Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 37:
Consequently, I think that the map should be radically changed or deleted.[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 11:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
==The view of Zlatarski and Koledarov==
#Zlatarski suggests that the king of Hungary exempted Seneslav's lands from the king's donation to the Knights, because these lands didn't belonged to him - "''The first question which cause data from the papal charter, is: why Bela IV excluded from the offerings two mentioned voivodeships? He motivates himself with the provision that the Vlahs previously held these voivodeships, i.e. until 1247 - a very untenable ground, that he wanted to conceal the recognition that these lands at this time was not under his authority, but at the same time, he thought that these lands ware still belongs to him because they were inhabited thy emigrants from his country - Transylvanian mountains..."'' ([http://www.promacedonia.org/vz3/vz3_2_4.htm], p. 373)
#Based on the information of Rashid al Din about the Tatar attack in 1241, ''"Princes (Tatarians) moved mountains to enter the country of the Bulars (Bulgarians, according him) and Bashgirds (Magyars, according him)..."'' Zlatarski argues that once passed the Carpathians Tartars invaded the countries controlled by Bulgaria. As other authors, he identified Misheslav who met the Tatars to the south of the Carpathians with Seneslav.
#According Zlatarski "Hungarian king Bela IV bestowed in 1247 housed in Transylvanian border .... knights, 1, to defend it "contre païens, Bulgares et autres schismatiques", and this proves once again that the Bulgarian lands were located adjacent to Transylvania, and 2. to stop miss a single person from the kingdom of any nationality or any situation, without specific permission of the King, from the which it is clear that the placement of knights Transylvanian border was intended to stop the exodus of the Wallachian population of Transylvania because Wallachian emigration outside the Magyar country to that direction was already taken such proportions that the king decided that it is necessary to take precautions".
#Koledarov in general endroses Zlatarski and gives a detail that I currently can not check. He wrote that the (Romanian author) D. Onchul assumed that voivodeships of Seneslav and Litovoy were linked politically with Bulgaria and subsequently came under the dependence of Hungary. His source is: Bogdan, I. Romîni şi Bulgari. Raport cult şi politintre aceste dona popoare conferenţia. Bucureşti, 1981, p. 37. (Коледаров, Петър. Политическа география на средновековната българска държава, Втора част (1186-1396), София 1989 (Koledarov. Petar. Political Geography of the Medieval Bulgarian State, part II. From 1186 to 1396, Sofia 1989), p. 25)--[[User:JSimin|JSimin]] ([[User talk:JSimin|talk]]) 18:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
| |||