Content deleted Content added
→Excellent source: rm dupe |
→Excellent source: rm dupe |
||
Line 16:
Surely this nonsense is not worth an entry. She has no accomplishments. And if this kerfuffle is in any way significant from an "Instagram influencer" perspective. It should be in that article as a relic of online ephemera. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Glindathebest|Glindathebest]] ([[User talk:Glindathebest#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Glindathebest|contribs]]) 05:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{ping|Glindathebest}} If you think she [[WP:GNG|isn't notable]] you could take the article to [[WP:AFD|articles for deletion]]. Given that the NYT have just published an article about her, though, I think you might not be successful. [[User:Wham2001|Wham2001]] ([[User talk:Wham2001|talk]]) 06:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
== Excellent source ==
[https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/9/11/20860607/caroline-calloway-natalie-beach-explained Best sourcing, with links to additional third party sources, found on Vox]. Incorporating the facts would improve this article by leaps and bounds. I don't have time to be bold. //[[USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] <small>( [[User Talk:Blaxthos|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blaxthos|c]] )</small> 12:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
== excellent source ==
|