Social status: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine
Line 1:
{{short description|Position within social structure}}
{{Sociology}}
'''Social status''' is the relative level of social value a person is considered to possess.<ref name=":2">{{cite journal|last1=Sauder|first1=Michael|last2=Lynn|first2=Freda|last3=Podolny|first3=Joel|title=Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology|journal=Annual Review of Sociology|date=2012|volume=38|pages=267–283|doi=10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145503|s2cid=73700406|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/179d1112570d10ba3be476b0e00bb9e19d67aaa9}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite journal|last1=Anderson|first1=Cameron|last2=Hildreth|first2=John|last3=Howland|first3=Laura|title=Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature|journal=Psychological Bulletin|date=2015|volume=141|issue=3|pages=574–601|doi=10.1037/a0038781|pmid=25774679|s2cid=17129083|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/48cd8f785a2ea53b3e537dbc7268cbfbe62b6042}}</ref> Such social value includes respect, [[honour|honor]], assumed competence, and deference.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Sedikides | first1 = C. | last2 = Guinote | first2 = A. | year = 2018 | title = How Status Shapes Social Cognition: Introduction to the Special Issue, 'The Status of Status: Vistas from Social Cognition' | journal = Social Cognition | volume = 36 | issue = 1| pages = 1–3 | doi=10.1521/soco.2018.36.1.1| doi-access = free }}</ref> On one hand, social scientists view status as a "reward" for group members who treat others well and take initiative.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ridgeway |first=Cecilia |title=Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter?: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter? |publisher=Russell Sage Foundation |year=2019}}</ref> This is one explanation for its apparent cross-cultural universality.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> On the other hand, while people with higher status experience a litany of benefits--such as greater health, admiration, resources, influence, and freedom--those with lower status experience poorer outcomes across all of those metrics.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
 
Importantly, status is based in widely shared ''[[beliefs]]'' about who members of a society judge as more competent or moral. While such beliefs can stem from an impressive performance or success, they can also arise from possessing characteristics a society has deemed meaningful like a person's race or occupation. In this way, status reflects how a society judges a person's relative social worth and merit--however accurate or inaccurate that judgement may be.<ref name=":6" /> Because societies use status to allocate resources, leadership positions, and other forms of power, status can make unequal distributions of resources and [[Power (social and political)|power]] appear natural and fair, supporting systems of [[social stratification]].<ref name=":6">{{cite journal|last1=Ridgeway |first1=Cecilia L. |author-link=Cecilia L. Ridgeway |last2=Correll |first2=Shelley |author2-link=Shelley Correll |title=Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs |journal=Social Forces |date=2006 |volume=85 |pages=431–453 |doi=10.1353/sof.2006.0139 |s2cid=145216264 }}</ref>