Content deleted Content added
Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) Rescuing 2 sources, flagging 0 as dead, and archiving 0 sources. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
Better Alternative→Reception of Section 106 Agreements |
||
Line 9:
* some obligations being unlawful
* obligations not actually within Section 106 of the Act
* better alternative
Better Alternative: Experience shows that S106 negotiations delay the planning process and is costly to both the developer in legal/planning advice and costly to the planning authority in terms of professional officer time. An annual [[Land Value Tax]] is a much more effective alternative which does not incur these costs and delays. <ref>www.TheIU.org</ref>
Obligations may be created that are more than the developer would consider a bare minimum, with local authorities seeking contributions from developers that go beyond the definition originally given in [[Department for Communities and Local Government]] (DCLG) Circular 1/97.<ref>[http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/publications/planningandbuilding/contributingsustainable ] {{wayback|url=http://www.communities.gov.uk/archived/publications/planningandbuilding/contributingsustainable |date=20081121100020 }}</ref> and later in Circular 5/05.
| |||