Talk:Homeopathy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Eroz7 (talk | contribs)
Eroz7 (talk | contribs)
Line 190:
::My concern, summarized: the [[:Category:Consumer fraud|category]] is about [[fraud]], not [[quackery]]. Homeopathy is uncontroversially quackery, but we can't say the same for fraud. Obviously, I'm unsure about this, which is why I have put this into the discussion to get an opinion. Quite confusing how health fraud encompasses ignorant practices too, while the English definition of fraud very clearly involves intentional deceit. Want to get experienced editors' opinions on this matter and how categorization works in general (the guide is a bit ambiguous.) [[User:Eroz7|Eroz7]] ([[User talk:Eroz7|talk]]) 18:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
:There's a combination of true believers and frauds in the homeopathy business. &mdash; <b>[[User:HandThatFeeds|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:DarkBlue;cursor:help">The Hand That Feeds You</span>]]:<sup>[[User talk:HandThatFeeds|Bite]]</sup></b> 18:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
::Agreed, but the same can be said of any practice. [[User:Eroz7|Eroz7]] ([[User talk:Eroz7|talk]]) 18:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
: Also depends on the location. There are many true believers in homeopathy in Asia, for example. Meanwhile, in the West ... [https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2012/aug/02/1]. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 18:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)