View source for User talk:Ohnoitsjamie

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
<!----------- Leave new comments at BOTTOM of page --------------------->
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
{{User:Ohnoitsjamie/Talktemp}} 

{{tmbox|text='''NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE BOTTOM. NOT THE TOP.'''<Br /><Br /><Br />Please add new messages to the '''bottom of the page'''.  If a conversation is started here, I'll respond here; if it starts on your talk page, I'll respond there.}}

====Contacting me====
I prefer to communicate via '''talk pages.''' Please only email me if there is a good reason not to conduct a conversation on a talk page. I '''''do not respond to emails''''' regarding link deletions and other issues that should be discussed on your userpage or the article talk page. 

====Why did you remove my external links?====
'''''If you've come here because you want to know why I removed some external links you've added''''', please read [[WP:SPAM|Wikipedia's policies on spam]], [[WP:EL|Wikipedia external link guidelines]] and [[WP:COI|conflict-of-interest]] first. Because of Wikipedia's popularity, it has become a target for folks looking to promote their sites, which is against Wikipedia policies.  If you read [[WP:SPAM]] and still feel that your link(s) does not violate those policies, let me know. 

One common argument I hear is ''But so-and-so link is on that article, and it's commercial!''  [[WP:EL]] doesn't explicitly forbid In links to commercial sites; it depends on the notability of the link, its content, and if it's a reference or a notable pro/con argument on a controversial subject, etc.  On the other hand, I think that many Wikipedians would agree that there are way too many commercial links at present time, so feel free to "prune away" if the link doesn't meet guidelines in [[WP:EL]]. Incidentally, if you've come here to complain that I've deleted links to your blog (especially a blog with advertising), don't bother. You'll have to find free advertising somewhere else. A good Google search will reveal plenty of places for that sort of thing.

Vandalism and insults left here will be recycled in the bit bucket. Remember: [[Wikipedia:Civility|be nice!]]

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
<!----------- Leave new comments at BOTTOM of page --------------------->
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->

====Talk archives====
*[[/archive1|2005 archives]]
*[[/archive2|Jan 2006 - Mar 2006 archives]]
*[[/archive3|Apr 2006 - June 2006 archives]]d
*[[/archive4|July 2006 - August 2006 archives]]
*[[/archive5|August 2006 - November 2006 archives]]
*[[/archive6|December 2006 - January 2007]]
*[[/archive7|February 2007 - March 2007]]
*[[/archive8|April 2007 - July 2007]]
*[[/archive9|August 2007 - October 2007]]
*[[/archive10|November 2007 - January 2008]]
*[[/archive11|February 2008 - April 2008]]
*[[/archive12|May 2008 - August 2008]]
*[[/archive13|September 2008 - October 2008]]
*[[/archive14|November 2008 - January 2009]]
*[[/archive15|February 2009 - April 2009]]
*[[/archive16|May 2009 - August 2009]]
*[[/archive17|September 2009 - October 2009]]
*[[/archive18|November 2009 - April 2010]]
*[[/archive19|May 2010 - July 2010]]
*[[/archive20|August 2010 - September 2010]]
*[[/archive21|September 2010 - January 2011]]
*[[/archive22|February 2011 - April 2011]]
*[[/archive23|April 2011 - May 2011]]
*[[/archive24|June 2011 - December 2011]]
*[[/archive25|Jan 2012 - May 2012]]
<!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
<!-- LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF PAGE. IF YOU DO NOT DO THIS, YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED. -->
<!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->


'''PLEASE LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT THE *BOTTOM* OF THIS PAGE.'''
<!-- =========================================================== -->

==Variety References==
re: your comments on my recent entries - I have no connection or affiliation with the blog whatsoever. I don't know the person who runs it, I have no commercial agenda. (The blog is not even used to advertise anything.) I use it because it collates data from Variety, the film industry trade paper, a highly regarded source. This blog reproduces information from there (and other sources) to provide an invaluable information database that is incredibly useful for wikipedia readers. I could just put the reference to Variety and not have the blog link but it would mean users miss out on seeing where the information came from and being able to put it in context e.g. I give box office rentals for the films - logging on to the blog will mean people will also be able to see where those films ranked in box office rentals for that year. I believe the link is entirely appropriate until another website that contains all this information is created.[[User:Dutchy85|Dutchy85]] ([[User talk:Dutchy85|talk]]) 23:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
: I didn't think it was your blog or anything; I just don't think that a blog that simply replicates data from another site is an appropriate reference. That said, I posted it to the Wikiproject Spam board to solicit further opinions (and on that posting I did specifically say that I thought you were adding the links in good faith). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
It would be best to use the original Variety link but its not available on the internet - the transmission of the data is accurate.  So many wikipedia film articles are unreferenced - I'm trying to provide pages with some sort of reference for these pages. I've never done an entry which simple lists a link - I always include some other basic film information e.g. it's IMDB listing. I have checked a lot of the information in my own collection of Variety box office listings (photographed from papers at the library) and it is accurate. (If you can point to an error please let me know and I will remove it). I appreciate you're trying to decrease the amount of spam out there but ask that an exception be given in this occasion.[[User:Dutchy85|Dutchy85]] ([[User talk:Dutchy85|talk]]) 15:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
: Sorry, but I agree with Hu12 (a veteran editor very well-versed in EL policy). You shouldn't have kept adding the links after I notified you that they probably were not acceptable. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
::Dutchy, I agree that a lot of film articles are very under-referenced and appreciate your willingness to try to find an online link to information but you don't really need a link to an online source, you really only need a reference to a published reliable source even if there's no online link available.  If you have information directly from Variety with those library photographs, then you include the Author/Volume/Issue/Page from Variety to back up your cited source.  If the information is available in a reliably-sourced book like Solomon's 20th Century or Steinberg's Reel Facts that does not have an online version, then it's pretty much the same, just fill out the appropriate Cite template and leave the URL information blank. [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 17:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

