Talk:Regenerative design
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was an other article with a similar name, Regenerative (design), which was almost word by word the same as this article. I've compared the articles and merged the diffs into this article, and made a redirect from the former article as well. Mårten Berglund (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 03:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Regenerative Design → Regenerative design –
Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. The article was littered with wrong capitalisations. Lower-case will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 05:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Tony and WP:CAPS. Jenks24 (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support per above. Dohn joe (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.