Jump to content

Eel as food: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 August 2024

9 August 2024

17 July 2024

  • curprev 17:0917:09, 17 July 202476.14.58.5 talk 14,953 bytes +1 Stock used in a culinary sense was linked incorrectly to Fish Stocks, referring to conservation; link was changed to Stock_(food) rather than Fish Stocks. undo

25 June 2024

  • curprev 04:4204:42, 25 June 2024Epipelagic talk contribsm 14,952 bytes +405 reinstate inappropriate deletion of material. This passage is about religious proscriptions on eels which applied in two radically different historic times and cultural settings. To wipe out all mention of one, as well as the citation which clarifies the context, merely because both ultimately originate from a common source, makes no sense. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 01:0901:09, 25 June 2024Bzweebl talk contribs 14,547 bytes −405 The prohibition of eating eels in Judaism is because of that section of the Old Testament (which isn’t specific to the King James translation) undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

23 May 2024

7 February 2024

30 November 2023

25 October 2023

21 October 2023

24 August 2023

13 August 2023

8 March 2023

22 February 2023

15 February 2023

30 January 2023

7 January 2023

19 August 2022

14 August 2022

9 August 2022

7 July 2022

24 June 2022

6 June 2022

2 June 2022

1 June 2022

30 May 2022

15 May 2022

27 March 2022

15 March 2022

12 February 2022

22 January 2022

  • curprev 11:3011:30, 22 January 2022No essential nature talk contribs 13,431 bytes +148 →‎Sustainability: Added quote from https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/wildlife-explorer/freshwater-fish/eel because the quote implied only Greenpeace consider it endangered, & had it on their own endangered list. Whereas it's actually listed in this highly endangered category on this most authoritative list. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 January 2022

16 July 2021

11 May 2021

19 April 2021

23 March 2021

7 January 2021

4 January 2021

  • curprev 06:0306:03, 4 January 2021Bukharian talk contribs 13,315 bytes −56 Removed details unsupported by source. There is no indication in the source regarding beliefs of eel physiology. Source does not mention eels. Removed "which were erroneously believed to lack fins or scales." undo

3 January 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)