Content deleted Content added
→‎AN topic: Reply We used to do it that way in 2007. And what Tamzin said.
→‎RD3 request: new section
Line 1,927:
 
First ArbCom case request in which I read the opening statement all the way through without wanting a red pen. No opinion on the case itself, but that was clearly and consicely clear and concise. [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 19:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 
== RD3 request ==
 
This might need a RevDel: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Rules_for_Fools&diff=prev&oldid=1173468767] ''<b style="font-family:monospace,mono">[[User:InvalidOS|<span style="color:#06A;">Invalid</span>]][[User:InvalidOS/c|<sup style="color:#A60;margin-left:.25ex">OS</sup>]][[User:InvalidOS/t|<sub style="color:#06A;margin-left:-2.25ex">talk</sub>]]</b>'' 17:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)