Content deleted Content added
Paramandyr (talk | contribs) c/e |
Paramandyr (talk | contribs) added information, added references |
||
Line 54:
==Battle==
The League army took position on the right side of the Taro river and the French decided to keep to the left bank. Charles organized his army in battle groups. The first
The French opened with an artillery bombardment, intending to kill as many of their opponents as possible.{{sfn|Nolan|2006|p=303-304}} Then they charged with their heavy cavalry, destroying and scattering the disordered Italian ranks in just minutes.{{sfn|Nolan|2006|p=304}} The fight was perhaps more memorable for the ineffectiveness of artillery on either side, other than the psychological effect achieved by the French guns.{{efn|The French guns stopped firing due to the rain making the powder wet.{{sfn|Santosuosso|1994|p=236}}}} Of the French and Italian casualties,{{efn|[[Paolo Giovio]] states 4,000 casualties for the League and 1,000 for the French, which Santosuosso believes is more accurate.{{sfn|Santosuosso|1994|p=246}}}} one eyewitness estimated that fewer than 10 men were killed by cannon fire.{{sfn|Nolan|2006|p=304}}
After the battle, Charles then marched on into Lombardy and returned to France.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=361}} ==Result==
Both parties strove to present themselves as the victors in the battle.{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}} The battle was reported in Venice as a victory, and was recorded and celebrated as such, which included the capture of Mathieu de Bourbon.{{sfn|Santosuosso|1994|p=248-249}} Regardless of the self-proclamations of victory by League commanders, Malipiero recognized that the League failed to stop the French from reaching Asti.{{sfn|Luzio|Renier|1890|p=219}} Despite Gonzaga's claim of victory and the ordering of the ''[[Madonna della Vittoria]]'' portrait,{{sfn|Kuiper|2009|p=114}} the Italian historian [[Francesco Guicciardini]]'s judgement was to award the palm of victory to the French.{{efn|If officially Italians celebrated the Battle of Fornovo as a victory – to the surprise of the French – privately,
many were not so sure. [[Francesco Guicciardini|Guicciardini’s]] verdict was that ‘general consent awarded the palm to the French’{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}}}}{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}}
Line 93 ⟶ 95:
*{{cite book |first1=Michael |last1=Mallett |first2=Christine |last2=Shaw |series=Modern Wars in Perspective |title=The Italian Wars 1494–1559 |publisher=Pearson |location=Harlow |year=2012 |isbn=978-0-582-05758-6}}
*{{cite book |first=Domenico |last=Malipiero |authorlink=Domenico Malipiero |title=Annali veneti dall'anno 1457 al 1500 |publisher=Firenze |year=1843 |language=Italian}}
*{{cite book |last=Nicolle |first=David |series=Praeger illustrated military history series |title=Fornovo 1495: France's Bloody Fighting Retreat |year=2005 |publisher=
*{{cite book |last=Nolan |first=Cathal |title=The Age Of Wars Of Religion, 1000–1650: An Encyclopedia of Global Warfare and Civilization A-K |volume=I |year=2006 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=Westport Connecticut |isbn=978-0-313-33733-8}}
*{{cite book |title=A History of The Art of War in the Sixteenth Century |first=Charles |last=Oman |publisher=Stackpole Books |year=1987 }}
*{{cite book |title=The Problem of Ireland in Tudor Foreign Policy, 1485–1603 |first=William |last=Palmer |publisher=The Boydell Press |location=Woodbridge |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-85115-562-3}}
*{{cite book |last=Ritchie |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Ritchie (historian) |year=2004 |title=Historical Atlas of The Renaissance |publisher=Thalamus Publishing |isbn=978-0-8160-5731-3 }}
|