Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aoidh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Huggums537 (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1143679788 by Huggums537 (talk) Revert ping fix. (Didn't work anyway...) |
Huggums537 (talk | contribs) →Oppose: Ping fix round two Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 303:
#::::::And I'm just trying to give an insight to how I think editors should not distastefully throw around holocaust quotes so as not to imply that Wikipedia editing is anywhere near as important. ––[[User:FormalDude|<span style="color:#004ac0">Formal</span><span style="color:black">Dude</span>]] [[User talk:FormalDude|<span style="color:#004ac0;font-size:90%;">(talk)</span>]] 05:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
#:::::::{{u|FormalDude}}, is my understanding that you believe the same quote should have different meanings in different situations that depend upon knowing if the quote came from a holocaust survivor or not? In other words, I'm trying to understand why it is you think this quote is so "distasteful". Is it because it came from a holocaust survivor? You called it a "holocaust quote", but I don't really understand what that is? I guess what I'm trying to say is that I kind of agree with {{u|Locke Cole}} that the quote is a very good one to live by that kinda makes sense here as it would in many other ordinary situations, and if someone had no idea the quote came from a holocaust survivor, then they would not have anything "distasteful" to compare it to so the fact we are even bringing that up at all is probably more distasteful than anything. Does that make sense? [[User:Huggums537|Huggums537]] ([[User talk:Huggums537|talk]]) 06:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
{{u|FormalDude}} {{u|Locke Cole}} [[User:Huggums537|Huggums537]] ([[User talk:Huggums537|talk]]) 06:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
=====Neutral=====
|