Headbomb
| User | Talk | Archives | My work | Sandbox | Resources | News | Stats |
|---|
|
|
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Articles with outdated impact factors
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Articles with outdated impact factors on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
You may be interested...
... in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Redirects to Regnery Publishing because I recall you have an interesting in publishing. Or equally you may not be interested! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Headbomb, I wonder whether Mir@bel should be in the relevant journals' Abstracting and Indexing section. What do you think? Nobody (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Still waiting for a reply, Headbomb. Nobody (talk) 07:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @1AmNobody24: the main question is Mir@bel a comprehensive or selective indexing service. If it aims to catalog everything in a field, then it's not selective and unlikely to need to be mentioned. Same if it's just mining other databases to create a super database. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- From what I've found online it's focused on humanities and social sciences journals, is that enough to consider it selective? Nobody (talk) 06:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- @1AmNobody24: the main question is Mir@bel a comprehensive or selective indexing service. If it aims to catalog everything in a field, then it's not selective and unlikely to need to be mentioned. Same if it's just mining other databases to create a super database. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Third opinion requested
Hi Headbomb,
you are kindly invited to provide third opinion in the following dispute: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tercer#Quantum_entanglement_lead
Thank you so much in advance for your time. 217.118.83.168 (talk) 19:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the cleanup
That Delete the PMC URL bug was big oops. The code now checks for that (and logs it). Putting on my LtCol hat, I would be very annoyed if one of the people under me did what I did. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 17:06, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Good thing on Wikipedia, nobody knows you're a dog. You could wear a Private's beret, though personally, I've always been partial to an admiral's bicorn! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)