Icositrigon

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WikiCleanerBot (talk | contribs) at 22:31, 22 January 2021 (v2.04b - Bot T19 CW#25 - Fix errors for CW project (Heading hierarchy - Reference before punctuation - Link equal to linktext)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In geometry, an icositrigon (or icosikaitrigon) or 23-gon is a 23-sided polygon. The icositrigon has the distinction of being the smallest regular polygon that is not neusis constructible.

Regular icositrigon
A regular icositrigon
TypeRegular polygon
Edges and vertices23
Schläfli symbol{23}
Coxeter–Dynkin diagrams
Symmetry groupDihedral (D23), order 2×23
Internal angle (degrees)≈164.348°
PropertiesConvex, cyclic, equilateral, isogonal, isotoxal
Dual polygonSelf

Regular icositrigon

A regular icositrigon is represented by Schläfli symbol {23}.

A regular icositrigon has internal angles of   degrees, with an area of   where   is side length and   is the inradius, or apothem.

In addition to not being constructible with a compass and straightedge or angle trisection,[1] on account of the number 23 being neither a Fermat nor Pierpont prime, the regular icositrigon is the smallest regular polygon that is not constructible even with neusis, after the discovery of neusis construction of the hendecagon by Elliot Benjamin and Chip Snyder in 2014.[2]

Concerning the nonconstructability of the regular icositrigon, A. Baragar (2002) showed it is not possible to construct a regular 23-gon using only a compass and twice-notched straightedge by demonstrating that every point constructible with said method lies in a tower of fields over   such that  , being a sequence of nested fields in which the degree of the extension at each step is 2, 3, 5, or 6.

Suppose   in   is constructible using a compass and twice-notched straightedge. Then   belongs to a field   that lies in a tower of fields   for which the index [  : Kj−1] at each step is 2, 3, 5, or 6. In particular, if  [ :  ], then the only primes dividing   are 2, 3, and 5. (Theorem 5.1)

If we can construct the regular p-gon, then we can construct  , which is the root of an irreducible polynomial of degree    . By Theorem 5.1,   lies in a field   of degree   over  , where the only primes that divide   are 2, 3, and 5. But  [ ] is a subfield of  , so     divides  . In particular, for  ,   must be divisible by 11, and for  , N must be divisible by 7.[3]

It should also be noted that an icositrigon is not origami constructible either, given 23 is not a Pierpont prime, nor a power of two or three.[4] However, it can be made constructible via the use of the Quadratrix of Hippias, Archimedean spiral, and other auxiliary curves; yet this is true for all regular polygons.[5]


Approximate construction

 
A proximity construction animation

Based on the unit circle r = 1 [unit of length]

  • Constructed side length of the icositrigon in GeoGebra (Display max 15 decimal places)  
  • Side length of the icositrigon  
  • Absolute error of the constructed side length
Up to the max. displayed 15 decimal places is the absolute error 
  • Constructed central angle of the icositrigon in GeoGebra (display significant 13 decimal places, rounded)  
  • Central angle of the icositrigon  
  • Absolute error of the constructed central angle
Up to the rounded significant 13 decimal places is the absolute error  

Example to illustrate the error

At a circumscribed circle radius r = 1 billion km (the light needed for this distance about 55 minutes), the absolute error of the 1st side would be < 1 mm.

Below is a table of five regular icositrigrams, or star 23-gons, labeled with their respective Schläfli symbol {23/q}, 2   q   11 where q is prime.

 
{23/2}
 
{23/3}
 
{23/5}
 
{23/7}
 
{23/11}

References

  1. ^ Tomahawk-nonconstructible n-gons OEIS; https://oeis.org/A048136
  2. ^ Benjamin, Elliot; Snyder, C. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society156.3 (May 2014): 409-424.; https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305004113000753
  3. ^ Arthur Baragar (2002) Constructions Using a Compass and TwiceNotched Straightedge, The American Mathematical Monthly, 109:2, 151-164, DOI: 10.1080/00029890.2002.11919848 https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2002.11919848
  4. ^ Young Lee, H. (2017) Origami-Constructible Numbers University of Georgia https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/lee_hwa-young_201712_ma.pdf
  5. ^ P. Milici, R. Dawson The equiangular compass December 1st, 2012, The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 34, Issue 4 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pietro_Milici2/publication/257393577_The_Equiangular_Compass/links/5d4c687da6fdcc370a8725e0/The-Equiangular-Compass.pdf

Detection of Interesting Properties in Regular Polygons