Talk:Sechsschartenturm, Heavy MG bunker, La Mare Mill

Military history: Fortifications / European / German / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Jersey Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jersey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jersey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject JerseyTemplate:WikiProject JerseyJersey articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

an appeal

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

please add stuff

especially images

-Note: Sechsschartentürme is plural. Singular is Sechsschartenturm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.212.142.141 (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

that is annoying

Referencing, the lack of

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Much of this text is copied from a highly critical view of German defences in an article being created by me for a forum which has yet to be published

what we need it some referencing (as I don't think I can reference my article) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fdsdh1 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Publish the article and state here that the article now exists in some findable form. Then other editors can cite it. Acad Ronin (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

ok, I will get it published, it may take some time as it has to be proof read by two mods first. (Fdsdh1 (talk) 19:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)) just tested the link, it is one blocked by wikipedia (it is .freeforums, which is blocked I think) I have submitted for unblocking: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#University_of_Kent_Military_History_Society_ForumsReply

(Fdsdh1 (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC))Reply

Request for info

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Fdshd1, do we know what the manning level was for the bunker, and what the traverse was for the machine guns? I assume the guns covered an arc in excess of 60°, but it would be nice to know for sure. Also, was the "searclight" actually a spotlight, and what was the epicscope's function? Lastly, looking at the UofK Military History Society article on the SAS, one thing that concerns me is that that article did not cite sources. I don't like to link to a source that doesn't cite books, articles in print journals, and the like, because a source that doesn't tell you where the info comes from doesn't actually contribute verifiability. Acad Ronin (talk) 22:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Only the essays on the site are referenced, that is the only problem. I am thinking of buying a book about bunkers so, I am sure all will be explained in that.(Fdsdh1 (talk) 10:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC))Reply