Content deleted Content added
Removing false titles and excessive introductory commas, as well as a highly emotive quotation that seemingly serves no purpose but to be so; its unusual introduction, “In the words of…”, is something I’ve not seen in any other article. Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
Marcelbruin (talk | contribs) More general, that was only a small aspect of the Holocaust Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1:
{{short description|Inappropriate comparisons or analogies that trivialize the Holocaust}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2022}}
'''Holocaust trivialization''' refers to any comparison or analogy that diminishes the scale and severity of the
[[Manfred Gerstenfeld]] identifies trivialization of the Holocaust as one of eleven forms of Holocaust distortion; he defines Holocaust trivialization as the application of language that is specific to describing the Holocaust to events and purposes that are unrelated to it.<ref>{{cite web|last=Gerstenfeld|first=Manfred|date=28 October 2007|url=https://jcpa.org/article/the-multiple-distortions-of-holocaust-memory/|title=The Multiple Distortions of Holocaust Memory|publisher=Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs|access-date=2 December 2020}}</ref> According to David Rudrum examples of Holocaust trivialization include [[Lord Wigley]] invoking [[Auschwitz]] to oppose nuclear weapons and [[Al Gore]] citing ''[[Kristallnacht]]'' in defence of the environment.<ref name="Rudrum 2021">{{cite web|last=Rudrum|first=David|date=16 March 2021|url=https://holocaustlearning.org.uk/latest/holocaust-trivialisation/|title=Why Holocaust Trivialisation Isn't Trivial|publisher=The Holocaust Exhibition and Learning Centre|access-date=10 January 2022}}</ref>
|