Canadian Bill of Rights: Difference between revisions

Criticism of the Bill of Rights has mostly centred on its limited effect. The ineffectiveness of the Bill of Rights in achieving its stated aim was the main reason that two decades later, it was thought necessary<ref name=Kasoff>{{Cite book| last1 = Kasoff| first1 = Mark J. | last2 = James| first2 = Patrick| title = Canadian Studies in the New Millennium, Second Edition (Google eBook)| publisher = University of Toronto Press| year = 2013| location = Toronto, Ontario, Canada| page = | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=gYqBAAAAQBAJ&pg=PT95&dqq=%22both+the+supreme+court+and+the+bill+of+rights+quickly+came+to+be+perceived+as+ineffective%22&hlpg=en&sa=X&ei=ZCRSUoniIMz3rAHy6oHgAQ&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22both%20the%20supreme%20court%20and%20the%20bill%20of%20rights%20quickly%20came%20to%20be%20perceived%20as%20ineffective%22&f=falsePT95| isbn = 978-1-4426-4693-3}}</ref> to adopt a constitutionally-entrenched charter.