Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) |
SeanNovack (talk | contribs) →Media Matters and News Hounds: thoughts |
||
Line 1,066:
:: If there is a real reason to remove a Media Matters report, I don't know. But more generally, it does not seem credible or relevant to claim ''"Media Matters picks at "minor, isolated incidents"'''. On the contrary, that claim seems pulled from the butt and I doubt it would withstand any reasonable scrutiny. Media matters seems to often or usually support its claims with evidence. --[[User:Ihaveabutt|Ihaveabutt]] ([[User talk:Ihaveabutt|talk]]) 05:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
:::Given the fact that we are supposed to be putting forth an effort to make the articles in Wikipedia as neutral as possible as per [[WP:NPOV]], and Media Matters on its own website calls itself a "''progressive'' research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting ''conservative'' misinformation in the U.S. media", I can't see any way that MMfA could possibly qualify as "Reliable", as per [[WP:RS]]. The organization itself is claiming a bias and an agenda that violates NPOV, how can it be reliable? [[User:SeanNovack|Rapier]] ([[User talk:SeanNovack|talk]]) 19:00, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
== Video game sites ==
| |||