Jump to content

Southern belle: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 September 2021

30 August 2021

28 August 2021

20 July 2021

4 July 2021

2 July 2021

6 June 2021

14 May 2021

13 May 2021

5 May 2021

3 May 2021

29 April 2021

  • curprev 05:4205:42, 29 April 2021 Red-tailed hawk talk contribs 5,407 bytes +1,256 Undid revision 1020455883 by 24.216.95.205 (talk) the previous items seem to be cited by RS, so deletion seems a bit odd. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 05:3605:36, 29 April 2021 24.216.95.205 talk 4,151 bytes −1,256 Why did completely unfounded completely irrelevant unfair hateful unfounded statements about ‘skin color preferences’ have to be allowed to violate and abuse women of a certain region and culture and push lies? There are Southern Belles of all tones and colors and we do not discriminate down here. The Southern Belle has class, charm and wit. She is refined, respectful, polite and courteous. Family, marriage and religion are cherished and dear to the heart loyally. Southern Belles are beauti... undo Tags: Reverted section blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 April 2021

16 April 2021

9 April 2021

5 April 2021

29 March 2021

8 March 2021

4 March 2021

23 February 2021

22 February 2021

16 February 2021

12 January 2021

24 December 2020

2 December 2020

15 July 2020

30 June 2020

26 June 2020

25 June 2020

16 May 2020

13 May 2020

5 April 2020

31 January 2020

  • curprev 05:3805:38, 31 January 2020 NSJE 19 talk contribs 6,142 bytes +7 took out ‘stock character’. to allow someone to say that Southern Belles are fictitious is incredibly ignorant and insulting towards an entire demographic and culture. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 05:3105:31, 31 January 2020 NSJE 19 talk contribs 6,135 bytes −35 took out ‘stock character’ WHICH IS TOTALLY INACCURATE, DISRESPECTFUL TO OUR COUNTRY AND MANY WOMEN WHO ARE SOUTHERN BELLES, IGNORANT OF ITS TRUE MEANING AND EXISTENCE, AND THIS SUDDEN, COMPLETELY INACCURATE CHANGE WAS MOST LIKELY MADE BY SOMEONE OUT OF JEALOUSY TO DISCREDIT AND UNDERMINE AN ENTIRE CULTURE AND DEMOGRAPHIC OF WOMEN. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

9 December 2019

14 October 2019

22 September 2019

11 May 2019

7 May 2019

27 April 2019

26 April 2019

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)