Wikipedia:Picture peer review/PanoramaOfDouglasBay: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Douglas Bay Panorama: indent |
|||
Line 13:
Thanks.--[[Special:Contributions/194.72.110.12|194.72.110.12]] ([[User talk:194.72.110.12|talk]]) 15:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
:*There's better at it than me, but if the originals have been done well I can usually get good results. And I have tried doing it when the originals have that inconsistent lighting by adjusting them first, but honestly haven't had a lot of success in doing so. I would have a try if the originals weren't too big (unfortunately I'm on a limited internet connection so can't handle, what, say 12, really big files - 1/2 a megabyte each I might be able to deal with), but I honestly don't know that the results will come out much better. Can I be so impertinent as to ask what equipment and settings you used to take the photos, and the conditions on the day (e.g., sun going in and out behind the clouds)? --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 10:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
*I have put up the originals now. They are all 1280x960 resolution so should be small enough to download while being large enough to preserve detail. I would be grateful with anything that you can come up with. I used a Panasonic Lumix FZ20 and the EXIF info on the source photos has been retained so you can see the settings that I have used for each photo on the image description page under the "Metadata" section. The day was quite cloudy yet bright. I hope this helps. If you need any more info, feel free to ask away. Thanks.--[[User:Ganeshrg|Ganeshrg]] ([[User talk:Ganeshrg|talk]]) 11:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
;Seconder:
*
| |||