Cultural relativism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
clarify wording
Line 5:
'''Cultural relativism''' is the position that there is no universal standard to measure cultures by, and that all cultural values and beliefs must be understood relative to their cultural context, and not judged based on outside norms and values. Proponents of cultural relativism also tend to argue that the norms and values of one culture should not be evaluated using the norms and values of another.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Cultural relativism|url=http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/problem/140048|date=12 December 2017|website=The Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential|access-date=27 May 2020}}</ref>
 
ItThe concept was established as inby [[anthropology|anthropologicalanthropologist]] research by [[Franz Boas]], in the first few decades of the 20th century and later popularized by his students. Boaswho first articulated the idea in 1887: "civilization is not something absolute, but{{nbsp}}...{{nbsp}}is relative, and{{nbsp}}... our ideas and conceptions are true only so far as our civilization goes".<ref>[[Franz Boas|Boas, Franz]]. 1887. "Museums of Ethnology and their classification." ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' 9:589.</ref> However, Boas did not coinuse the termphrase "cultural relativism". The concept was spread by Boas' students, such as [[Robert Lowie]].
 
The first use of the term recorded in the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' was by philosopher and social theorist [[Alain Locke]] in 1924 to describe [[Robert Lowie]]'s "extreme cultural relativism", found in the latter's 1917 book ''Culture and Ethnology''.<ref>Lowerie, Robert. 1917. ''[[iarchive:cultureethnology00lowiiala|Culture and Ethnology]]''. New York: Douglas C. McMurtrie.</ref>

The term became common among anthropologists after Boas' death in 1942, to express their synthesis of a number of ideas he had developed. Boas believed that the sweep of cultures, to be found in connection with any subspecies, is so vast and pervasive that there cannot be a relationship between culture and [[Race (classification of humans)|race]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.utpa.edu/faculty/mglazer/Theory/cultural_relativism.htm |title=Cultural Relativism |last=Glazer |first=Mark |location=Texas |publisher=University of Texas-Pan American |date=December 16, 1994 |access-date=June 13, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613222929/http://www.utpa.edu/faculty/mglazer/Theory/cultural_relativism.htm |archive-date=June 13, 2007 }}</ref> Cultural relativism involves specific [[epistemology|epistemological]] and [[Methodology|methodological]] claims. Whether or not these claims necessitate a specific [[ethics|ethical]] stance is a matter of debate. Cultural relativism became popularized after World War II in reaction to historical events such as "Nazism, and to colonialism, ethnocentrism and racism more generally."<ref>{{cite book|author=Giuliana B. Prato|title=Beyond Multiculturalism: Views from Anthropology|publisher=[[Routledge]]|year=2016|page=5|isbn= 9781317174677|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UJIGDAAAQBAJ&dq=%22cultural+relativism%22+colonial+multicultural&pg=PA5}}</ref>
 
==In antiquity==