Rossall hockey: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Delink dates (WP:MOSUNLINKDATES) using Project:AWB
As an Old Rossallian having played this game for 5 years - I point out that brute force is if anything more important than skill.
Line 17:
Initially the rules of RossHockey were slightly different from those of today, with scoring occurring by a system of goals and [[Eton field game#rougeables|rougeables]].<ref name="William Furness 1944 p.297"/> It is also known that there were no restrictions on the number of players in a game and there was no fixed time of play - indeed one game lasted for two days.<ref name="William Furness 1944 p.297"/>
 
The official rules were drawn up in 1873 and two years later the first House RossHockey competition took place.<ref name="William Furness 1944 p.297"/> The rules were amended again in 1900 to abolish rougeables. Emphasis has always been placed on the game being one of skill and dribbling - notas simplywell as one of brute force.<ref name="findarticles.com">[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19970323/ai_n14095439 A game with stickability | Independent, The (London) | Find Articles at BNET.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
 
In 1997 the game was nearly abandoned after over 130 years of history when the supplier of the sticks went bankrupt. Fortunately a replacement supplier was found in [[Eccles]]{{dn}} where they had made [[lacrosse]] sticks for many years. <ref name="findarticles.com"/> The new sticks are slightly less ornate than the traditional ones and also made of [[hickory]] rather than [[Ash tree|ash]] but the gameplay has not been affected.<ref name="findarticles.com"/>