User talk:Rswarbrick
TUSC token f03b13e6b539ab3b8c1562d9ca0eb23d
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Lemon battery.svg
[edit]Hi. Would you be willing to create a more positive version of the lemon battery image, which is presently the lead of the lemon battery article? Technically speaking, your image is incorrect: a lemon battery can illuminate a tungsten filament light-bulb if everything is done correctly, but no one would bother with this anymore. To get an LED to light, one normally puts 3 lemon batteries in series. For a single lemon battery, all you can usually do is measure its voltage. So a positive image would just show a voltmeter reading 1.00 Volts. Are you interested in creating this? Easchiff (talk) 00:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Actually I made the version that's up at the moment following an existing (low quality) gif. I could make a version with a voltage measurement if you'd like (or you could?). That said, a voltage of 1V is not much use when there's a huge internal resistance, which I believe is the case for fruit cells. Maybe it'd be nicer to have an image of three lemons powering an LED? It seems more interesting than "ooh look, a number comes out". That's just my opinion anyway. Rswarbrick (talk) 10:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- I liked the style of your image, and I like your ideas about new possibilities. Your comment about internal resistance is undoubtedly correct. Students often use single galvanized nails and single copper wires, which don't have much area inside the lemon, and hence have lower short-circuit currents from the battery. Your image shows larger, flat electrodes, which is what I actually use; I teach at a university. Anyway, an image showing 3 lemons operating an LED would be good, but it is some work to design and execute it. I've started to revise that article; it's heavily used, probably by students looking up science projects and homework. If you decide to go for it, the new image could be part of a new version that's a little more helpful for the students. cheers, Easchiff (talk) 10:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- How about something like this: Image:Lemon_Battery_With_LED.svg? (In particular, can you check I've got the leads the right way round? I always get the anodes and cathodes mixed up, and it matters with an LED!) Rswarbrick (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- That's a great diagram! I think you can expect that it will be swiped thousands of times per year for science fair projects, etc.. I'll carefully check the polarity and write again; I don't recall these things off the top of my head. Thanks for your work - Easchiff (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I've checked, and I think you got the polarities right. thanks again, Easchiff (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- How about something like this: Image:Lemon_Battery_With_LED.svg? (In particular, can you check I've got the leads the right way round? I always get the anodes and cathodes mixed up, and it matters with an LED!) Rswarbrick (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:2dof sketch.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Rswarbrick. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rswarbrick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]The file File:Zobel (11) Typical chain.svg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)