Talk:Camila Cabello discography
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Camila Cabello discography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Sequence of 'Other charted songs'
editBeing irrationally reverted by Ss112 (talk · contribs) so I have to use talk page. The current sequence seems to be based on Irish Singles Chart. But Cabello is a Cuban-American singer. Isn't it strange? --U990467 (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's the simple order of how songs were first put on the page. It's not because of the Irish Singles Chart, it's actually just the sequence I placed the songs in as I looked down the first chart I looked at (the New Zealand singles chart). I undid my edits for the moment because I didn't realise how many reverts I had performed. Why do editors need to follow track listing order? Is it just for any kind of order? Ss112 10:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- So many songs entered the chart at the same time. Different countries, different peaks. It hard to sort them simply based on 'Charts'. You can refer to Taylor Swift discography or Ariana Grande discography. --U990467 (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, the charts weren't all published at the same time. The New Zealand chart is the first chart published in a chart week (Friday–Thursday). And yes, but I think you've chosen those because they are two discographies you have contributed extensively to. Personally I wouldn't call either of those pages impeccable examples—they've changed quite a bit since being promoted to FA status, and I notice that Ariana Grande discography is currently fully protected due to editing disputes so there's evidently some disagreement about the standards of it, if we're supposed to follow those. Ss112 10:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't edit the section of 'Other charted songs' both on these two pages. And Ariana Grande discography was fully protected due to a song's single release, not caused by fight for sequence of 'Other charted songs'. If you don't agree with the examples I took, you can check Beyoncé discography. I didn't even touch this featured list.--U990467 (talk) 10:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, even if it is a feature of featured lists (which I know that it commonly is—I'm not disputing that it exists), it's not required or something even covered in promotion of an article to FA. That's all I'm saying. Ss112 10:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's truly a better way to sort songs than simply based on peak chart positions. It's not a big deal to me, either. But your reverts make it have to be taken on the talk page. ;) --U990467 (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, even if it is a feature of featured lists (which I know that it commonly is—I'm not disputing that it exists), it's not required or something even covered in promotion of an article to FA. That's all I'm saying. Ss112 10:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't edit the section of 'Other charted songs' both on these two pages. And Ariana Grande discography was fully protected due to a song's single release, not caused by fight for sequence of 'Other charted songs'. If you don't agree with the examples I took, you can check Beyoncé discography. I didn't even touch this featured list.--U990467 (talk) 10:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, the charts weren't all published at the same time. The New Zealand chart is the first chart published in a chart week (Friday–Thursday). And yes, but I think you've chosen those because they are two discographies you have contributed extensively to. Personally I wouldn't call either of those pages impeccable examples—they've changed quite a bit since being promoted to FA status, and I notice that Ariana Grande discography is currently fully protected due to editing disputes so there's evidently some disagreement about the standards of it, if we're supposed to follow those. Ss112 10:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- So many songs entered the chart at the same time. Different countries, different peaks. It hard to sort them simply based on 'Charts'. You can refer to Taylor Swift discography or Ariana Grande discography. --U990467 (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2018
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
album (camila) certified gold in australia source: http://www.aria.com.au/pages/AlbumAccreds2018.htm Baevus (talk) 06:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Baveus: Not done The information is not located on that page. The word Camila is not even mentioned at the link. Ss112 12:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Where to put Real Friends (solo version), to promotional singles, or combining both versions to singles?
editA discussion: Where to put Real Friends (solo version), to promotional singles, or combining both versions to singles? --Micrapow (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- You can't combinate both versions to singles cause the solo version is promotional and the feautring is a single. This version is ok, but do not add Belgium, only 10 chart peak posititons. --Miaow 16:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Real Friends (remix) and album version are both promotional singles so should be altogether clubbed under "promotional singles". Nowhere on internet is it confirmed to be a single released by Camila Cabello.
