Free-rider problem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Removed duplicated sentence.
Economic issues: Fix spacing
Line 19:
 
== Economic issues ==
Free riding is a problem of [[Pareto efficiency|economic inefficiency]] when it leads to the underproduction or overconsumption of a good. For example, when people are asked how much they value a particular [[Public good (economics)|public good]], with that value measured in terms of how much money they would be willing to pay, their tendency is to under-report their valuations.<ref name="Economics and the Environment">{{cite book |last1=Goodstein |first1=Eban |title=Economics and the Environment |date=2014 |publisher=Library of Congress |location=University of Minnesota |isbn=978-1-118-53972-9 |edition=7}}</ref> Goods that are subject to free riding are usually characterized by : the inability to exclude non-payers, its consumption by an individual does not impact the availability for others and that the resource in question must be produced and/or maintained. Indeed, if non-payers can be excluded by some mechanism, the good may be transformed into a [[club good]] (e.g. if an overused, congested public road is converted to a toll road, or if a free public museum turns into a private, admission fee-charging museum). This problem is sometimes compounded by the fact that common-property goods are characterized by [[Rivalry (economics)|rival]] consumption. Not only can consumers of common-property goods benefit without payment, but consumption by one imposes an opportunity cost on others. The theory of '[[Tragedy of the commons]]' highlights this, in which each consumer acts to maximize their own utility, and thereby relies on others to cut back their own consumption. This will lead to overconsumption and even possibly exhaustion or destruction of the common-property good. If too many people start to free ride, a system or service will eventually not have enough resources to operate. Free-riding is experienced when the production of goods does not consider the [[Externality|external costs]], particularly the use of [[ecosystem services]].
 
An example of this is global climate change initiatives. As climate change is a global issue, the benefits of reduced emissions in one country will extend beyond their own countries' borders and impact countries from around the world. However, this has resulted in some countries acting in their own self-interest, limiting their own efforts and free-riding on the work of others. In some countries, citizens and governments do not wish to contribute to the associated effort and costs of mitigation, as they are able to free-ride on the efforts of others.{{Fact|date=August 2021}} This free rider problem also raises questions in regards to the fairness and ethicalness of these practices, as countries most likely to suffer the [[effects of climate change|consequences of climate change]], are also those who typically emit the least greenhouse gases and have fewer economic resources to contribute to the efforts, such as the small island country of [[Tuvalu]].<ref>Climate Leadership Council (2020), 'Why Climate Progress is Deadlocked'</ref>{{full citation needed|date=August 2021}}