Jump to content

Talk:Mega journal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Logic

[edit]

The "definition" section lists as first defining characteristic of a "mega journal": broad coverage of different subject areas. The examples, however, include AIP Advances (physics only), G3 (genetics only -genomics is just a subfield of genetics), and Zootaxa (taxonomy only). That sounds rather contradictory. --Randykitty (talk) 12:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've always understood megajournal to be partly defined by breadth, e.g. PLOS One or Sage Open. Perhaps we need to be more careful in which journals are included here, because I guess it's better to go with how megajournals are generally defined rather than whether journals self-identify as one. - Lawsonstu (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Peer reviewed" or "peer viewed"?

[edit]

For a critical note on the quality of peer review in mega journals, see Mega-Journals and Peer Review: Can Quality and Standards Survive?. --Randykitty (talk) 07:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedia article cited in PeerJ article

[edit]

Björk B. (2015) Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? PeerJ 3:e981 https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981

This Wikipedia article cited in The Scholarly Kitchen blog

[edit]

[1]. fgnievinski (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cell Reports

[edit]

Cell Reports is not a megajournal, so I have removed it from the list. The founding Editor explicitly says so on the journal's website here:

"Cell Reports is an open access journal that publishes high quality papers. Unlike Scientific Reports we are not a PLoS One clone."

PointOfPresence (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mega journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mega journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mega journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent literature

[edit]

(For anyone interested in digesting and summarizing them in the Wikipedia article.) fgnievinski (talk) 07:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mega_journal&oldid=1206014070"