PureRED

Please be kind, there's a human behind the username.

---

Think I've made a mistake? It's more than possible! Please let me know below and I'll be happy to discuss any issue with you.

Your revert concerning Dental Degree

The problem would seem to be that we most probably shouldn't presume or assume that users know and/or understand what, specifically, needs to have a separate proper citation and what doesn't (particularly where we shouldn't encourage overtly multiplicous use of the same reference to establish different points of citation within the context of WP:POV, etc.) - hence, I am of the opinion that citation needed tags should be used in a manner that is particularly clear as to identify each specific fact, allegation, or other material that needs a separate proper citation. If this is the incorrect way to go about it, please enlighten me on the proper WP policies and the specific templates that should be used to accomplish the well-intentioned goal, there. 98.178.191.34 (talk) 23:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Then discuss that opinion on the talk page. The article is already marked with a "Citation Needed" maintenance tag. PureRED | talk to me | 23:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

"Please be kind, there's a human behind the username."

Great advice! It would also be nice if people reverted with more care, and with a rationale that actually addresses the merits/lack of merits of the edit, than whatever rote screed you said when you reverted me, which was actually quite rude, come to think of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B020:44F:89E5:3DFE:6524:9476 (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

If the default WP warning templates are something you consider rude, I hate to break it to you, but you're going to be seeing a lot of 'em. You clearly have strong opinions on whatever topic was reverted--and that's great--but removing well sourced content because you disagree with it isn't how this place works. I'd encourage you to contribute to the article's talk page if you have potentially contentious items to add and have concerns about them being reverted.

This will be the final response from me in this thread. Have a great evening! PureRED | talk to me | 03:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

You too, no hard feelings. Some of us see ourselves as driveby helpers, not vandals. Ill go to the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B020:44F:89E5:3DFE:6524:9476 (talk) 03:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Interested in a wiki page

How do i go about getting a page created for an artist! Young tapz (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi there! Visit the Wikipedia:Articles for creation page to get started with an article. I'd recommend reading it carefully to get a good start. PureRED | talk to me | 15:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

A message from Official PA Bio

Official PA Bio (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)I simply had moved the content to lower in the body

Ah, my apologies if that's the case. Just be sure to add an edit summary when removing content blocks in separate edits. It can be tricky to see if something's been moved instead of completely deleted when it's done in staggered edits. Summaries help clarify for everyone. Thanks, PureRED | talk to me | 17:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

No Name (novel)

The stuff removed seems to be about some other work than this novel. --Erp (talk) 00:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Great catch! Thanks for keeping an eye out. Apologies for any extra work. Thanks, PureRED | talk to me | 02:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Pedro Pascal

Hi, I’m not sure why you keep adding information that isn’t relevant to Pedro Pascal? Pedro was never involved with what happened within his dad’s career and also sharing the details surrounding his mother’s death which is private unsourced information is deeply disrespectful.

Everything else about Lux and other members of his family that has been publicly discussed can be included as he shared it or gave permission but the above mentioned pieces aren’t relevant and should be removed 🤷🏼‍♀️ Luckypascal (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Please take it to the article's talk page. I'm not interested in discussing this with you, nor do I intend do. PureRED | talk to me | 06:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

So basically you can’t justify your actions is what you’re saying 💀🤣 Luckypascal (talk) 06:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)