Talk:Tsujigiri

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Slywriter (talk | contribs) at 15:31, 28 January 2024 (Misleading introduction: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 9 months ago by Slywriter in topic Misleading introduction
WikiProject iconJapan Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:34, November 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None


Word and relationship to drive-by killings

I love this word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.9.48 (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Edo version of drive-by killings. Humanity has not progressed an inch since. :-I — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.230.148.3 (talk) 23:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ah well, at least drive-by's are being considered amoral. A little but important progress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.201.79.140 (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is also important to note that drive-by's are done for the purpose of killing one's enemies (or those perceived to be enemies), not merely for amusement or to test out new weapons. So in this very important aspect, society has progressed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.157.143 (talk) 09:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources and Edo period

According to this page, tsujigiri "was especially rampant during the early Edo period", which started in 1603. However, tsujigiri was prohibited by the government in 1602. Aside from this specific problem there is a more general problem with this page: it is very difficult to verify. There seem to be very few, if any, reliable sources on tsujigiri. Most available sources on the internet just seem to copy each other, and in history books the phenomenon is rarely mentioned. (I do remember reading somewhere (in Japanese) that even before the formal prohibition, the practice was not (morally or otherwise) accepted, and that those who practiced tsujigiri in the Edo period were not samurai, but bands of criminals from which later the yakuza evolved. Unfortunately I cannot find this source again.) In any case, it would be useful if someone with more expertise in relevant aspects of Japanese history could look into the subject and improve this page, but until then, I would suggest marking the page in some way to show that its reliability is questionable. Lajosb (talk) 04:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Contradiction?

The section "Mary Midgley's "Trying Out One's New Sword"" says:

> Contrary to her description, however, the historical record provides no indication that it was ever condoned. Nor is it clear that samurai actually slashed people in the street for the purpose of testing their swords. The idea that tsujigiri was done as a means of testing a sword may derive from confusion with the term tameshigiri, meaning "test-cutting".

However, the article's introduction says:

> Tsujigiri (辻斬り or 辻斬, literally "crossroads killing") is a Japanese term for a practice when a samurai, after receiving a new katana or developing a new fighting style or weapon, tests its effectiveness by attacking a human opponent, usually a random defenseless passer-by, in many cases during nighttime.

This seems to me to be a contradiction. BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Samurai

they went beast mode. 142.147.101.48 (talk) 05:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Misleading introduction

This presents is as common and accepted. It should be much clearer than it was neither. Slywriter (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply