HuckDoll21

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Huck Magazine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Huck Magazine constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:17, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Huck Magazine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Friendly suggestion

Now you know that just blanking that article with an edit summary that isn't understandable to anyone does not work. Your next decision is whether you'll keep doing something that doesn't work and be blocked, or explain on the talk page what part of this article is a violation of "trademark" (a term that doesn't seem to apply here, but perhaps you mean 'copyright?') and what you'd like to do to correct the problem. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)