Revision as of 19:57, 19 April 2024 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,216,570 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:British Post Office scandal/Archive 4) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:43, 5 May 2024 edit undo JzG (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 154,993 edits →‎Angela van den Bogerd: new section Tag: New topic Next edit →
Line 115: :This section of the article should not just be randomly selected list of successful appeals. It should address that ways in which the system was used, abused. Individual cases documented should illustrate and identify the particular aspects that show. The Wolstenholme case has some but not identified in its documentation here. [[User:Jacksoncowes\|Jacksoncowes]] ([[User talk:Jacksoncowes\|talk]]) 06:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC) ::The fact that Casleton & Wolstenholme are civil put them under a different heading in the way the article is currently structured but the point I have tried to elucidate remains. [[User:Jacksoncowes\|Jacksoncowes]] ([[User talk:Jacksoncowes\|talk]]) 06:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) == Angela van den Bogerd == I'm thinking of spinning out a separate article on Angela van den Bogerd, based on the volume of RS coverage of her, specifically. Any objhections? '''[[user:JzG\|Guy]]''' <small>([[user talk:JzG\|help!]] - [[User:JzG/Typos\|typo?]])</small> 23:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Talk:British Post Office scandal: Difference between revisions