Certifications of both singles Consequences & OMG
editBeing repeatedly reverted by Miaow (talk · contribs) so I have to use talk page. According to this, Camila Cabello's single Consequences is actually certified Gold in Canada. It does need a discussion. Secondly, I can't get why she actually could see "May 30, 2018 Platinum Single Camila Cabello OMG" said here and then said "It says Gold (featuring Quavo)". --H9v9n9 (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Because sources only credits Cabello and not Quavo. Sources says OMG ft. Quavo, Gold. Same with Consequences, it's not the orchestra version but the original version released a year ago. Best regards. --Miaow 23:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- According to this, "OMG" is already certified Platinum in Canada, whether Music Canada credits (featuring Quavo) or not, because she doesn't have another song called "OMG" apart from "OMG (ft. Quavo)". Moreover, I admit that "Consequences" (orchestra) is the single and I don't have any source saying "Consequences" (album version) is also released singly at present and I don't want to alter this, however, the Music Canada certification only credits the original version (RIAA certification too), even the Number 1 hit Girls Like You didn't credits Cardi B in its RIAA certificatoon but credited the original version. According to Maroon 5 discography, the Girls Like You (ft. Cardi B) certification just used the certification for both versions actually which only credited the original version because of the rules made by the certification organization. Best regards to Miss Miaow. In the future, the problematic question will be raised again, because Consequences (orchestra) will never be certified separately from Consequences (album version) by both Music Canada and RIAA and they will only credit both versions together, though actually the certification directs to the single Consequences and it's not necessary to list this gold certification to the album version into Camila Cabello discography#Other charted songs. So add "MC: Gold" to the single "Consequences" (orchestral version) from Camila Cabello discography#As lead artist or the Camila Cabello discography#Other charted songs "Consequences (original version)", let's discuss, pick one. --H9v9n9(talk) 07:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- @H9v9n9: I'm in agreement with your changes after sources provided. Thank you. Cheers! --Miaow 18:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- According to this, "OMG" is already certified Platinum in Canada, whether Music Canada credits (featuring Quavo) or not, because she doesn't have another song called "OMG" apart from "OMG (ft. Quavo)". Moreover, I admit that "Consequences" (orchestra) is the single and I don't have any source saying "Consequences" (album version) is also released singly at present and I don't want to alter this, however, the Music Canada certification only credits the original version (RIAA certification too), even the Number 1 hit Girls Like You didn't credits Cardi B in its RIAA certificatoon but credited the original version. According to Maroon 5 discography, the Girls Like You (ft. Cardi B) certification just used the certification for both versions actually which only credited the original version because of the rules made by the certification organization. Best regards to Miss Miaow. In the future, the problematic question will be raised again, because Consequences (orchestra) will never be certified separately from Consequences (album version) by both Music Canada and RIAA and they will only credit both versions together, though actually the certification directs to the single Consequences and it's not necessary to list this gold certification to the album version into Camila Cabello discography#Other charted songs. So add "MC: Gold" to the single "Consequences" (orchestral version) from Camila Cabello discography#As lead artist or the Camila Cabello discography#Other charted songs "Consequences (original version)", let's discuss, pick one. --H9v9n9(talk) 07:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Consequences (Original version) was released as official single in October 9, 2018
editBoth versions are officially third and final single off Camila. The original version impacted the contemporary hit radio firstly on Oct 9, the orchestra version impacted secondly on Oct 16. This is the proofthe original version of Consequences was impact the US contemporary hit radio in Oct 9, 2018.[1 1] So, both versions are supposed to listed as Cabello's single on Camila Cabello discography#As lead artist.--H9v9n9(talk) 21:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- ^ "Consequences (Original version) — Top 40/M Future Releases | Mainstream Hit Songs Being Released and Their Release Dates …". All Access Media Group. October 9, 2018. Archived from the original on 2018-10-09.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)
A suggestion on 24 January 2019
editI'm suggesting that every charted remix should be added to section "Other charted songs" (renamed "Other charted songs or remixes" or "Remixes and other charted songs" then.) --H9v9n9(talk) 17:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. This makes more sense than Real Friends (remix) being a single which was never legitimately announced or assumed as such — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumystic (talk • contribs)
- Strongly disagree. In "Other charted songs" are listed songs that aren't released individually on itunes. --Miaow 17:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
A suggestion on February 18, 2019: "Never Be the Same" ft. Kane Brown wasn't released as single
editCan someone please explain why Camila Cabello discography single as lead artist section listed both "Never Be the Same" Original version and featuring Kane Brown version as official singles? Obviously the charted positions are the original version's. The remix didn't charted. If so it can be removed because Ariana Grande discography#As lead artist didn't list "7 rings Remix" ft. 2 Chainz and the mistaken one between these two must be corrected. --H9v9n9(talk) 14:19, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
It's unfair "7 rings Remix" didn't appear on Ariana Grande discography but "Never Be the Same Remix" was kept on Camila Cabello discography.--H9v9n9 (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Halsey discography also didn't list "Without Me" original version together with "Without Me ft. Juice WRLD" remix, but listed Alone Remix because "Alone ft. Big Sean & Stefflon Don" was released as official single, and shot a music video and was re-added to the album tracklist. "Never Be the Same ft. Kane Brown" was the same as "Without Me ft. Juice WRLD" and "7 rings ft. 2 Chainz". The chart positions were all the Original version's so the remix shouldn't be listed along with the original version if the original single was the only one that was released as the official single.--H9v9n9 (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.153.128.85 (talk) 09:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
A suggestion on March 30, 2019
editShould her vertical videos be added to the music video section?--H9v9n9 (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think so. They should be there. --Miaow 17:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Same as a single?
