User talk:LOBOSKYJOJO
SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!
- WikiProject_Politics (project page, talk page)
- WikiProject_Biography (project page, talk page)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Use sentence case in headings, and cite reliable sources
[edit]Headings should use sentence case not title case, per MOS:HEADCAPS and MOS:HEAD. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Verifiability § Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources to avoid citing non-reliable sources. For example, the website www.whatishumanresource.com, which you cited in this edit, is self-published and is not a reliable source by any measure. Biogeographist (talk) 02:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please, review our policy about reliable sources. If you have questions, ask for help; many of the sources you are adding to article are not at all reliable. ElKevbo (talk) 02:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Close paraphrasing
[edit]Hi, please read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. MPS1992 (talk) 15:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Take that jack daniels Roundnutz04 (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Trump-centered material
[edit]I'm sorry to have reverted your well-sourced and sensible work (I wasn't the only one, however.) I hope the following rationale makes sense to you.
High-level articles that do not have separate sections about the policies of various administrations should not have a section added about Trump's policies. Insofar as these have changed the educational landscape, the article should be updated to reflect current realities. Insofar as they reflect proposed changes they could be incorporated as such into the relevant subsections.
Please feel free to integrate your work appropriately (perhaps sometimes into other, less high-level, more politically focused articles, such as that on Trump or on political policies on education). It is solid research. Best wishes Clean Copytalk 03:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Section headers in sentence case
[edit]Could you review any edits where you added a section header and change this to sentence case (i.e. only the first word and proper nouns capitalized)? It would save others having to clean these up. Thanks. Clean Copytalk 03:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi LOBOSKYJOJO! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
That looks like a very good edit on the Space colonization article. For someone with relatively few edits (assuming that you have no other accounts) I am impressed. Please keep up the good work. Pine✉ 01:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 06:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hi LOBOSKYJOJO! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
October 2018
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your recent additions to several articles have not been focussed on the main purpose of each article, but instead seem to be unrelated or only partially related snippets. Plesse make sure that your edits are relevant. Andyjsmith (talk) 20:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Andyjsmith (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Free Appropriate Public Education
[edit]Hi, there are a couple of sentences in your recent addition to Free Appropriate Public Education that don't make sense. When you get a chance, will you please clarify the following:
- "The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in said case that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act provides disabled students the right to more than just token progress from one year to the following year." This is missing a verb. Did you mean the SC's decision is that the act provides?
- "Individualized Education Programs must be fittingly motivated because of the child’s condition like the progress from one grade to the next is ambitious for majority of school kids in the classroom." I would fix this, but I can't tell what it's trying to say.
I have fixed numerous other errors in your addition, and would very much appreciate it if you'd start putting punctuation in front of citations, not after, so as to save other editors unnecessary cleanup. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, LOBOSKYJOJO. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
[edit] Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Space colonization. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Exploration of Mars, you may be blocked from editing. Most of your edits are reverted because they are extremely poor. This is disruptive. You can see that this is happening so why are you continuing to do it?
For example on "Exploration of Mars" you added GENERIC material in the WRONG PLACE and ignoring the fact that Insight was ALREADY IN THE ARTICLE. This happens again and again. Either you don't understand how to edit articles or you just don't care, but either way you must STOP.
Sorry to shout but you don't seem to pay any attention to polite requests. Andyjsmith (talk) 20:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Gerard O'Neill cylinder
[edit]Hello. I just came across this article, which may be of interest to you: O'Neill cylinder. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Irrelevant suggestions
[edit]Why do you keep adding pointless suggestions to article talk pages? For example I’ve just noticed what you added to Talk:Space Exploration Initiative. This was a project that ended more than 25 years ago but you want to add material about a completely unrelated NASA think tank that began last year. How on Earth could this be relevant to the article? I can only assume that you didn’t even both to read the article first.
Please stop wasting everyone’s time in this way. I have the following suggestions:
- Search Wikipedia to see if the material is already covered
- Read the article first and ask yourself if your material has a place there
Andyjsmith (talk) 08:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
cost of global warming
[edit]Hi I am moving your comment here. You wrote
|
-=- Proposed Edit --
Sir |
- (A) The article you want is Global warming
- (B) Try drafting something readable in your WP:SANDBOX and try again
- NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
UAV material
[edit]I’ve moved the material that you added to the Miniature UAV talkpage back here because it’s not relevant to Ministure UAVs. There are other articles about UAVs where it might be relevant so please do your research and put the material where it ought to go rather than asking other editors to do the work for you. Thanks Andyjsmith (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Man-portable UAVs
The unmanned aerial vehicle or UAV refers to an aircraft without human pilots or passengers. The UAV is also sometimes called aerial drone. This drone can either be fully or partly autonomous. However, it is frequently controlled by a human pilot.
https://www.rand.org/topics/unmanned-aerial-vehicles.html
UAVs have emerged as among the popular gadgets to conduct outdoor discoveries as well as capture real-time aerial video footages.
https://www.techflier.com/2017/01/04/15-drones-for-exploring-new-landscapes-and-terrains/
Drone technologies are currently available to the public and more will become available to them in the future. UAVs can practically be seen in nearly all sectors of modern society. However, potentials are counterbalanced by risks and threats making UAVs targets of damage and destruction. Countries and governments have different perspectives about the use of these drones.