== Please Don't delete my page this time ==

Dear ohnoitsjamie,

I am recreating the page JT12_O2, please don't delete it this time, this page was being created for good reasons and was going to be there for people to see my good work i was not praising myself or trying to show myself off in a good way so please let me have the page

Thanks in advance

JT12_O2  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JT12 O2|JT12 O2]] ([[User talk:JT12 O2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JT12 O2|contribs]]) 16:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Wikipedia is not free web-hosting.  The page does not meet any of our guidelines for inclusion; if you continue to recreate it, you will be blocked from editing. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:53, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

== Mohammed ==

I assume you're holding off on him because you're slightly [[WP:INVOLVED]]? Very nice of you but if it were up to me he'd be blocked a long time ago.

Anyhoo, just dropping you a note to let you know I've taken him to ANI. 

Cheers,

<span style="background-color:#C0C0C0">[[User:Egg Centric|<font color="#222222">Egg</font>]] [[User_talk:Egg Centric|<font color="#7D7D7D">Centri</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Egg Centric|<font color="#FFFFFF">c</font>]]</span> 17:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

== Sorry For Messing with your page !! ==

Im so sorry for messing mith your page i shouldn't have and i am really sorry i dodn't mean any harm to you  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JT12 O2|JT12 O2]] ([[User talk:JT12 O2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JT12 O2|contribs]]) 09:24, 2 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Oopsies! ==

"Shankweiler's Auto Park: Orefield, Pennsylvania"....first result on the Google search. Argh, sorry for reverting your edits! No harm, no foul, eh? :D <big>'''[[User:Theopolisme|<font color=#00B74A>Theopolisme]] '''</font></big><sub><small>[[User_Talk:Theopolisme|<font color=#37DB79> TALK]]</sup></sup></small> 03:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
: If only I had a quarter for every goof I made here...no worries, and cheers! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 03:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

== Carlin Romano edits by cinacina123 ==

I'm not sure I'm doing this properly. Would you take a look at the recent edits to the Carlin Romano page? They seem to be made by someone promoting publicity. There are many deletions of sources that refer to controversies that define the importance of the subject and inclusion of only positive p.r. And they are done by someone with a single purpose and only on this page. Thank you.
[[User:Philebritite|Philebritite]] ([[User talk:Philebritite|talk]]) 02:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
(2) Thank you for your contribution; indeed you did come up with a compromise. I followed your lead and integrated all relevant material externally sourced as in-line citations. Cinacina123, however, is now using another sockpuppet (Ecoscrimps) to revert all substantive changes and remove all non-p.r. material. Again, it is single-purpose, single-subject, continuous with the previous actions of Cinacina123. This is one strongly determined person behind these edits. I don't know how to produce balanced coverage of the subject and his controversies under these conditions. Could you take another look, please? [[User:Philebritite|Philebritite]] ([[User talk:Philebritite|talk]]) 21:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
:: Didn't have much time to edit yesterday (nor will I today or tomorrow); there is always the [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard]] if you'd like more uninvolved parties looking at it. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
:: I don't know if you're interested, but Ecoshrimp, who I suspect is behind the sockpuppets/meatpuppets I suspect, send me a message which I think I'm supposed to interpret as a threat of legal action, similar to what Aennie and Encycedit did and were warned about. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Philebritite&redirect=no  In any case, the flurry of edits seems to have subsided somewhat.[[User:Philebritite|Philebritite]] ([[User talk:Philebritite|talk]]) 19:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

== Carlin Romano edits by Philebritite ==
Hi, thank you so much for your attention in the entry "Carlin Romano". Could you take another look at that entry. This nametag "Philebritite" keep deleting the information which is verified and with reference. What he defined as puffery is not necessarily defined by else. He holds hatred toward  Carlin Romano and keep adding what he think is negative information to Mr. Romano. That is Okay if it is supported by solid evidence, and I can understand. What I cannot understand is why he uses double-standard to say that other nametags' editing (with reference) is "wordy puffery".

(cur | prev) 18:11, 13 June 2012‎ Philebritite(talk | contribs)‎ . . (10,578 bytes) (-1,440)‎ . . (shorten wordy puffery, add in critical references that have been repeatedly deleted by Cinacina123 sockpuppets) updated since my last visit (undo)

== Philebritite's long-time destructive activities ==

Philebritite keep deleting facts with reference in the Carlin Romano entry (cur | prev) 16:55, 21 June 2012‎ Philebritite(talk | contribs)‎ m (12,120 bytes) (-17)‎ (→‎Career: correct the details of a reference so it does not go beyond the stated facts) (undo)). 

Could you please take a look at history of all his destructive behavior in the Carlin Romano entry since 2009? All that he did only makes the entry unbalanced. It is not fair that you let him keep his crazy editing moves. His intention of putting what he think negative information to make the subject look bad is so obvious, he only add negative information and delete all positive information even with fact. 

It is weird that Philebritite put minor controversies such as Philip Roth as the major content of this entry, and you encourage him to do so, which making the subject always rouse controversies, which is not true. You can enter"carlin romano " in the search bar, and you will see a lot of sentences mentioning "Carlin Romano", which cited Mr. Romano's reviewing opinion as the content of an entry. For example, entries of Jeffrey Eugenides,Binnie Kirshenbaum refer to Carlin Romano's opinion.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ecoshrimps|Ecoshrimps]] ([[User talk:Ecoshrimps|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ecoshrimps|contribs]]) 03:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Philebritite has a better understanding of Wikipedia policy than you do. I'm not even sure what point you are trying to make in this post. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Just feel sad about your judgement. So obvious that Philebritite is coming again and again to destroy the entry and to defame Mr. Romano. Some of his previous post in 2009, 2010 even violate Mr. Romano's privacy. I believe Wiki policy does not encourage libel as Philebritite did.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ecoshrimps|Ecoshrimps]] ([[User talk:Ecoshrimps|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ecoshrimps|contribs]]) 13:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: We do have a [[WP:BLP]] policy that is taken very seriously; that said, I have yet to see anything that Philebritite has added that violates that policy.  (Unlike yourself (and the numerous other single-purpose accounts editing the article), Philebritite edits a variety of articles).  If you want additional opinions regarding BLP, feel free to post on the [[Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard|BLP noticeboard]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

If you check all of Philebritite's history,you'll see 90% of his editing is in Carlin Romano's entry, especially when he first created his account to post false information in Mr. Romano's entry (Luckily, other editors save this entry with great effort, which you can see in the talk page of Carlin Romano's page). Philebritite just edited other articles to shape the impression that he is a objective editor(now he get what he wanted when you agree that he edits a variety of articles, which lead you to your conclusion that this so-call variety will make his editing in Carlin Romano's entry more neutral--strange logic), but his main purpose is still in Mr. Romano's entry. If you do based your judgement on the number of article the two of us is editing, I have nothing to say. Feel sorry and very sad about your judgement. Maybe I should not and will not seek help from you any more.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ecoshrimps|Ecoshrimps]] ([[User talk:Ecoshrimps|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ecoshrimps|contribs]]) 00:43, 23 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Supreme Dicks page edits by Threegeny ==

Hi there, I'm asking you nicely to please not revert the [[Supreme Dicks]] page to any versions done by Threegeny as their edits to that page are vandalism. I'm also putting a warning on their page. Thanks! [[User:Mechaferret|Mechaferret]] ([[User talk:Mechaferret|talk]]) 03:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
: Did not notice that vandalism. I appended a "last warning" to Threegeny's page, as so far it's a vandalism-only account. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


== Ink Cartridge ==

Ink Cartridge
Hi there.  I am an expert in the ink cartridge field and while I know there was the potential for COI, I updated information on the page which accurately reflects the topic in a neutral fashion that is not promotional and contained no spam.  Why did you delete it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/174.112.26.83  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/174.112.26.83|174.112.26.83]] ([[User talk:174.112.26.83|talk]]) 06:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Wikipedia is not an advertising forum, period. I'm tired of SPA island ink cartridge spammers, and will start blocking them on sight. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Good Work on fighting Vandalism we need more people like you in this world [[User:JT12wiki|JT12wiki]] ([[User talk:JT12wiki|talk]]) 21:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
|}
: Thanks much! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

== [[Richmond Fire Department]] ==

Hi, you may want to take another look at '''[[Richmond Fire Department]]''' as I have began rescuing it and now it has independent sources including some unambiguous in depth coverage of one of the many environmental catastrophes that occur in Richmond and that this department in particular is notorious for dealing with. I have found more sources and will be adding them, thanks for giving it a second look and if you have any input or could help expand, copyedit, or trim the article in any way please be my guest. Thank you. -Troy.[[User:Luciferwildcat|LuciferWildCat]] ([[User talk:Luciferwildcat|talk]]) 02:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

==Morse High School Alumni List==
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Talk:Morse High School (San Diego, California)#IAR Petition]]. {{#if:|{{{more}}}}} [[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 18:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC){{z48}}

==Notice of Dispute resolution discussion==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "[[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Arthur C. Clarke|Arthur C. Clarke]]". Thank you.<!--Template:DRN-notice--> Note I'm just informing you. --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk to me</font>]]''</font></sup> 16:28, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

== Would you might stopping by... ==
...[[Talk:List of people claimed to be Jesus]]?  Someone (who, if I wasn't going to [[WP:AGF]], I would assume is a troll) wants us to get consensus ''again'' before I leave a note asking people not to engage in that bit of smartassery that always gets reverted. [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 03:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


== Not spam... ==
...coney blog is used to get information for the site, it is not commercial and only informational, I have edited the wikipedia entry mysefl  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Msmokevi|Msmokevi]] ([[User talk:Msmokevi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Msmokevi|contribs]]) 02:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: See the blurb at the top of this page. Continue to spam your site and you will be blocked. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 03:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

==July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages==

Dear Author/Ohnoitsjamie

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Barrett's Osophagus.
I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance.
[[User:Hydra Rain|Hydra Rain]] ([[User talk:Hydra Rain|talk]]) 17:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

== Good Tools are Not Spam ==

We referenced a link to a free speed and quality tester in the section that mentioned Quality of Service (QoS). It seems far from SPAM and a very useful tool to readers. We respectfully request that you put the reference to the speed tester back. People that use VoIP have a real need to check network speed and QOS.[[User:Rogerbabbott|Rogerbabbott]] ([[User talk:Rogerbabbott|talk]]) 06:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
: Read the blurb at the top of the page.  Your contributions thus are are leading you down the path of getting blocked as a spam-only account. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:24, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

== [[Bulk SMS]] Page ==

I'm sorry that you feel my posting is advertising - what I fail to understand though is why the other links are considered acceptable? They are all links to similar providers as [[Textlocal]], and indeed in most cases are competitors?! And indeed, Textlocal would be considered a much more reliable and bigger provider to say Txtnation! Nunners 13:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nunners|Nunners]] ([[User talk:Nunners|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nunners|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Please see [[WP:COI]], [[WP:Reliable sources]], and [[WP:ADVERT]]. I'm not discussing it further. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:26, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

==I need a need a little help==
Hi Ohnoisjamie, I don't want to be bothering you about this, but since you reverted the same commercial links I reverted in [[Henson trust]], I was hoping you could help with something. Can you take a look at [[Registered Disability Savings Plan]] because to me, the article seems like it's nothing but spam and would like a second opinion before editing as to avoid offending the editor who made all the recent additions. The same editor keeps adding this stuff to several articles, and left me a message earlier today on my [[User talk:Cmr08#Re: Henson Trust|talk page]] trying to argue that the links should be allowed becasue there helpul to people who have children with disabilities. I did my best to try to explain the policy about external links to her, but maybe if a far more experienced edior took a look and edited out the spam, she might understand why her links keeps getting reverted. Like I said above, I don't want to bother you because I know you're busy with other stuff, so if it wasn't appropriate for me to ask this of you, I appologize. [[User:Cmr08|Cmr08]] ([[User talk:Cmr08|talk]]) 05:55, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

== 23andMe ==

Hi,

I don't know if I'd consider [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=23andMe&diff=prev&oldid=502975065 this] source as spam.  I struggled a bit with whether it should be included, but it does [[WP:V|verify]] some text that is now without a source.  [[Moment (magazine)|''Moment'']] does seem to be a legitimate source, and the information, though slightly self-serving, does seem valid (noting for instance that 23andMe isn't solely doing free Parkinson's screenings out of pure selflessness but rather because of a family connection between one of the co-founders and the disease).  Is there something I'm missing?  Because right now I'm leaning towards replacing the citation.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 15:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
: Actually, I deleted it based on the editor, an SPA spamming two magazines (I had a similar issue recently with a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Editormomentmag different SPA] spamming the same magazine).  Had an editor without an obvious COI added it, I would not have objected. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::I've reviewed and integrated it (and I totally see why you would be concerned over it being spam) and I would say it looks OK.  Do you have any issue with me replacing it?  Even spam accounts can make good edits on occassion, though often by accident rather than design :)  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 16:17, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::: No, I don't have any issues with you integrating it.  My intent is to make it clear to SPAs that canvassing isn't permitted.  I don't have an issue with the ref per se. Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=23andMe&diff=prev&oldid=502981867 Done], thanks.  Jimbo should work on a way to get wikipedia to automatically reach out of the screen and punch spammers in the face.  [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 16:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::::: *mashes "punch" button furiously*  <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:58, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

== Georgia State University Edits ==

James,

First of all, thank you for service to the world in editing Wikipedia. It takes a village... Your efforts no doubt contribute to the growth of Wikipedia.

I would like to question you on your reversal of my edits. Several of the persons that you removed can all be quickly googled and found to be either notable in academia or business. I did not do an exhaustive search on all of them, but after verifying two of them I could find no reasoning in your edit and reversed them all.

Case in point, on what reasoning and logic could you possibly remove E. Vachel Pennebaker from the list of notable alumni. A graduate in 1970, a former president of Sears & Roebuck as well as a Georgia State University Board member.


While I am not going to go through the entire list, I will challenge any edit you make at this point, on this page.

Please take a moment to look at the salient facts, consider the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|standards]] that we all strive to adhere to on Wikipedia when you decide to edit the page again. Make special note that many of the people you have removed meet and exceed the criteria we go by as they are academics. 

I sincerely hope that your next edit is done after careful consideration of each of the individuals.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fomeister|Fomeister]] ([[User talk:Fomeister|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fomeister|contribs]]) 18:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== User:BalkanInsight ==

They have appealed against their block. I am going to change it as it is not a candidate for a hardblock, it is a standard COI/company name one which should have been given softer block. [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] ([[User talk:Secretlondon|talk]]) 21:19, 23 July 2012
: OK. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 12:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

== User:Kativw ==
Hi Jamie, I received a message that my external links didn't comply with the guidelines and were taken down, so I read the Wikispam policy and am contacting you per your page's instructions.  I believe the links were removed in error and would like to know what other information you need to reconsider them.  Thanks, [[User:Kativw|Kativw]] ([[User talk:Kativw|talk]]) 23:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Kativw  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kativw|Kativw]] ([[User talk:Kativw|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kativw|contribs]]) 23:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: There's nothing to reconsider. We don't allow [[WP:SPA|single purpose account]] link canvassing. If you continue to add them, you will be blocked, period. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 12:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

== User:Scutigera ==
You just autoblocked my IP address. No hard feelings (you referred to someone else's account, and there are ten thousand people using this IP address), but I was in the middle of an edit to Wikipedia: Activist; I wanted to change "It is definitely better for a conflict to be disclosed, than disguised and pursued on the sly" to "It is definitely better for a conflict to be disclosed than to be disguised and pursued on the sly". I had just changed the sentence from its previous form, "It is definitely better for a conflict to be disclosed than disguised, and pursued on the sly", and I'm feeling frustrated at leaving my work half-done (and at not having thought of the better structure before saving). If you agree and you have time, go ahead and make the change yourself. Otherwise I'll try to remember to do it when I get home.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Scutigera|Scutigera]] ([[User talk:Scutigera|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scutigera|contribs]]) 21:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: [[Activist]] redirects to [[Activism]]; I don't see that quote anywhere in that article. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
:: Not "Activist", but "Wikipedia: Activist". Anyway, it's almost quitting time, so I'll get it myself when I get home. Thanks for your prompt attention. [[User:Scutigera|Scutigera]] ([[User talk:Scutigera|talk]]) 01:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
::: OK. Sorry for the collateral damage, that quote makes a lot more sense in Wikispace now that I think about it. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

