Jump to content

User talk:Maxeto0910

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Maxeto0910 and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 15:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
re 80.43.81.130 (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Nomination for Deletion

[edit]

The redirect Apple reinvents the phone. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Apple reinvents the phone. until a consensus is reached. Mia Mahey (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canada

[edit]

I have no recollection of that edit, I must have misclicked completely and not noticed. Sorry about that. Canterbury Tail talk 02:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency vs. work

[edit]

Since I don't want to clog the edit summaries:

  1. Of course, it's better to totally fix something that got broken rather than simply revert it to a partially unbroken version. You're presently making the article consistent, and the article takes 20 seconds to load on my computer. These are minor reasons one may choose to revert+inform instead. I would assume it's possible that net editor work is ultimately lower.
  2. On the other hand, I don't think it makes sense to worry about your edits that only consist of errors being reverted. Something being consistently incorrect style-wise is almost always clearly worse than it being inconsistently correct.

Cheers! Remsense 03:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After having read your linked guideline, I actually now think there was absolutely nothing wrong with my edits at all. I quote: "Values and units used as compound modifiers are hyphenated only where the unit is given as a whole word [...]"
All instances of a hyphen use used whole words. When I wrote my dummy edit, I only read the first bullet point of the guideline and thought that the reason why you reverted my edits was that there was a special symbol for suspended hyphens which I hadn't used. Maxeto0910 (talk) 03:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
when two compound modifiers are separated (two- and three-digit number) seems pretty plain to me. Remsense 03:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. When two compound modifiers are separated, we should use suspended hyphens, which I did. Maxeto0910 (talk) 03:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, goodness gracious. This is what I get for glancing at diffs. Feel free to put me in the WP:STOCKS for this one. I was reading it the wrong way around—the strikethrough interfered with visibility of the hyphens. No excuse for that, sorry! Remsense 03:17, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]