{{Custers, Bart=||The Future of Done Use: Opportunities and Threats from Ethical and Legal Perspectives=||Springer, 2016, pp. 3 – 7=}}
https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=WytEDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA135&dq=drone+for+exploration&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLk6KUvp7gAhVSiXAKHcxwCHgQ6AEIQjAE#v=onepage&q=drone%20for%20exploration&f=false
In the United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) officials will make a decision if an aerial drone will be with the NASA’s next rover to Mars scheduled for launching in 2020.
https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/03/15/nasa-to-decide-soon-whether-flying-drone-will-launch-with-mars-2020-rover/
I removed the paragraph that you added because exactly the same material was already in the article. I’ve had to do this on other articles you edited and so have other editors. Will you for goodness sake read the articles before you edit them? Andyjsmith (talk) 08:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Corporate accountability for human rights violations
[edit]You did it again. Your edit duplicated material that was already covered in the article. Please stop. Learn how to edit - and the first step is to read the article! Andyjsmith (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
You made a suggestion on the talk page of Freedom of information. If you’d made a simple search you’d have found that your suggested material is already included, almost word for word, in Freedom of information laws by country.
I’m sure you want to add material in a way that benefits Wikipedia but you really must do your homework. Pretty much everything you’ve ever added has been removed by other editors, usually because it’s irrelevant, repetitious or simply in the wrong place. This is time consuming and disruptive.
Please stop and think before you act.
Andyjsmith (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Reliable sources
[edit]Hello. I’ve been looking through some of your recent edits and I think that you need to brush up your knowledge of the guidelines on WP:RS, particularly the sections on scholarship and self-published articles. For example I removed on citation you recently added which links to a student paper because this fails the standards laid out for scholarly works. Andyjsmith (talk) 08:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Building on this, please be more careful. You've restored references to PediaPress, which is simply a collection of reprinted Wikipedia articles. If you're confused by this, let me know and I can walk you through the problem. Please do not restore those links. Kuru (talk) 15:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Public interest accounting, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you are going to copy edit an article please do it properly. Your edit introduced a grammatical error (people are “who” not “which”) and removed an opening bracket. Andyjsmith (talk) 07:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- I wonder if English is not your first language because some of your copy edits, which I have reversed, have very odd grammar. For example in Mangpor Chonthicha you used the phrase “born from”. That’s not a thing. In British English children are “born into” a family not “born from” it. This is basic stuff and if you don’t know it you really should not be correcting other people’s work.
- And in some cases your edits have actually altered meanings - for example Rainer Mausfeld said his publications since 2015 were controversial and you changed it to say that his publications were controversial since 2015. Utterly different meaning. The original was clumsy but your version was simply wrong. If you can’t see this please refrain from making this kind of edit.
- I have to say that I find your edits poor to the point of being disruptive. They’re not vandalism as such but very close. If the quality of your edits doesn’t improve I’ll have to raise the issue with Wikipedia administrators.
Andyjsmith (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- And another one: in Educational management you changed a sentence that was about what education is to one which is about what education does. Not the same thing. English is a subtle language and you must not treat it like this! Andyjsmith (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Neil Armstrong, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A total and unmitigated defeat, you may be blocked from editing. “In October 5, 1938” is not English. Please stop vandalising articles by messing around with sentence structure. Andyjsmith (talk) 07:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 23)
[edit]
|
Hello, LOBOSKYJOJO!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
|
May 2019
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gesher (political party). This really is your final warning. You deliberately introduced grammatical errors in Gesher (political party) and Gran Turismo 5 Prologue. I’m tired of cleaning up your errors. Next time you do this I will ask for your Wikipedia account to be blocked. Andyjsmith (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valentin Fortunov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Zoe Quinn
[edit]Zoe uses gender-neutral pronouns. Ergo, we use them in the articles when referring to them. This is not open for debate or alternative interpretation, I'm afraid. --Jorm (talk) 05:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Minor barnstar |
| You are good at copy-editing, like the ones on Lohari Jatu. ωικιωαrrιorᑫᑫ1ᑫ 12:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC) |
New message from WikiWarrior9919
[edit]
Message added 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ωικιωαrrιorᑫᑫ1ᑫ 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, LOBOSKYJOJO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:LOBOSKYJOJO/sandbox.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |