Australian TV networks reprimanded for breaching code of practice: Difference between revisions
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
tweak |
seems substantially redundant |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Last week the ACMA ruled Seven had broken regulations by showing a McDonald's advertisement during children's programming. |
Last week the ACMA ruled Seven had broken regulations by showing a McDonald's advertisement during children's programming. |
||
The ACMA said that Seven and Ten’s breach of the code occurred when the networks failed to give context to the conflict, reporting on the man’s release on bail and subsequent conflict outside court, affecting accuracy and fairness in news. |
|||
{{haveyoursay}} |
{{haveyoursay}} |
||
Revision as of 22:45, 24 September 2011
 |
This article requires pre-publication review by an uninvolved reviewer (one not substantially involved in writing the article). Note, only qualified reviewers may do this and publish articles. This right requires experience with Wikinews policies and procedures. To request the right, apply here.
Reviewers, please use Easy Peer Review per these instructions.
|
| This article requires pre-publication review by an uninvolved reviewer (one not substantially involved in writing the article).
Note, only qualified reviewers may do this and publish articles. This right requires experience with Wikinews policies and procedures. To request the right, apply here.
Reviewers, please use Easy Peer Review per these instructions. -Article last amended: Sep 24 at 22:45:11 UTC (history) Please check the talk page history before reviewing. |
Friday, September 23, 2011
.svg)
Australian networks Seven and Ten have been reprimanded by broadcast regulators the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) for inaccurate and unfair reporting.
The networks were found to have breached the Australian Commercial Television Code of Practice on two counts, following a scuffle outside a court in Melbourne in April 2010, when a cameraman for Channel Nine, Simon Fuller, called Gad Amr, the father of an accused rioter, a terrorist.
The Australian Human Rights Commission claimed the networks gave the impression Mr Amr suddenly lost his temper with Fuller about filming his son Omar.
ACMA found them in breach of the commercial television code of practice, not reporting accurately and fairly, by showing the confrontation without disclosing the provoking “terrorist” comment made by Fuller.
The networks also did not disclose Mr Amr had asked Fuller repeatedly to stop filming — 25 times, as counted by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Media Watch.
The ACMA ruled they were not in breach of the code in portrayal of race, ethnicity, or religion.
Last week the ACMA ruled Seven had broken regulations by showing a McDonald's advertisement during children's programming.
Related news
- "Australia's Channel Seven breaches children TV standards regulations by broadcasting McDonald's advertisement" — Wikinews, September 15, 2011
Sources
- Clare Kermond. "TV networks censured over misleading editing of 'terrorist' video footage" — The Age, September 22, 2011
- Colin Vickery. "Australian TV networks found guilty of breaching code of practice" — Herald Sun, September 21, 2011
- Tim Dick. "Seven and Ten reprimanded over 'terrorist' gibe" — Sydney Morning Herald, September 21, 2011
- Stephen Brook. "Seven, Ten failed to report news fairly" — The Australian, September 21, 2011