Content deleted Content added
Tom harrison (talk | contribs) →Blocked for violating revert parole: not convincing |
Irishpunktom (talk | contribs) →Blocked for violating revert parole: - so you admit this much? |
||
Line 128:
:: Second is a revert, to which I have previously ackowledged, however, the first is not. Its removal of irrelevent information about a building. It was subsequently removed by someone else after it was '''revert'''ed back in. Thats one revert, not two. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 15:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
:::It is not a revert, but "removal of irrelevent information about a building?" I do not find that convincing. Maybe someone else will. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 15:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
:::: So, you are openly saying that there is only one revert? --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 15:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
| |||