Talk:One Must Fall: Battlegrounds

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JimmyBlackwing (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 31 December 2022 (start). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 16 years ago by 84.249.50.213 in topic One Must Fall: Battleground tiers - Bias?
WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

One Must Fall: Battleground tiers - Bias?

I noticed one rather "funny" sentence in this part: "While most modern fighting games also suffer from this..." As a fighting game fan, I find this kind of humorous and not at all true. While i could rave on and on how inaccurate it is, i won't bother wasting time and just ask, that maybe it should be changed to "While some modern fighting games..."? That would perhaps be more accurate. 84.249.50.213 (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Omfbattlegroundslogo.JPG

 

Image:Omfbattlegroundslogo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Omfbgss.JPG

 

Image:Omfbgss.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply