Content deleted Content added
Line 2:
==Origin of the title==
The title emerged in the early [[caliphate]]s, and can be traced to at least {{circa|715}}.{{sfn|Marsham|2009|p=114}} The title itself is ambiguous, as the term {{transl|ar|[[wali|walī]]}} can mean both 'possessor of' or 'successor to', and the exact scope of {{transl|ar|ʿahd}}, 'covenant, testament', is left unclear: it can be interpreted as the covenant of God with humanity as a whole, of the previous caliph, or of the Muslim community.{{sfn|Marsham|2009|pp=114–115}} The [[Umayyad]] caliphs certainly favoured a more absolutist interpretation, by which they claimed a mandate deriving directly from God, via their position as heirs to [[Muhammad]]. By the 740s, the term '''{{transl|ar|walī ʿahd al-muslimīn}}''' ({{lang|ar|ولي عهد المسلمين
The title was used by several medieval Islamic states, such as the [[Fatimid Caliphate]], the [[Seljuk Empire]], the [[Buyid dynasty]], [[Mamluk Egypt]], and in [[al-Andalus]].{{sfn|Ayalon|2002|p=126}} Uniquely, in 1013 the Fatimid caliph [[al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah|al-Hakim]], who also combined in his person the position of [[List of Isma'ili imams|imam]] of the [[Isma'ili]] branch of Islam, separated his succession in two: his cousin [[Abd al-Rahman ibn Ilyas]] was designated {{transl|ar|walī ʿahd al-muslimīn}} and heir to the caliphate, while another cousin, [[Abu Hashim al-Abbas ibn Shu'ayb]], was designated heir to the Isma'ili imamate, with the title of '''{{transl|ar|walī ʿahd al-muʾminīn}}''', 'successor to the covenant of the faithful', thereby separating the government of the Fatimid state from the hitherto state religion of Isma'ilism.{{sfn|Halm|2003|pp=279–281}} Following al-Hakim's murder in 1021, both heirs were sidelined and the succession to both offices united in the person of al-Hakim's son, [[al-Zahir li-i'zaz Din Allah|al-Zahir]].{{sfn|Halm|2003|pp=307–309}}
|