Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Fish: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dirtlawyer1 (talk | contribs) →Pamela Fish: delete +1 |
|||
Line 8:
* '''Delete''' Seems just to focus on a handful of negative aspects. Her career cannot just consist of a couple of cases that went wrong. (In one of which the outcome was only changed after developments in DNA testing). But even if the rest of her work is exemplary, still may well not pass notability. Unless it can be expanded with more context & demonstrate greater notability, should not be retained as it stands. [[User:Eagleash|Eagleash]] ([[User talk:Eagleash|talk]]) 13:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per Mr. X's comments and rationale above. [[User:Dirtlawyer1|Dirtlawyer1]] ([[User talk:Dirtlawyer1|talk]]) 14:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Person is only the subject of some very scant and mostly local sources for screwing up test results in criminal cases, has done nothing else to garner attention and remains a low-profile individual. Straight-up [[WP:BLP1E]]. [[User:Tarc|Tarc]] ([[User talk:Tarc|talk]]) 14:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
| |||