==Unsoursed edits to [[Indus Valley Civilisation]]==
You have warned one user [Santoshlee1]] not to post unsoursed material and later his accounts were temporarily blocked. Now the same user has added lot of unsoursed material and wrong information to [[Indus Valley Civilisation]] on 31st July 2012 (today). Can you look into it?[[User:Rayabhari|Rayabhari]] ([[User talk:Rayabhari|talk]]) 16:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

== Some bubble tea for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Bubble_Tea.png|65px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For reverting vandalism to  [[Indus Valley Civilisation]] and for immediate response. Thank you. [[User:Rayabhari|Rayabhari]] ([[User talk:Rayabhari|talk]]) 16:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
|}
: Thanks! The user in question seems to have good intentions, but seems to be primarily trying to advance a particular point of view across articles. I added a few more to my watchlist. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

== Edits to Skrillex ==
Your removal of my edits to the skrillex page leaves me with questions.  Have you listened to Skrillex?  Do you know what dubstep actually is?  Did I not have enough Sources?  I dislike it when people try to push music into genres were they don't belong, and i need to fix the mislabeling of skrillex as dubstep by the ignorant population.  The quote i supplied is real, does wiki require a more legitimate source despite the quote being exactly the same?  Also, the fact that he helped a metalcore band with some programming and vocals does not warrant him a label of metalcore.  When it comes to placing music into a genre there are few references that are helpful and most are hurtful.  Most Legitimate publications don't care if they correctly label music with a genre, which results in most columnists labeling bands with genres that aren't accurate.  Outside of columnists and "professionals" any other reference on the internet is going to be labeled as "an opinion" and deemed unusable in wikipedia, am i correct?  I know that trying to label music with a genre is a fool's job, but i can no longer stand by and have skrillex be called dubstep, or breaking benjamin be called alternative metal, or many other bands be mislabeld by the ignorant public.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Crimsonokami|Crimsonokami]] ([[User talk:Crimsonokami|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Crimsonokami|contribs]]) 22:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: As stated in my edit summary, you need a [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable source]] to change a band/musician genre.  I don't have person opinions regarding Skrillex, but his genre is widely described as dubstep in numerous reliable sources. [http://newsroom.mtv.com/2012/07/25/muse-reveals-skrillex-as-major-influence-on-new-album-the-2nd-law/ this one, for example]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Well then I guess "the majority is always correct".  Newspapers and publications can be wrong, as they are made of people, and these people don't care for a distinction between dubstep and electronic house.  As once the meaning of awful was "filled with awe", it is now "Extremely bad or unpleasant"; and soon dubstep will no longer mean what it once meant, and will change into what people miss-use it for now.  I do not hold any grudge against you or wikipedia for demanding "reliable sources" and exclusion of "opinion"; Instead I hold a grudge against the ingorant masses who continue to miss-use words. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Crimsonokami|Crimsonokami]] ([[User talk:Crimsonokami|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Crimsonokami|contribs]]) 23:23, 31 July 2012‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
: Honestly, as much as I love music, I think waaaay too much energy is spent here debating and edit-warring on genres. In most cases I don't get involved, but had I not reverted your edits to Skrillex someone else surely would've given that he's so strongly associated with dubstep (or brostep) in the press.  I'm a big Beck fan, and a good friend of mine considers Beck to be "pop," which by some definitions I'd agree with; that doesn't diminish my appreciation for Beck. I don't care what people call his music. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

::{{tps}} See also [[User:Realist2/Genre Warrior|this discussion about genre warring on Wikipedia]]. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
::: Thanks, that is an excellent summation of massive source of wasted energy on Wikipedia.  <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

== Roger L Kemp ==

I'm bordering on being a rogue admin with the block of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/75.2.208.183 this ip]. Would love to have your verification on it. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
: Returning shortly after a block doing the same (obnoxious) thing? I'm 100% on-board with the second block.  I'd go three months if it happened again. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
::Thanks. I even put a personal note on there, but that means it easily falls under [[User:Valfontis/Valfontis' Law|Valfontis' Law]]. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 17:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

== [[InvestedIn]] ==

Hi there. It seems you forgot to substitute the prod template over there, so I've fixed that. Please remember also to notify the article's author. That said, the page doesn't very notable to me either but they've provided some references so let's see what others think of it. [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 23:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
: Oops, thanks for catching that. Funny thing is I almost always subst everything else, don't know why I often miss that with the prod template. Thanks again, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

== Rule of Three (writing) and copywriting pages ==

Hi. I understand the sensitivity towards spam and I do believe that you are right to police spam links and have done an enviable task to date.

However, I think the external link for the Rule of Three (writing) page was valid. 

The reason: it formed the basis for the information added to the section regarding the rule of three techniques used in copywriting, marketing and advertising.

As this external article forms the basis of the information added (and does not promote any services within the article) I think it unfair to label this link as spam. With that in mind, I would like to reinstate the article as an external source. 

Secondly, I think the same argument can be applied to the text added to the Copywriting page, which was:

"As well as possessing a command of language, copywriters must master and apply a broad range of persuasive techniques, such as sales psychology, marketing methods such as [[AIDA_(marketing)|AIDA and CAB]] and other linguistic devices such as the [[Rule_of_three_(writing)|Rule of Three]].<ref>* [http://rule-of-three.co.uk/what-is-the-rule-of-three-copywriting/ The Rule of Three used for effective communication within copywriting, marketing and advertising]</ref>"

I'm not sure why you have deleted this minor addition. I think it is a short and valid point, which touches upon techniques widely used by copywriters, while cross referencing both its sources (internal wikipedia links to the relevant sections on AIDA and Rule of Three (writing)).

