Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→On wbm1058's evidence section: #2. – actually *three* times |
→Jytdog restricted (2): +resp |
||
Line 243:
:::::There are many, many other useful edits Jytdog can do. There are plenty of other editors who can revert obvious quackery. He can report it to WikiProject Medicine. His repeated reverting and then templating those who revert him for edit warring and then getting angrier and angrier is a significant part of his behaviour as [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] pointed out. He also did it to Beall4 and then branded her as "melting down". I agree that it is a symptom of the core problem of his attitude to other people. But if he is ever allowed back, he needs multiple restrictions to curb his impulsive and aggressive behaviour and its symptoms. [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 07:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
::::::Of itself, reverting the addition of unreliable or promotional medical content is a good thing, to be commended. It would be bad to have a system whereby WPMED (under strain at the best of times) was encumbered by a reporting system for routine editing jobs. Jytdog had no real problem with working with <u>content</u>, but with <u>people</u>, and I agree the reversion is just a symptom. I am beginning to think we don't need to craft anything ingenious to prevent the problem, but just do it plainly. Maybe something like "Jytdog is reminded that [[WP:CIVIL]] is a core Wikipedia policy and is required to pay scrupulous attention to abiding by it in each and every edit." (This particular wording is chosen because he also had a habit of making very intemperate comments only to redact/remove them a couple of minutes later ... but what is written cannot be so easily un-written). [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] ([[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]) 08:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::::Alexbrn, I disagree. My diffs on the evidence page show that Jytdog can't even be trusted with reverting unreliable or promotional medical content, because his judgement on what constitutes that kind of content is skewed, heavy-handed, aggressive, and uncooperative. He will go back to reverting minor breeches of MEDRS as if the world is on fire, and will argue for every revert he makes, saying it was ''warranted''; the last thing we want is to turn his less reasonable reverts into a topic of discussion every time he makes one. If he comes back at all and is allowed to edit, I agree that 0RR is more tolerable than fighting with him over his aggressive viewpoint on what can or cannot be left in an article for 10 minutes. [[User:Julia W|<b style="color: #4B0082;">Julia</b>]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Julia W|<span style="color: #008080;">talk</span>]]</sup> 14:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
====Jytdog restricted (3)====
| |||