Content deleted Content added
unless the decision altered or interpreted the document in a unique & newsworthy way, I don't see the relevance of isolating this one reference out of many other approving references |
SCOTUS is not just "one reference out of many approving references." It's the pinnacle of achievement. A real feather in the cap for the ALA. On this LBOR page, recognition of this is appropriate. |
||
Line 21:
The Library Bill of Rights was adopted by the association in its earliest form in [[1939]], and has been revised several times since. Its original adoption was introduced with the statement, "Today indications in many parts of the world point to growing intolerance, suppression of free speech, and [[censorship]] affecting the rights of minorities and individuals," a reference to the emergence of totalitarian states during that time.{{ref|39proc}} During the [[Cold War]] period, the Library Bill of Rights supported opponents of censorship of materials interpreted as communist propaganda. In [[1948]], the association adopted a major revision of the document, which strengthened it significantly to address the new wave of censorship attempts that marked the beginning of the [[Second Red Scare]], and was subsequently attacked in newspapers as "leftist," a "[[red front]]," and a "Communist organization."{{ref|hist}} A [[1967]] revision shortened the document and removed rhetorical flourishes, also removing the qualification "of sound factual authority," which it was felt could have been used to justify censorship; also, "age" (along with background, origin, and views) was added to the attributes that should not be a basis for denying access to information. {{ref|age}} The document was revised again in [[1980]].
In [[1996]], the American Library Association reaffirmed the inclusion of age as an attribute that should not be the basis for denying access to information. This occurred after the American Library Trustee Association (ALTA) brought a request for this to the ALA Council.{{ref|lbr}} In 2003, the [[United States Supreme Court]] referenced the Library Bill of Rights in [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=539&invol=194 ''US v. ALA''], 539 U.S. 194, 2003.
== References ==
| |||