Rejectwater
| This is Rejectwater's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
Hi Rejectwater. There are unaddressed comments at your FLC nomination. Could you please address them? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Fuck peer review, again
- Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
- Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James E. Norris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Norris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
NHL Seasons
How exactly is indicating when a team made the playoffs with a certain color redundant and unnecessary? It's like that for all the other sports so why is it any different for ice hockey? ThatSportsGuy (talk) 16:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC) --it's redundant because there's a "Playoff results" column that lists whether or not the team made the playoffs and if so what the outcome was. It's very easy to tell which seasons the team made the post season as a result. The "unneccessary" bits were things like a definition for "TG" and color code for Presidents' Trophy, neither of which are applicable. Don't know what you mean by "it's like that for all other sports". There are a handful of Western Conference NHL teams that have this on their "list of seasons" pages (all non-FL), but it's redundant regardless. Rejectwater (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)