just changed that redirect) and is the usual term. It used to redirect to "Binary file"-sectio... undo

5 November 2013

• curprev 22:5022:50, 5 November 2013‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 7,211 bytes +60‎ →‎Mac OS X used emulation or even dynamic translation? Not vitualizatrion(?): And that's more references than the rest of the article has.... undo
• curprev 22:4422:44, 5 November 2013‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 7,151 bytes +258‎ →‎Mac OS X used emulation or even dynamic translation? Not vitualizatrion(?): Yes, virtualization, with two references. No more discussion of the possibility that the claim might be proven wrong without citations proving it wrong, please. undo

30 October 2013

• curprev 23:4623:46, 30 October 2013‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 6,893 bytes +540‎ →‎Mac OS X used emulation or even dynamic translation? Not vitualizatrion(?): And emulation is the same sort of thing here - the host OS doesn't support apps from the guest OS, the guest OS is running in a virtual/emulated machine and running its apps. undo

29 October 2013

• curprev 17:3417:34, 29 October 2013‎ Guy Harris talk contribs‎ 6,353 bytes +424‎ →‎Mac OS X used emulation or even dynamic translation? Not vitualizatrion(?): No, this is more like virtualization; there's no translation, as it's running PPC code on a PPC processor. undo
• curprev 16:2016:20, 29 October 2013‎ Comp.arch talk contribs‎ 5,929 bytes +780‎ Took (wrong) example out - no need to readd(?) undo

18 February 2010

• curprev 23:3723:37, 18 February 2010‎ Dava4444 talk contribs‎ 5,149 bytes +337‎ →‎Binary Compatible Operating Systems undo

14 November 2009

• curprev 21:2721:27, 14 November 2009‎ Dava4444 talk contribs‎ 4,812 bytes +4‎ →‎Binary Compatible Operating Systems undo
• curprev 19:4019:40, 14 November 2009‎ Dava4444 talk contribs‎ 4,808 bytes +368‎ →‎Requested move undo

10 September 2009

• curprev 22:0522:05, 10 September 2009‎ C. A. Russell talk contribs‎ m 4,440 bytes +1‎ →‎Very weak definition: insert linebreak undo
• curprev 22:0422:04, 10 September 2009‎ C. A. Russell talk contribs‎ 4,439 bytes +1,253‎ →‎Very weak definition: reply undo