I also added the external link to the Rule of Three article as I felt that it was a non-promotional article that covers the technique in more detail. 

Please note, there are also links to blogs and articles in the copywriting section which, as with the link that you have deleted, come from organisations that sell copywriting services but are not actually doing so within the link posted.

Copywriting is a commercial pursuit. It is to be expected that copywriting organisations will produce informative articles on the subject, without promoting themselves directly.  

I added the external link to the Rule of Three article as I felt that it was a non-promotional article that covers the technique in more detail. Please note, there are also links to blogs and articles in the copywriting section which, as with the link which you have deleted, come from organisations that sell copywriting services but are not actually doing so within the link posted. 

I would like to reinstate the links. However, I don't wish to be inflammatory, so would only like to do so with approval and discussion.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Scampicat|Scampicat]] ([[User talk:Scampicat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scampicat|contribs]]) 16:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No, per [[WP:COI]] and [[WP:EL]]. If you see other links that violate those policies, feel free to delete them as well. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


Hi, I read both of these policy documents before I took the trouble to create the wikipedia content. 

I honestly don't see how the content or links can be classed as a conflict of interest ( I don't work for the organisation who published the external link which I used as the basis for the content). 

Also I'm not sure how the link violates the External link policy.

Please could you illustrate:

1. How the link violates these policies.
2. How the external link contains self-promotional material.
3. How this external link differs from the the two existing external links on the Copywriting page.

I think it slightly unfair to keep the section on  'copywriting, marketing and advertising' on the Rule of Three (writing) page but not link to the article from which it came.

Thanks for your time.   [[User:Scampicat|Scampicat]] ([[User talk:Scampicat|talk]]) 17:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Scampicat|Scampicat]] ([[User talk:Scampicat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scampicat|contribs]]) 17:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:COI]] exist for a reason; so editors don't have to keep explaining this over and over. As such, I'm not discussing it further. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I have opened a discussion on the dispute resolution board: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard
[[User:Scampicat|Scampicat]] ([[User talk:Scampicat|talk]]) 20:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
: You'll quickly find out that it was a waste of time. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

== [[Caiden Cowger|Caiden Cowger]] ==

Reference your comment on my talk page, I have reviewed earlier versions of this article and have declined restoration on the basis that earlier versions still fail under speedy A7. Requesting editor has been notified. --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 10:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
: Sounds good...I was leaning that way myself. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

== Lexus changes ==

Hello Ohnotitsjaime,

I would like to say I know Lexus since I'm an enthusiast of the marque. The reason why I removed Toyota as a manufacturer it's simple because it's not "Toyota" the one who is manufacturing. It's true that Lexus cars are built in Toyota manufacturing plants, but they are assembled in different assembling lines, they have their own quality standards and more importantly, the workforce and employees are different. So knowing that I can't say that these vehicles are manufactured by Toyota since not even the workers are from Toyota, they are from Lexus.

And Lexus don't have any more Toyota counterpart (rebadging) vehicle starting from 2005, where the marque was introduced in its own country Japan. The only vehicles which still have something related to Toyota in terms of platform sharing are the LX and GX which aren't even sold globally.

I hope this clarifies why I removed Toyota as manufacturer.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Asoksevil|Asoksevil]] ([[User talk:Asoksevil|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Asoksevil|contribs]]) 15:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Update: I just realized that you also removed what I wrote about the meanings of the Lexus nomenclature for their models. Why?  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Asoksevil|Asoksevil]] ([[User talk:Asoksevil|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Asoksevil|contribs]]) 15:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: A Lexus is still ultimately made by Toyota Motor Corporation, just as the [[Lincoln MKS]] is made by Ford.  I'm a Lexus owner myself, but I'm not going to pretend that it's not a rebadged Toyota Aristo. You are welcome to bring up your points on the talk page for Lexus, but it's not appropriate to make changes like that without a consensus.<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello Ohnoitsjaime,

If your Lexus vehicle was made prior to 2005 (which is your case since you are talking about a Toyota Aristo either the 1st gen or 2nd gen) then your car is still a Lexus but rebadged as Toyota for some domestic and overseas markets. I understand your point and I will not struggle anymore regarding who is the manufacturer.

I pointed out earlier than other minos updates I added (nomenclature meaning and so as fixing F Sport instead of F-Sport since it's the correct way of spelling) were also removed with no reason. May I add them again?

Thank you for your attention  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Asoksevil|Asoksevil]] ([[User talk:Asoksevil|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Asoksevil|contribs]]) 02:47, 10 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Regarding your F-Sport related fixes; yes, those reverts were a mistake on my part. I thought I had corrected them, but I guess I missed a few. Thanks, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
== Pawlenty ==

