Content deleted Content added
no source |
Minor cleanup. |
||
Line 23:
In 2010, because of a post on the [[People Search]] forum, a mother and son reunited 17 years after the son was [[kidnap]]ped.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timeslive.co.za/news/article287206.ece |title=Mother and son reunited 17 years after kidnap |access-date=22 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100204101345/http://www.timeslive.co.za/news/article287206.ece |archive-date=4 February 2010 |date=1 February 2010 |last=Cohen |first=Lauren |newspaper=[[The Times (South Africa)|The Times]] |publisher=[[Avusa]] Inc.}}</ref>
City-data has been featured in articles and [[listicles]] as a way for potential newcomers to learn more about particular cities.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://lifehacker.com/how-to-learn-all-about-a-new-city-without-leaving-your-511561572 |title=How to Learn All About a New City Without Leaving Your House |work=[[Lifehacker]] |first=Alan |last=Henry |date=6 June 2013 |access-date=15 August 2019 |publisher=[[Gizmodo Media Group]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/richest-neighborhoods-in-southern-california-2014-4|title=The 27 Richest Neighborhoods In Southern California|last=Cooperstein|first=Paige|website=Business Insider|access-date=2020-04-09}}</ref> However, the public forums section of the website has also experienced extensive [[Internet trolling]], [[bias]], and spread of misinformation since the site’s inception. The website has a 1.3/5 approval rating from [[SiteJabber]].<ref>[https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/city-data.com]</ref>
== See also ==
| |||