Binomial nomenclature: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
re-wrote some of the lead to improve clarity and accuracy; more work needed for both clarity and accuracy in relation to two codes
moved some duplicated material to clarify the article
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:
{{Redirect|Latin name|personal names in the Roman empire|Roman naming conventions}}
{{Refimprove|date=June 2007}}
The formal system of naming [[species]] of living things is called '''binomialBinomial nomenclature''', (also called '''binomi<u>n</u>al nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature'''.) Eachis a formal system of naming [[species]] isof givenliving athings formalby giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which are based in some way on the [[Latin]] language. Such a name is called a '''binomial name''' (which may be shortened to just "binomial"), a '''binomialbinomen''' or a '''binomenscientific name''', or; more informally it is also called a '''Latin name'''. The first part of the name identifies the [[genus]] to which the species belongs; the second part identifies the species within the genus. For example, humans belong to genus ''Homo'' and within this genus to the species ''Homo sapiens''. The introduction of this system of naming species is usually credited to [[Linnaeus]].
 
The application of binomial nomenclature is now governed by various internationally agreed codes of rules, of which the two most important are [[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature]] for animals and the [[International Code of Botanical Nomenclature]] for plants. Although the general principles underlying binomial nomenclature are common to these two codes, there are some differences in the terminology they use and their precise rules. For example:
* '"Binomial nomenclature'" is the correct term for botany,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0046Ch4Sec2a042.htm |title=International Code Of Botanical Nomenclature Online |publisher=Ibot.sav.sk |date= |accessdate=2010-03-28}}</ref> although it is also used by zoologists.<ref>Diane Schmidt and George H. Bell, ''[http://books.google.com.au/books?id=EqJrbvJU4uwC&pg=PA4 Guide to reference and information sources in the zoological sciences]'', Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003, ISBN 1563089777, p. 4.</ref> Since 1953, "binomi<u>n</u>al nomenclature" is the technically correct term in zoology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp?article=11&nfv=true |title=International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature we site |publisher=Iczn.org |date= |accessdate=2010-03-28}}</ref>
* Both codes agree in calling the first part of the two-part name for a species the '"genus name'". However in zoological nomenclature the second part is called the '"species name'", whereas in botanical nomenclature the second part is called the '"species epithet'", and the term '"species name'" should only be used for the whole name, i.e. the combination of the two parts.
* Since 1953, 'binomi<u>n</u>al nomenclature' is the technically correct term in zoology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp?article=11&nfv=true |title=International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature we site |publisher=Iczn.org |date= |accessdate=2010-03-28}}</ref>
* Both codes agree in calling the first part of the two-part name for a species the 'genus name'. However in zoological nomenclature the second part is called the 'species name', whereas in botanical nomenclature the second part is called the 'species epithet', and the term 'species name' should only be used for the whole name, i.e. the combination of the two parts.
<!--bit below needs more work! User:Peter coxhead-->
The two-part name of a species is also commonly known as its '''Latin name''', since every two-part scientific name is either formed out of (modern scientific) [[Latin]] or is a Latinized version of words from other languages. However, [[biologist]]s and [[philologist]]s prefer to use the term '''scientific name''' rather than "Latin name", because the words used to create these names are not always from the Latin language, even though words from other languages have usually been Latinized in order to make them suitable for this purpose. Species names are often derived from [[Ancient Greek]] words, or words from numerous other languages. Frequently species names are based on the surname of a person, such as a well-regarded scientist, or are a Latinized version of a relevant place name.
 
[[Carl Linnaeus]] chose a convenient short-hand binomial [[nomenclature]] scheme for species, using only the genus name and the [[specific name (zoology)|specific name]] (the term now used in zoology) or the [[specific name (botany)|specific epithet]] (the term now used in botany). Together these form the whole name of the species. The first letter of the first name, the genus, is always capitalized, while that of the second is not, even when derived from a [[proper noun]] such as the name of a person or place. Conventionally, all names of genera and lower taxa are always italicised, while family names and higher taxa are printed in plain text. Species can be divided into a further [[Taxonomic rank|rank]], giving rise to a ''[[trinomial nomenclature|trinomial name]]'' for a [[subspecies]] (''[[trinomen]]'' for animals, ''[[infraspecific name (botany)|infraspecific name]]'' for plants).
 
Biologists, when using a name of a species, usually also give the authority and date of the species description. Thus zoologists will give the name of a particular sea snail species as: ''[[Patella vulgata]]'' Linnaeus, 1758. The name "Linnaeus" tells the reader who it was that described the species; 1758 is the date of the publication in which the original description can be found, in this case the book ''[[Systema Naturae]]''.
Line 16 ⟶ 13:
== History ==
[[File:Carl von Linné.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Carolus Linnaeus]] (1707–1778), a Swedish botanist, invented the modern system of binomial nomenclature.]]
The adoption by biologists of a system of binomial nomenclature is due to [[Sweden|Swedish]] [[botanist]] and [[physician]] Carl von Linné, also known by his Latinized name [[Carolus Linnaeus]] (1707–1778). Linnaeus attempted to describe the entire known natural world. He chose a convenient short-hand binomial scheme for species, givingusing only the genus name and the [[specific name (zoology)|specific name]] or [[specific name (botany)|specific epithet]] (the terms now used in zoology and botany respectively). Together these form the whole name of the species. Linnaeus attempted to give every species ([[mineral]], [[plant]], or [[animal]]) a two-part name. This was an improvement over descriptive names that involved a whole descriptive phrase comprising numerous words. However, binomial nomenclature in various forms had existed before Linnaeus, and was used by the [[Bauhin]]s, who lived nearly two hundred years earlier.{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}}
 
== Value ==
Line 27 ⟶ 24:
== Derivation ==
{{see also|list of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names}}
The two-part name of a species is also commonly known as its '''Latin name''', since every two-part scientific name is either formed out of (modern scientific) [[Latin]] or is a Latinized version of words from other languages. However, [[biologist]]s and [[philologist]]s prefer to use the term '''scientific name''' rather than "Latin name", because the words used to create these names are not always from the Latin language, even though words from other languages have usually been Latinized in order to make them suitable for this purpose. Species names are often derived from [[Ancient Greek]] words, or words from numerous other languages. Frequently species names are based on the surname of a person, such as a well-regarded scientist, or are a Latinized version of a relevant place name.
 
The genus name and specific descriptor may come from any source. Often they are ordinary [[New Latin]] words, but they may also come from [[Ancient Greek]], from a place, from a person (often a naturalist), a name from the local language etc. In fact, taxonomists come up with specific descriptors from a variety of sources, including [[in-joke]]s and [[pun]]s. However, names are always treated grammatically as if they were a Latin phrase.