editUh.. why is same put as a single in her discography? It got registered on bmi but we all know that it can be faked. Plus camila has never mentioned the song at all... nor released a snippet with the word "same". You should remove that.
Why would Billiekhalidfan insist "Never Be the Same" Remix featuring Kane Brown is on discography?
edit"Bad Guy" with Justin Bieber isn’t on Billie Eilish discography. "Without Me" with/featuring Juice WRLD isn’t on Halsey discography. Both these remixes are not officially the artists’ singles. So why insist re-adding the (solo or featuring Kane Brown) when it’s already discussed and not allowed to be re-added? Problems? Clearly don’t do this because of you seeing both versions of Consequences appearing on the discography and being misleaded by it because both versions of Consequences impacted US radio and are officially the third single off Camila but "Never Be the Same" Remix isn’t an official single because the original version is already an official single, similarly, "Havana (Remix)" with Daddy Yankee. "Real Friends" remix is on the discography because "Real Friends" is an promotional single and was intentionally to be released as the third official single but later canceled because of the third single project later chose "Consequences". --H9v9n9 (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- It is a single. It's in Brown's discography as a single. And it hasn't "already [been] discussed and [is not] not allowed to be re-added". One IP saying they agree isn't consensus. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 19:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
"Cry for Me" and "Easy" as singles.
editWhy are "Cry for Me" and "Easy" being listed as promotional singles here? There are sources calling both of these songs singles [1][2] (there are more sources). Did Camila Cabello and/or her label say that these aren't singles? CountyCountry (talk) 22:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Yes her manager say that this songs were only tracks Maxgoldman12334 (talk) 23:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- I saw the link to the manager's Twitter post in Talk:Romance (Camila Cabello album). It seems that he is saying that there are no singles from the album; he is not only referring to "Cry for Me" and "Easy" if I'm not mistaken. His post is clearly not true because Epic Records did confirm that "Liar" and "Shameless" are singles [3] and those two songs will be in the album. CountyCountry (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- @CountyCountry: I completely agree with you. There are sources labeling all four songs as singles, so there is no reason to label the less successful singles as promotional singles. 𝔹𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕖𝕜𝕙𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕕𝕗𝕒𝕟 💬 03:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- I saw the link to the manager's Twitter post in Talk:Romance (Camila Cabello album). It seems that he is saying that there are no singles from the album; he is not only referring to "Cry for Me" and "Easy" if I'm not mistaken. His post is clearly not true because Epic Records did confirm that "Liar" and "Shameless" are singles [3] and those two songs will be in the album. CountyCountry (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Is she actually has a live album?
editI saw a live album appear in her Apple Music profile, and it's called "NMD Presents: Camila Cabello". SamieFrost22 (talk) 16:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Cinderella Soundtrack
editI had a question, should the Cinderella soundtrack be added to her discography? Maybe as a soundtrack category? Or since it’s a soundtrack full of covers maybe just adding “Million To One” to ‘Guest Appearances’ since it’s only the original song covered by her or will it not be added at all? If someone knows help me out just to know. Idkwtplo (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
"Psychofreaks" listed at Redirects for discussion
editA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Psychofreaks. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 6#Psychofreaks until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Spanish chart
editHi, can someone add Spain in singles and album charts? Because Camilla is doing good in the country (especially her last 2 singles) and it should be showed in the page of her discography. Thank you in advance !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.4.250.54 (talk) 15:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)