Yeah, I was too in the moment moving the talk comment and fixing the vandalism that had been sitting on the article page for too long to think it through.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATim_Pawlenty&diff=506574081&oldid=506518001 Good call.]  Nice to meet you - have seen you all over the place for years, but don't think we've interacted. Cheers. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]]</strong>/<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 18:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
: Sigh...I love Colbert's show but wish he would quit sending idiot squads to bother us. Seen you around too; nice to meet you! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
=== Rhosymynydd ====
What are we doing wrong to violate anything by adding our non commercial website to the ostomy pages on wilipedia. We are Non commercial. We accept or contain no advertising - we promote no product or service - we list everyone in the ostomy world for free - we are basiclaly the wikipedia answer to the ostomy world - all we do is send free ostomy puppets to the millions of children in countries all over the world to help them to adjust to life with a bag. Do you wear an ostomy Bag? If not you cannot imagine how difficult it is for children to live life with a bag containine facel or urinary output or both is like. 
How are we violating content on wilikpaedia. We ahve written books on the subject yes, and they sell but all the royalties are ploughed back into the puppets for kids - When we sed the puoppets out, they go with no commercial advertising materials or commercial information, just the puppet plus its stoma and bag, all of which we make at our expense. Tell me how we are infringing anything?
: See the blurb at the top of the page regarding links. Also read [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

== Comic sans. ==

Good call on removing that section on comic sans. I removed the curse word monologue, actually I wanted to remove the whole thing, as you did,but I was worried a bunch of anti comic sans fans would have a fit. I think it was not notable as well.--[[Special:Contributions/98.87.89.184|98.87.89.184]] ([[User talk:98.87.89.184|talk]]) 20:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
: Glad you agree; I don't think a single Huffpost mention is enough to establish notability for inclusion. I'm not a big fan of extensive pop culture sections anyway; they are often too crufty. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

-New Message-

[[User:Gaurangpotdar|Gaurangpotdar]] ([[User talk:Gaurangpotdar|talk]]) 15:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Thank you for you suggestion, i would do as you have instructed me. I use the Internet very rarely so I am in a lack of Puntuation. 
Please give me your e-mail ID i would connect you when i will get time for the Internet

From- Gaurang Potdar
: Sorry, but I don't communicate via email for Wikipedia-related matters. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

== A kitten for you! ==

[[File:Red Kitten 01.jpg|left|150px]]
hi this for you vewy cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[[User:Zack239|Zack239]] ([[User talk:Zack239|talk]]) 08:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both"/>

== Criticism == 
But I am stating facts though, am I not (for my edits on [[Namibia]] and [[versace]] ) ?.  Why would i need a NPOV on facts?  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Singh0833|Singh0833]] ([[User talk:Singh0833|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Singh0833|contribs]]) 01:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: See [[WP:WEIGHT]] and [[WP:SOAPBOX]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

== Take a look ==

at the bottom of my talk page - discussion about the editor you reverted and Number of the Beast. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 19:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

== Samriddhi Edit == 
Dude, I'm a student of the college and have added the external link of the college fest. The old link that is present there is no longer valid. So I request you to kindly check before reverting any edits, don't just blindly do it. The link I had was the link of official college fest website. I won't add it again but you'll have to revert your changes now.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cooljais|Cooljais]] ([[User talk:Cooljais|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cooljais|contribs]]) 07:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Haikaa Yamamoto edit == 
pls. dont be biased regarding this. she had that page even before i edited it. i didnt even create it. she just asked me to add a reference to her book and add a pic. she is notable. has a yahoo link reference: 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/haikaa-debuts-thought-provoking-book-174800209.html

if there are problems, i will just add references but pls. dont delete it just because you saw i edited it. i didnt even make that page. pls. do consider. thanks.
: I don't care who made the pages. I don't send articles to AFD unless I think they deserve to be.  With the exception of [[Jennifer Jolly]], most of the pages you've been involved with don't meet our notability guidelines. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

ok fine, just inform me if you delete a page so i can do a refund.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Eslima5|Eslima5]] ([[User talk:Eslima5|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eslima5|contribs]]) 14:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Most of them are up for deletion, but they won't be deleted until the end of the week long [[WP:AFD]] process. Note that I said nothing about you being a paid editor in the AFD noms. If you challenge them (or engage in [[WP:MEATPUPPETRY]]) I will bring that up.<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

- oh well, il just do a refund if it gets deleted, i just want this done. its been quite a headache for 5 bucks each. no, i wont do meatpuppetry, that will just drag on it. i have a website business that sells products anyway, i was just doing this part time cause my stocks havent arrived yet. thanks.
: Bye. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

==FreePIE==
Hi, you removed my reference to FreePIE in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii_homebrew#GlovePIE,
since GlovePIE is a direct open source equivalent to GlovePIE its very relevant to have it in that article, so please undo your edit.
: Instead, please read [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
:: You should then remove reference to GlovePIE too since they aim to solve same issues, only FreePIE is free and open and the other one is not  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Anders Malmgren|Anders Malmgren]] ([[User talk:Anders Malmgren|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Anders Malmgren|contribs]]) 07:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protection of [[Taiwan]] (again) ==

Hi, could you please undo your protection of [[Taiwan]]? Specifically, I think that it goes against the guideline that pages shouldn't be semi-protected for content disputes if autoconfirmed users are involved ([[WP:SEMI]]), and that it gives autoconfirmed editors an unfair edge in controlling the direction of the content. As the current level of disruption is manageable, I'd prefer that persistent IP edit warriors who refuse to discuss their changes be blocked individually, instead of having all IP editors locked out. Thanks. [[User:Wctaiwan|wctaiwan]] ([[User talk:Wctaiwan|talk]]) 08:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
:(Followup) Actually, I can sort of see where you're coming from, what with dynamic IPs disrupting specific pages. I don't have a good solution, but it does feel like we're favouring the views of registered editors by having the article almost constantly under semi-protection... [[User:Wctaiwan|wctaiwan]] ([[User talk:Wctaiwan|talk]]) 10:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
:: I don't see the dynamic IPs discussing the issue on the talk page.  It's been protected many times before for the same reason. I was also under the impression that there is a pretty strong consensus for the current version (correct me if I'm wrong).  It's troublesome to see never-ending disputes like this (Troubles, Greek/Macedonian/Turkish, etc). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
:::I'm ambivalent. :/ I think I'll ask for others' opinions on the talk page. Thanks. [[User:Wctaiwan|wctaiwan]] ([[User talk:Wctaiwan|talk]]) 08:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

== Catalonia ==

Please, consider revising this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catalonia&diff=508626097&oldid=508624980 It restores a flag in the infobox which was deleted  and justified by a politic. It also deletes a blank section with a map about "cultural expansion of Catalan" (whatever it means) where the image foot said it was the extension of the Catalan (which is false because it includes all Aragon). Sorry for my englsh wwhich is specially bad today.--[[User:Ssola|Ssola]] ([[User talk:Ssola|talk]]) 00:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
: Take it to the article's talk page. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 12:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
== Gynecomastia ==
I understand your issue with too many external links. Is there any chance that we can keep just a few of the links? Perhaps two or three?  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JMZ1122|JMZ1122]] ([[User talk:JMZ1122|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JMZ1122|contribs]]) 23:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for increasing search results to your practice. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

== Facebook Cover Art Section ==

I got a message from you regarding an edit to the Facebook Features page.  I added a section for cover art.  That was not an edit.  That is a new addition to the article.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Akaliquid|Akaliquid]] ([[User talk:Akaliquid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Akaliquid|contribs]]) 19:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Yes, and it was removed because you aren't notable. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

== High-yield investment program ==

I posted an addition concerning the Zeek section, stating that a members were fighting the SEC allegations and provided three different links, all pertaining to this information (the third one was an audio, so I can understand why that was not accepted). I believe if WikiPages is to be relevant, it needs to provide both sides of the story, especially when there is a case currently on-going. So why was my information removed?  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jmcgranahan|Jmcgranahan]] ([[User talk:Jmcgranahan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jmcgranahan|contribs]]) 16:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Please read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], which was already posted on your talk page. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

== You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis! ==

''I conjecture that you have some connection with St. Louis based on your editing history. Please dismiss if this premise is incorrect.''
[[File:Flag_of_St._Louis,_Missouri.svg|60px|right]]
{{{icon|[[File:High-contrast-camera-photo.svg|30px]]}}}
Dust off your Polaroid camera and show off that inner photographer in you. The first-ever '''[[WP:MEET/STL|Wikipedia Takes St. Louis]]'''photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, around noon in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! [[User:Marcus Qwertyus|Marcus Qwertyus]] ([[User talk:Marcus Qwertyus|talk]]) 06:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)



== Your comment on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist page ==

Hi James,

This is Raj.
I think my last point is not clear.
The placing of links is done by someone to tarnish our image.
Our marketing is basically brick and mortar setting.
A simple google search shows our link in spam category....which damages our image and repute.
We are getting affected.Thanks.
[[User:Rajsharma1980|Rajsharma1980]] ([[User talk:Rajsharma1980|talk]]) 04:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potato Valley Cafe ==

{{tb|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potato Valley Cafe}} {{mdash}}<small><font face="arial">[[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup></font></small> 19:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

== Blacklisting ==

Hi! Left you comment at [[WP:SBL#www.bioquestmedical.com]]. Probabaly a misunderstanding? Regards, [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 06:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for September 6==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[List of Kashmiri people]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Munir Dar]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Kashmiri_people|check to confirm]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Kashmiri_people|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


not sure why you are considering my hair restoration advertising, i did not ad anything promotional.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hairplnt|Hairplnt]] ([[User talk:Hairplnt|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hairplnt|contribs]]) 07:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Barnstar ==

{| style="border: 1px solid black; background-color: red; color:yellow"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:HumanSexualityBarnstar.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|Human Sexuality Barnstar]] '''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid black;" | Thank you for watching over and reverting problematic edits on so many [[human sexuality]] articles. You have been a godsend around here. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 23:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 
|}
Since this week, I've been meaning to award you this barnstar. When I started seeing you around some time ago, I wondered how long problematic edits would have stayed in whatever article had you not been there. When I or another editor weren't/aren't there, you were/are. So thank you very much for that. And if you have room for one more, it would be greatly appreciated if you would watch over the [[Sexual intercourse]] article as well. That is, if you aren't already. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 23:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
: Thank you, I really appreciate it.  It's a tough topic, trying to maintain a balance between [[WP:NOTCENSORED]] and the influences of editors with questionable motives. As such, I have high admiration for anyone else willing to wade into those waters, especially those who have much more patience than I do in terms of formulating lengthy and detailed points/counterpoints.  Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
::You're welcome. And tough indeed, and I know that these articles aren't the only articles you watch over and focus reverting problematic edits on. What I stated about you being there when others aren't was extending to a variety of articles, like [[Adolescence]]. So thank you again. Never hesitate to drop me a line about something, especially if it has to do with sexuality. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 05:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

== Glentoran ==
You removed a small paragraph I posted in the recent history part of the Glentoran FC page. There was no reason whatsoever to do this as I didnot express opinions and used ONLY fact. 
Please put my edit back on to the page.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.146.87.149|86.146.87.149]] ([[User talk:86.146.87.149|talk]]) 18:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Your opinions of what "fans think" is decidedly not a fact.  Continue to add unsourced point-of-view content and you will be blocked. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ==

Requesting your comments (conclusive, if possible) @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Tadeusz_Sulimirski_.26_Rahul_Sankrityayan — [[Special:Contributions/117.207.62.240|117.207.62.240]] ([[User talk:117.207.62.240|talk]]) 09:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)